Kyle Kang vs Moerani Bouzige Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W W W W L L
Form
W L W W L W L W L LH2H: Kang 1 - 0 Bouzige
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kang winning 2 and Bouzige winning 0. The last match between Kang and Bouzige was at the M15 Rancho Santa Fe, 20-06-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Hard, with Kyle Kang getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kyle Kang | 1 |
| Moerani Bouzige | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M15 Rancho Santa Fe(20-06-2025)
Kyle Kang
Moerani Bouzige
6
2
6
4
| Kang | Stats | Bouzige |
|---|---|---|
| 72% (13-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (28-22) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 588 | Ranking | 336 |
| 588 | Highest Rank | 336 |
| 20 | Age | 26 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 3 |
| 57% (74-56) | Career Total W/L | 55% (185-151) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Boisson VS Tomova PREDICTION Clay
European Open - Hamburg wta
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Udvardy VS Cristian PREDICTION Clay
UniCredit Iasi Open - Iasi wta
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Kyle Kang
Player
Moerani Bouzige
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:31:4 | Average Match Time | 1:31:4 |
| 64% (32/50) | 1st Serve % | 63% (41/65) |
| 72% (23/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (25/41) |
| 67% (12/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (11/24) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 45% (29/65) | Return Points Win % | 30% (15/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kang vs Bouzige Match Preview :
- Recent second serve performance indicates Kang has a slight edge, winning 43.4% of points compared to Bouzige's 43.13%.
- In return games, Bouzige outperforms Kang in winning points on opponents' second serves with 45% versus 38%; however, Kang excels on first serve returns, achieving 30.83% compared to Bouzige's 24.9%.
- Breakpoints saved is a critical metric under pressure; Bouzige significantly surpasses Kang, saving 52.71% compared to Kang's 29.17%.
- Kang boasts a higher win percentage overall in the past year at 66.67%, while Bouzige sits at 57.83%.
- Each player shows distinct strengths on different surfaces: Kang is more successful on Clay (62%), whereas Bouzige prefers Hard courts (57%).
- In Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, Kang's win rate stands at 69.23%, outpacing Bouzige's 61.82%.
- Opponent quality faced over the past year shows Bouzige has played against slightly tougher opponents, with an average rank of 365.45 compared to Kang's 381.5.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Bouzige has a small advantage, having won 61% of deciding sets versus Kang's 58%.
- Recent performance on breakpoints highlights a stark contrast, with Kang converting 63.64% of chances against Bouzige's 23.83%.
Editorial Prediction (June 20, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Kang and Bouzige presents intriguing dynamics with both players showcasing strengths in different areas.
Kang demonstrates a minor advantage in second serve performance and first serve return games. However, Kang's ability to convert breakpoints stands out as a decisive factor, potentially swinging the match in his favor at critical junctures.
Bouzige, on the other hand, illustrates resilience under pressure by saving a higher percentage of breakpoints. Additionally, his winning record in deciding sets could prove invaluable in tightly contested situations.
Assessing their recent success rates and break point conversion efficiency, Kang seems more poised to leverage key opportunities and turn the match to his advantage.
Thus, based on a comprehensive comparative analysis, Kang appears to have a slight edge and is more likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming encounter.
Kang vs Bouzige Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Kyle Kang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Samir Banerjee
Player
Kyle Kang
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
86)
1
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
44%
(
42 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gianluca Brunkow
Player
Kyle Kang
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
31%
(
10 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Evan Bynoe
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Aadarsh Tripathi
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
47%
(
45 of
95)
7
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
4
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
36 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
107
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Dane Sweeny
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Dominique Rolland
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
55
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Hudson Rivera
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
92)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Moerani Bouzige Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alan Magadan
Player
Moerani Bouzige
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
58 of
109)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
13
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
36%
(
39 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
109)
110
Total Points Won
106
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Moerani Bouzige
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
4
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Marek Gengel
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Moerani Bouzige
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
12
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Naoki Tajima
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Moerani Bouzige
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Leo Vithoontien
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
82)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Roshan Santhosh
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
18 of
33)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
14 of
18)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
46
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (74/56) | Win/Loss | 55% (185/151) |
| 55% (166/136) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (412/357) |
| 52% (1500/1408) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3763/3518) |
| 58% (53/38) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (172/133) |
| 62% (21/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 38% (6/10) |
| 0% (0/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (7/7) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
| 301 | Aces Total | 1288 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 240 | Total Double Faults | 764 |
| 1:41:43 | Average Match Time | 1:25:35 |
| 429.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 420.22 |
| 59% (4887/8304) | 1st Serve % | 60% (11147/18490) |
| 67% (3254/4887) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (7816/11147) |
| 51% (1749/3417) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3622/7342) |
| 42% (368/866) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (704/1701) |
| 41% (3425/8361) | Return Points Win % | 38% (7207/18728) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 31% (4/9) | Challenger W/L | 47% (24/27) |
| 60% (70/47) | Futures W/L | 57% (161/122) |
| 56% (71/126) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (183/331) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (19/38) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (56/100) |
| 55% (22/40) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (57/100) |
| 88% (66/58) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (169/148) |
| 12% (66/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (169/21) |
| 25% (64/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (167/37) |
Kang vs. Bouzige Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
