Kyle Edmund vs Patrick Zahraj Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Jul at 08:30 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Edmund vs P. Zahraj

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Edmund 1 - 0 Zahraj
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kyle Edmund winning 2 and Patrick Zahraj winning 0. The last match between Kyle Edmund and Patrick Zahraj was at the Nottingham 3 Challenger, 11-07-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Grass, with Kyle Edmund getting the victory 7-6(4) 4-3 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Edmund | 1 |
| Zahraj | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Nottingham 3 Challenger(07-11-25)
K. Edmund vs P. Zahraj H2H Profile
K. Edmund vs P. Zahraj Match Preview:
- Edmund has a stronger second serve recently, winning 45.76% of points compared to Zahraj's 41.93%. Could this give Edmund an upper hand?
- Return game stats show Zahraj slightly leads in winning points on opponent's second serve (48.07% vs. Edmund's 45.65%). Is Zahraj more effective on the return?
- First serve return reveals minimal advantage for Zahraj with 25.96% over Edmund's 24.86%, showing a potential edge in returning.
- Under pressure, Zahraj shines with 55.87% breakpoints saved compared to Edmund's 44.55%. Will Zahraj's clutch save skills decide the match?
- When examining overall match wins over the last year, Edmund has a slight edge at 57.78%, while Zahraj is close at 56.79%.
- Both players excel on indoor hard courts, with Edmund at 69% and Zahraj at 65% win percentages, suggesting a level playing field on this surface.
- Edmund and Zahraj have played most matches in similar lower-tier tournaments, but Edmund has a heightened win rate of 67.86% versus Zahraj's 60.71%.
- Examining opponent difficulty, Zahraj has faced slightly tougher competition, with the average opponent ranking at 375.14, higher than Edmund's 435.84.
- In deciding sets, Zahraj excels with a 60% win rate, whereas Edmund trails at 40%, indicating Zahraj’s potential resilience in crucial moments.
- The breakpoint conversion rate is close, with Zahraj slightly ahead at 34.25% against Edmund’s 33.33%, offering no clear advantage.
Editorial Prediction (July 10, 2025, UTC):
The examination of recent player statistics highlights an intriguing competitive balance between Kyle Edmund and Zahraj. Edmund’s notable performance on second serves and overall win percentage exhibits a robust groundwork.
On the other hand, Zahraj's superior capability to return serves and manage high-pressure breakpoints suggests a potential edge in tense situations. Moreover, Zahraj’s successful track record in deciding sets alongside battling tougher opponents elevates his standing in this comparison.
Considering these statistical insights, Zahraj appears to have a slight advantage in this fascinating match-up, potentially making him the more likely winner of the upcoming encounter.
Kyle Edmund vs Patrick Zahraj Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Edmund vs P. Zahraj H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 11 | Games Won | 9 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:49:30 | Average Match Time | 1:49:30 |
| 68% (36/53) | 1st Serve % | 53% (40/75) |
| 81% (29/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 83% (33/40) |
| 53% (9/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (12/35) |
| 22% (2/9) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 40% (30/75) | Return Points Win % | 28% (15/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
K. Edmund Recent Matches Played
P. Zahraj Recent Matches Played

K. Edmund vs P. Zahraj Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.60% (366/238) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.18% (150/117) |
| 59.20% (862/594) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.15% (332/270) |
| 53.20% (7449/6552) | Games Win/Loss | 52.14% (2991/2746) |
| 56.79% (138/105) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.78% (19/17) |
| 65.89% (141/73) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.44% (70/61) |
| 69.07% (67/30) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.54% (56/35) |
| 40.00% (20/30) | Grass Win/Loss | 55.56% (5/4) |
| 0.38 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 |
| 2576 | Aces Total | 967 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.36 |
| 1266 | Total Double Faults | 1009 |
| 1:23:5 | Average Match Time | 1:30:19 |
| 523.3 | Average Opponent Rank | 376.52 |
| 59% (21718/36546) | 1st Serve % | 61% (9352/15275) |
| 72% (15735/21718) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (6427/9352) |
| 52% (7762/14820) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2644/5923) |
| 41% (1379/3358) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (714/1677) |
| 38% (13833/36405) | Return Points Win % | 42% (6473/15557) |
| 55.17% (32/26) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41.27% (26/37) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58.33% (7/5) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54.29% (76/64) | Main Tour W/L | 30.00% (3/7) |
| 66.86% (117/58) | Challenger W/L | 52.70% (39/35) |
| 69.48% (107/47) | Futures W/L | 59.02% (108/75) |
| 62% (339/543) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (148/261) |
| 47% (26/55) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 51% (108/212) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (40/74) |
| 47% (84/177) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (39/72) |
| 84% (379/317) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (148/128) |
| 16% (379/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (148/19) |
| 22% (225/49) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (119/21) |