Kyle Edmund vs Maik Steiner Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L W W W W L
Form
L W L W L L L W W LHead-2-Head: Edmund 1 - 0 Steiner
They have played 2 sets in total, with Edmund winning 2 and Steiner winning 0. The last match between Edmund and Steiner was at the M25 Reggio Emilia, 14-05-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Kyle Edmund getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kyle Edmund | 1 |
| Maik Steiner | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Reggio Emilia(14-05-2025)
Kyle Edmund
Maik Steiner
6
3
6
1
| Edmund | Stats | Steiner |
|---|---|---|
| 56% (10-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 30% (6-14) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 407 | Ranking | 790 |
| 14 | Highest Rank | 656 |
| 30 | Age | 31 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 15 | Titles | 0 |
| 61% (366-238) | Career Total W/L | 58% (200-146) |
| $3,623,010 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fett VS Cristian PREDICTION Clay
UniCredit Iasi Open - Iasi wta
17 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Baez VS Kjaer PREDICTION Clay
Nordea Open - Bastad atp
16 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Kyle Edmund
Player
Maik Steiner
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:18:24 | Average Match Time | 1:18:24 |
| 69% (29/42) | 1st Serve % | 60% (34/57) |
| 83% (24/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (16/34) |
| 54% (7/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (11/23) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 53% (30/57) | Return Points Win % | 26% (11/42) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Edmund vs Steiner Match Preview :
- Who has been more effective recently on second serve points? Steiner, with a success rate of 47.68%, slightly surpasses Edmund's 46.36%.
- In return games, Edmund shows an edge in winning points on opponents' second serves at 50.41%, compared to Steiner's 46.44%.
- How do they compare on first serve returns? Both fare similarly, with Steiner at 30.12% and Edmund close behind at 29.9%.
- Under pressure, Steiner excels at saving breakpoints 56.45% of the time, outperforming Edmund's 35.29% rate.
- In terms of overall match wins in the past year, Edmund comes out ahead, winning 58.54% of his matches, while Steiner has won 52.08%.
- Analyzing surface preferences, Steiner thrives on clay with a 61% win rate, while Edmund's best surface is indoor hard courts, where he wins 69% of matches.
- Considering tournament experience, Edmund has played more challenging matches in the last year, with a win rate of 66.67% at higher-level events compared to Steiner's 54.55% at lower-level tournaments.
- Who faces tougher opponents? Over the past year, Edmund has regularly faced players with a higher average rank (232.9), giving him an experience advantage over Steiner, who faced opponents averaging a rank of 306.52.
- In deciding sets, both players have a 40% winning ratio, potentially indicating a tight final set if their match goes the distance.
- Currently, Steiner is slightly better at converting break points with a rate of 33.98%, as opposed to Edmund's 30.56% conversion rate.
Editorial Prediction (May 14, 2025, UTC):
In analyzing the stats for this matchup, it appears Edmund’s experience at higher-level tournaments and proficiency at facing stronger opponents give him a slight competitive edge.
In scenarios under match pressure, Steiner demonstrates resilience, especially in saving break points, showing that he can effectively handle crucial moments.
While both players exhibit strengths in specific areas, Edmund's greater success rate in return games and experience against stronger opponents suggest that he is more likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming match.
Edmund vs Steiner Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Kyle Edmund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Jack Pinnington Jones
Player
Kyle Edmund
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
57)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Hamish Stewart
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Patrick Zahraj
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
11
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
33 of
40)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Liam Broady
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Tom Hands
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
11
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Kyle Edmund
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Kyle Edmund
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
9
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Maik Steiner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
Player
Maik Steiner
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maik Steiner
Player
David Fix
54%
(
66 of
122)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
5
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
54%
(
30 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
44%
(
54 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
110
Total Points Won
111
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maik Steiner
Player
Alec Beckley
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Imanol Lopez Morillo
Player
Maik Steiner
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomasz Berkieta
Player
Maik Steiner
58%
(
56 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Maik Steiner
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maik Steiner
Player
Amir Omarkhanov
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolo Toffanin
Player
Maik Steiner
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
49%
(
41 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(2) 0-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (366/238) | Win/Loss | 58% (200/146) |
| 59% (862/594) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (456/329) |
| 53% (7449/6552) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4052/3428) |
| 57% (138/105) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (82/61) |
| 66% (141/73) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (114/77) |
| 69% (67/30) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (4/8) |
| 40% (20/30) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.38 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 2576 | Aces Total | 749 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1266 | Total Double Faults | 546 |
| 1:23:5 | Average Match Time | 1:6:49 |
| 508.55 | Average Opponent Rank | 326.24 |
| 59% (21718/36546) | 1st Serve % | 61% (9104/14911) |
| 72% (15735/21718) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (6150/9104) |
| 52% (7762/14820) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (2943/5807) |
| 41% (1379/3358) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (642/1477) |
| 38% (13833/36405) | Return Points Win % | 40% (5959/14921) |
| 55% (32/26) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (26/37) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (7/5) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (76/64) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (117/58) | Challenger W/L | 29% (2/5) |
| 69% (107/47) | Futures W/L | 58% (198/141) |
| 62% (339/543) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (199/345) |
| 47% (26/55) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (108/212) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (42/80) |
| 47% (84/177) | Deciding Set Win % | 39% (37/94) |
| 84% (379/317) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (207/184) |
| 16% (379/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (207/23) |
| 22% (225/49) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (139/16) |
Edmund vs. Steiner Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
