Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kyle Seelig vs Dayne Kelly Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Seelig vs Kelly analysis and find out who is favored!
Kyle Seelig vs Dayne Kelly Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Seelig has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Kelly has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Seelig, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kelly has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Seelig has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kelly has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Seelig has won 50% of matches played (W/L 4/ 4), with Kelly winning 28.57% (W/L 2/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Seelig has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 40/ 21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 13/ 13). Kelly has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 33/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Seelig has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 2/ 1), where as Kelly has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 1/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Seelig winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Seelig winning 2 and Kelly winning 0. The last match between Seelig and Kelly was at the M25 Traralgon, 18-11-2022, Quarterfinals, Hard with Kyle Seelig getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:38:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Seelig and Kelly have played a deciding set 0 times, with Seelig winning 0 times and Kelly 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Seelig winning 0, and Kelly 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Seelig has played against opponents with an average rank of 161.75 while Kelly has played against players with an average rank of 54.86.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Seelig has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kelly has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Seelig has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kelly has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Seelig 1 - 0 Kelly
886
Rank
349
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
771
Rank
252
High
33
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
64% (143-81)
Career Total W/L
61% (451-291)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,125
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kyle Seelig | Dayne Kelly |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:0 | 1:38:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 77% (41/53) | 64% (44/69) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (32/41) | 68% (30/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (6/12) | 40% (10/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (29/69) | 28% (15/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Kyle Seelig
Player
Dayne Kelly
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kyle Seelig | Dayne Kelly |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Kyle Seelig Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Burnett
Player
Kyle Seelig
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Kyle Seelig
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Seelig
Player
John-Patrick Smith
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Kyle Seelig
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Seelig
Player
Benjamin Kittay
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Darian King
Player
Kyle Seelig
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Seelig
Player
A.j. Catanzariti
70%
(
80 of
114)
1st Serve %
75%
(
92 of
123)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
57 of
92)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
44 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
52 of
123)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(3) 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Seelig
Player
Leo Vithoontien
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
46
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Kyle Seelig
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
83 of
113)
9
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
53 of
83)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
24 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Kyle Seelig
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Dayne Kelly Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Henrik Wiersholm
Player
Dayne Kelly
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve %
68%
(
15 of
22)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
12 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
7 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
23
Total Points Won
23
|
4-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isaac Becroft
Player
Dayne Kelly
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
3
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
4-6 6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Loutit
Player
Dayne Kelly
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dayne Kelly
Player
Cihan Akay
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
58 of
85)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Dayne Kelly
58%
(
72 of
124)
1st Serve %
68%
(
76 of
111)
4
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
47 of
76)
44%
(
23 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
48 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
111)
117
Total Points Won
118
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dayne Kelly
Player
Seon Yong Han
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Dayne Kelly
49%
(
43 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
41 of
52)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
26 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(6) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jea Moon Lee
Player
Dayne Kelly
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Dayne Kelly
Player
Yuta Shimizu
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
9
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Seelig Vs Kelly Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
