Kyle Edmund vs Liam Broady Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L W W W W L
Form
L W W W L L W L W LH2H: Edmund 2 - 1 Broady
They have played 6 sets in total, with Edmund winning 4 and Broady winning 2. The last match between Edmund and Broady was at the Nottingham 3 Challenger, 10-07-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Grass, with Kyle Edmund getting the victory 7-6(1) 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kyle Edmund | 2 |
| Liam Broady | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Nottingham 3 Challenger(10-07-2025)
Kyle Edmund
Liam Broady
7
6
6
2
| Edmund | Stats | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| 56% (10-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (28-15) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 407 | Ranking | 534 |
| 14 | Highest Rank | 93 |
| 30 | Age | 31 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 15 | Titles | 10 |
| 61% (366-238) | Career Total W/L | 58% (503-371) |
| $3,623,010 | Career Prize Money | $1,004,050 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Quinn VS O'Connell PREDICTION Hard
Citi Open - Washington atp
21 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Misolic VS Etcheverry PREDICTION Clay
Generali Open - Kitzbuhel atp
20 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 6-2 |
Stats 
Kyle Edmund
Player
Liam Broady
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 7-6(3) |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Liam Broady
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
| 6-3 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 31 | Games Won | 32 |
| 17 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:17:9 | Average Match Time | 1:17:9 |
| 64% (89/139) | 1st Serve % | 66% (107/161) |
| 76% (68/89) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (64/107) |
| 64% (32/50) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (30/54) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
| 42% (67/161) | Return Points Win % | 28% (39/139) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 100% (3/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/3) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Edmund vs Broady Match Preview :
- In the last six months, both players have similar second serve success rates: Broady at 44.27% and Edmund at 44.95%. Can this subtle difference influence the match? It seems minimal.
- When looking at their ability to return the opponent’s second serve, Edmund has a slight advantage, winning 46.62% of those points compared to Broady's 43.5%.
- Conversely, Broady edges ahead in returning first serves, winning 28.97% of points, while Edmund wins 25%.
- Under pressure, Broady excels, saving 53.59% of breakpoint opportunities, which might be crucial during tight games, as Edmund saves only 42.57%.
- Over the past year, their match win percentages are close, with Edmund winning 57.78% and Broady at 56.9%. Could this lead to a tight contest?
- Both players share their least successful surface on grass at 37%, but Edmund shines on indoor hard courts (69%), while Broady's best is on hard courts at 62%.
- Broady frequently participates in Futures tournaments, winning 68.29%, whereas Edmund competes mainly in Challengers, winning 66.67%.
- Head-to-head matches are evenly split, with each player securing one victory, as well as two tiebreaks won by Edmund.
- Broady has faced tougher competition, with their opponents averaging a rank of 368.81, compared to Edmund's average opponent rank of 436.78.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Broady holds a 50% win rate, while Edmund has a 40% success rate in such situations.
- Broady surpasses Edmund in breakpoint conversion, achieving a 40.36% success rate compared to Edmund’s 34.48%.
Editorial Prediction (July 9, 2025, UTC):
As Broady and Edmund once again face off, both bring unique strengths to the court. Broady's proficiency in saving breakpoints under pressure and superior breakpoint conversion rates provide an edge in critical moments.
Edmund, on the other hand, demonstrates better success when returning second serves, coupled with past experiences of clinching tiebreaks against Broady, which might play a pivotal role in this matchup.
Although both boast similar overall performances recently, Broady's resiliency and ability to handle pressure in games could prove decisive.
Ultimately, considering the comparative advantages, Broady is slightly favored to prevail in this upcoming encounter.
Edmund vs Broady Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Kyle Edmund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Jack Pinnington Jones
Player
Kyle Edmund
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
57)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Hamish Stewart
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Patrick Zahraj
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
11
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
33 of
40)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Liam Broady
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Tom Hands
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
11
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Kyle Edmund
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Kyle Edmund
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
9
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Liam Broady Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Liam Broady
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Hugo Grenier
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hugo Car
Player
Liam Broady
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Martin Damm
59%
(
58 of
99)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
110)
6
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
30%
(
30 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
110)
115
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(5) 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Liam Broady
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
14
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Liam Broady
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
9
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
52
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Jorge Plans
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Yurii Dzhavakian
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (366/238) | Win/Loss | 58% (503/371) |
| 59% (862/594) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1139/886) |
| 53% (7449/6552) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (10055/9055) |
| 57% (138/105) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (265/161) |
| 66% (141/73) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (78/64) |
| 69% (67/30) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59% (127/88) |
| 40% (20/30) | Grass Win/Loss | 36% (33/58) |
| 0.38 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 2576 | Aces Total | 2369 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1266 | Total Double Faults | 1531 |
| 1:23:5 | Average Match Time | 1:13:35 |
| 508.55 | Average Opponent Rank | 507.64 |
| 59% (21718/36546) | 1st Serve % | 63% (29087/46319) |
| 72% (15735/21718) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (19778/29087) |
| 52% (7762/14820) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (8967/17225) |
| 41% (1379/3358) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1921/4495) |
| 38% (13833/36405) | Return Points Win % | 40% (18127/45782) |
| 55% (32/26) | Slam W/L | 47% (26/29) |
| 41% (26/37) | Masters W/L | 56% (9/7) |
| 58% (7/5) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 54% (76/64) | Main Tour W/L | 46% (40/47) |
| 67% (117/58) | Challenger W/L | 56% (227/181) |
| 69% (107/47) | Futures W/L | 65% (199/105) |
| 62% (339/543) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (493/847) |
| 47% (26/55) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 35% (6/17) |
| 51% (108/212) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (136/269) |
| 47% (84/177) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (137/263) |
| 84% (379/317) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (493/428) |
| 16% (379/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (493/64) |
| 22% (225/49) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (379/75) |
Edmund vs. Broady Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
