Kyle Seelig vs Li Tu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Seelig vs Tu analysis and find out who is favored!
Kyle Seelig vs Li Tu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Seelig has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Tu has won 52.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Seelig, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tu has won 50.69%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.53% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Seelig has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tu has saved 64.58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Seelig has won 50% of matches played (W/L 4/ 4), with Tu winning 56.94% (W/L 41/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Seelig has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 40/ 21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 13/ 13). Tu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 108/ 53), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 24/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Seelig has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 2/ 1), where as Tu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.11% of matches (W/L 23/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Seelig winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Seelig winning 2 and Tu winning 2. The last match between Seelig and Tu was at the M15 Monastir, 04-09-2021, Semifinals, Hard with Kyle Seelig getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:24:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Seelig and Tu have played a deciding set 0 times, with Seelig winning 0 times and Tu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Seelig winning 0, and Tu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Seelig has played against opponents with an average rank of 161.75 while Tu has played against players with an average rank of 229.1.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Seelig has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tu has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Seelig has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tu has converted 36.06% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Seelig 1 - 1 Tu
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
886
Rank
349
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
193
Rank
186
High
27
Age
Plays
10
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
Form
64% (143-81)
Career Total W/L
64% (159-90)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
68% (13-6)
$4,125
Career Prize Money
$98,510
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Kyle Seelig | Li Tu |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
Games Won | 18 | 19 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 19 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1:24:30 | 1:24:30 |
1st Serve % | 71% (76/107) | 59% (68/115) |
1st Serve Win% | 64% (49/76) | 68% (46/68) |
2nd Serve Win% | 48% (15/31) | 49% (23/47) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (5/15) | 60% (6/10) |
Return Points W% | 40% (46/115) | 40% (43/107) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-2 |
Kyle Seelig
Player
Li Tu
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
6-2 6-3 |
Li Tu
Player
Kyle Seelig
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
12
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Kyle Seelig | Li Tu |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 68% (13/6) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 66% (27/14) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (229/180) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 68% (13/6) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.37 |
Aces Total | 0 | 74 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.1 |
DFs Total | 0 | 21 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:29:44 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 252.11 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 65% (757/1157) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 73% (553/757) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (224/400) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 37% (44/120) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (474/1217) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 90% (9/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (13/19) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 36% (4/11) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 93% (14/13) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 7% (14/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (5/0) |
Kyle Seelig Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Evan Burnett
Player
Kyle Seelig
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Kyle Seelig
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kyle Seelig
Player
John-Patrick Smith
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Kyle Seelig
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kyle Seelig
Player
Benjamin Kittay
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Darian King
Player
Kyle Seelig
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kyle Seelig
Player
A.j. Catanzariti
70%
(
80 of
114)
1st Serve %
75%
(
92 of
123)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
57 of
92)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
44 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
52 of
123)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(3) 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kyle Seelig
Player
Leo Vithoontien
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
46
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Kyle Seelig
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
83 of
113)
9
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
53 of
83)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
24 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Adam Walton
Player
Kyle Seelig
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Li Tu Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
James McCabe
Player
Li Tu
59%
(
63 of
106)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Paul Jubb
Player
Li Tu
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
F | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
SF |
Li Tu
Player
Luke Saville
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Li Tu
Player
Andre Ilagan
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
93%
(
13 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Li Tu
Player
Makoto Ochi
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
77%
(
27 of
35)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Li Tu
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve %
82%
(
51 of
62)
12
Aces
5
-
Double Faults
-
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
F | 7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | |||
SF |
Li Tu
Player
Alex Bolt
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Li Tu
Player
Christian Langmo
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more