Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kyle Edmund vs Nicolas Jarry Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Edmund vs Jarry analysis and find out who is favored!
Kyle Edmund vs Nicolas Jarry Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Edmund has won 51.42% of points on his second serve, while Jarry has won 53.4%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Edmund, in recent form, has won 50.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jarry has won 48.49%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.39% and 26.42% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Edmund has saved 61.01% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jarry has saved 64.12% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Edmund has won 62.79% of matches played (W/L 27/ 16), with Jarry winning 60% (W/L 36/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Edmund has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 55/ 25), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 34% (W/L 13/ 25). Jarry has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 291/ 156), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 9/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Edmund has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 78.57% of matches (W/L 22/ 6), where as Jarry has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 64.29% of matches (W/L 18/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Edmund winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Edmund winning 4 and Jarry winning 0. The last match between Edmund and Jarry was at the BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, 10-03-2019, Second, Hard with Kyle Edmund getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:10:42.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Edmund and Jarry have played a deciding set 0 times, with Edmund winning 0 times and Jarry 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Edmund winning 1, and Jarry 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Edmund has played against opponents with an average rank of 308.09 while Jarry has played against players with an average rank of 117.82.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Edmund has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jarry has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Edmund has converted 39.73% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jarry has converted 32.9% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Edmund 2 - 0 Jarry
420
Rank
14
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
22
Rank
18
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
61% (332-212)
Career Total W/L
60% (387-255)
63% (15-9)
YTD W/L
52% (11-10)
$3,623,010
Career Prize Money
$2,644,280
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kyle Edmund | Nicolas Jarry |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 13 | 19 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:10:42 | 1:10:42 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (66/99) | 65% (81/124) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (52/66) | 64% (52/81) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 64% (21/33) | 37% (16/43) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (8/19) | 20% (1/5) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (56/124) | 26% (26/99) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
Kyle Edmund
Player
Nicolas Jarry
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 6-3 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Nicolas Jarry
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
7
Aces
17
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kyle Edmund | Nicolas Jarry |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (15/9) | 52% (11/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (34/24) | 49% (26/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (299/256) | 50% (282/277) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (7/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 44% (4/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (13/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0.63 |
| Aces Total | 121 | 174 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 66 | 40 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:11 | 2:19:13 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 368.13 | 146.52 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1052/1793) | 63% (1063/1688) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (775/1052) | 76% (805/1063) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (390/741) | 53% (329/625) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (65/167) | 34% (47/138) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (673/1795) | 36% (649/1825) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (7/5) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 38% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 91% (10/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (15/24) | 53% (10/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 20% (2/10) | 50% (7/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 60% (6/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (15/12) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (15/3) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 23% (13/3) |
Kyle Edmund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Kyle Edmund
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Kyle Edmund
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Johannes Ingildsen
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Kyle Edmund
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Gerald Melzer
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Kyle Edmund
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
28%
(
22 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Denis Yevseyev
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Andrea Picchione
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Kyle Edmund
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Nicolas Jarry Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Nicolas Jarry
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
66)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Nicolas Jarry
77%
(
62 of
81)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Nicolas Jarry
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
6
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Casper Ruud
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
8
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
14 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
72%
(
67 of
93)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
13
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
59 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
51 of
70)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
21 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Jack Draper
66%
(
76 of
115)
1st Serve %
60%
(
77 of
128)
18
Aces
20
6
Double Faults
7
79%
(
60 of
76)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
58 of
77)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
48 of
128)
123
Total Points Won
120
|
7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Nicolas Jarry
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
63 of
120)
4
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
9
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
120)
111
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Nicolas Jarry
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Federico Coria
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
10
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
11 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Nicolas Jarry
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Edmund Vs Jarry Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
