O. Selekhmeteva
To Win
K. Okamura
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L L L L L LForm
W W L W L W W L W WThey have played 2 sets in total, with Okamura winning 2 and Koshiishi winning 0. The last match between Okamura and Koshiishi was at the W50 Kofu, 18-03-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Kyoka Okamura getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Kyoka Okamura | 1 |
Ayumi Koshiishi | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W50 Kofu(18-03-2025)
Okamura | Stats | Koshiishi |
---|---|---|
28% (5-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 59% (20-14) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
182 | Ranking | 395 |
178 | Highest Rank | 395 |
29 | Age | 24 |
- | Plays | - |
3 | Titles | 8 |
54% (358-308) | Career Total W/L | 63% (281-164) |
$75,106 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
19 May 2025 / Q1 round
- / First
French Open - Paris atp
19 May 2025 / Q1 round
French Open - Paris wta
19 May 2025 / Q1 round
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Kyoka Okamura
Player
Ayumi Koshiishi
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 6 |
5 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:21:25 | Average Match Time | 1:21:25 |
70% (39/56) | 1st Serve % | 58% (37/64) |
69% (27/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (21/37) |
41% (7/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (9/27) |
45% (5/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 22% (2/9) |
53% (34/64) | Return Points Win % | 39% (22/56) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
When comparing two players, how crucial is the foreboding second serve? Koshiishi has successfully claimed 39.26% of points from their second serve in the past six months. Meanwhile, their rival, Okamura, boasts a slightly higher figure with a 39.72% success rate. This particular statistic serves as a key indicator when forecasting match outcomes. But does this give Okamura a noticeable edge in the prediction stakes?
Looking at return game statistics, Koshiishi has the upper hand, having won 51.68% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Okamura's 48.92%. When considering the ability to return first serves, Koshiishi again leads with 35.17%, while Okamura follows at 32.81%. These figures are highly telling of potential match favorability between the two. With these stats, could Koshiishi be in a better position to counterattack?
In pressure situations, the efficiency in saving breakpoints can shift the momentum dramatically. Koshiishi has managed to fend off 45.32% of breakpoints, whereas Okamura has a slight advantage, saving 46.98%. This ability to handle pressure points adds another dimension to live match betting predictions. So, does Okamura's slight edge forecast resilience under pressure?
Throughout the last year, Koshiishi has emerged victorious in 61.73% of matches (50 wins and 31 losses), while Okamura has achieved a 59.26% win rate (48 wins and 33 losses). These results provide a comprehensive view of both players' recent form and win potential. On their best surfaces, Koshiishi has excelled on hard courts with a 65% win rate, whereas Okamura shines on grass with a 64% success rate. Will the choice of surface tip the balance in favor of one?
On the competitive circuit, the level of tournaments played is a factor in evaluating player experience. Koshiishi and Okamura have similarly engaged in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, where Okamura slightly edges out at a 60.56% win rate compared to Koshiishi's 58.82%. Does this indicate Okamura's potential dominance in higher-level matchups?
The quality of opponents faced also reflects their journey over the past year. Koshiishi has taken on opponents with an average rank of 405.88, while Okamura's adversaries averaged around 371.05. In scenarios where matches reach a deciding set, Okamura has a slight advantage, winning 67% while Koshiishi captures 64%. Do these figures foretell a tighter contest under the pressure of a pensive final set?
Delving into breakpoint conversions, Koshiishi shines with a 47.24% conversion rate, ahead of Okamura's 38.83%. In live matches, such accuracy in seizing opportunities could prove pivotal. As we piece these stats together in a comparison puzzle, each number draws us toward predicting a finely balanced match. However, considering all relevant statistics, Koshiishi appears to edge out Okamura overall. Whether this predicted outcome holds true, the court will soon reveal.
Okamura vs Koshiishi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Renata Jamrichova
Player
Kyoka Okamura
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
75%
(
54 of
72)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
0
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Miriam Bianca Bulgaru
Player
Kyoka Okamura
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
35 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
99
Total Points Won
83
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Kyoka Okamura
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
24 of
32)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lanlana Tararudee
Player
Kyoka Okamura
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Hanyu Guo
Player
Kyoka Okamura
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ajla Tomljanovic
Player
Kyoka Okamura
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Katherine Sebov
Player
Kyoka Okamura
84%
(
58 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Kyoka Okamura
Player
Anna Dvorackova
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
43%
(
27 of
63)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ayumi Koshiishi
Player
Hiroko Kuwata
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
46%
(
17 of
37)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
53%
(
30 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Wushuang Zheng
Player
Ayumi Koshiishi
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ayumi Koshiishi
Player
Ena Koike
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ayumi Koshiishi
Player
Hikaru Sato
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
24)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Zongyu Li
Player
Ayumi Koshiishi
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ayumi Koshiishi
Player
Yeri Hong
58%
(
56 of
97)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
90%
(
9 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
48%
(
47 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Rina Saigo
Player
Ayumi Koshiishi
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
54
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
54% (358/308) | Win/Loss | 63% (281/164) |
53% (822/725) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (608/380) |
51% (7230/6901) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (4852/3913) |
54% (269/231) | Hard Win/Loss | 65% (211/114) |
44% (23/29) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (26/15) |
56% (50/39) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (44/35) |
64% (16/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
668 | Aces Total | 761 |
0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
1565 | Total Double Faults | 1264 |
1:19:29 | Average Match Time | 1:14:19 |
538.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 500.07 |
63% (20430/32579) | 1st Serve % | 60% (12540/20976) |
61% (12373/20430) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (7735/12540) |
46% (5537/12147) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3819/8435) |
47% (1900/4011) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1438/2884) |
45% (14872/33060) | Return Points Win % | 48% (10076/20920) |
0% (0/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
40% (12/18) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
53% (288/251) | Challenger W/L | 54% (130/112) |
62% (58/36) | Futures W/L | 74% (151/52) |
54% (354/661) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (274/435) |
50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
46% (57/123) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (42/74) |
50% (108/216) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (53/104) |
84% (359/302) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (279/252) |
16% (359/57) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (279/26) |
18% (307/55) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (166/29) |