search

Kyle Edmund vs Li Tu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Edmund vs Tu analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Want To Bet On This Match?

After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:

* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here

If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com  Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.

Kyle Edmund vs Li Tu Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Edmund 1 - 0 Tu

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Edmund has won 51.01% of points on their second serve, while Tu has won 51.96%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Edmund, in recent form, has won 53.63% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tu has won 54.07%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.57% and 31.47% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Edmund has saved 54.79% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tu has saved 59.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Edmund has won 60.87% of matches played (W/L 28/ 18), with Tu winning 56.52% (W/L 39/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Edmund has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 55/ 25), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 15/ 27). Tu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 109/ 57), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 12/ 11).
  • Player level: In the last year, Edmund has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76% of matches (W/L 19/ 6), where as Tu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 21/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Edmund winning 1 times and Tu being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Edmund winning 2 and Tu winning 0. The last match between Edmund and Tu was at the Surbiton Challenger, 02-06-2024, Q1 round, Grass with Kyle Edmund getting the victory 6-1 7-6(4).
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:57.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Edmund and Tu have played a deciding set 0 times, with Edmund winning 0 times and Tu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Edmund winning 1, and Tu 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Edmund has played against opponents with an average rank of 311.74 while Tu has played against players with an average rank of 230.54.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Edmund has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tu has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Edmund has converted 38.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tu has converted 35.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
Kyle Edmund

15

Total

0

Mast

6

Chall

0

Slam

2

Main

7

Minor

479

Rank

14

High

29

Age

R

Plays

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

1

Grass

0

210

Rank

186

High

28

Age

Plays

Li Tu

10

Total

0

Mast

1

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

9

Minor

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

1

Grass

0

L W L W W L L W W L

Form

W L W L L W L L W L

61% (338-217)

Career Total W/L

62% (163-99)

60% (21-14)

YTD W/L

53% (17-15)

$3,623,010

Career Prize Money

$179,510

2

YTD Titles

1

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For Kyle Edmund vs Li Tu For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Edmund VS Tu

Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!

Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting

Edmund VS Tu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Kyle Edmund Li Tu
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 0
Games Won 13 7
Aces (Total) 6 5
DFs Total 3 2
Avg Match Time 1:16:57 1:16:57
1st Serve % 60% (37/62) 67% (37/55)
1st Serve Win% 81% (30/37) 70% (26/37)
2nd Serve Win% 72% (18/25) 61% (11/18)
BPs Won% (Total) 100% (2/2) 0% (0/2)
Return Points W% 33% (18/55) 23% (14/62)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Edmund VS Tu H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-1 7-6(4)
cross
Kyle Edmund
Player
Li Tu
60% ( 37 of 62)
1st Serve %
67% ( 37 of 55)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
81% ( 30 of 37)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 26 of 37)
72% ( 18 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
61% ( 11 of 18)
100% ( 2 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
23% ( 14 of 62)
Rtn Points Won
33% ( 18 of 55)
66
Total Points Won
51

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Kyle Edmund Li Tu
YTD W/L 60% (21/14) 53% (17/15)
Sets Win/Loss 59% (49/34) 54% (39/33)
Games Win/Loss 53% (426/378) 52% (373/345)
Hard Win/Loss 67% (2/1) 58% (14/10)
Clay Win/Loss 44% (4/5) 50% (1/1)
Indoor Hard W/L 68% (13/6) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 50% (2/2) 33% (2/4)
Aces pg 0.36 0.42
Aces Total 143 148
DFs per game 0.27 0.13
DFs Total 107 47
Avg Match Time 1:46:26 1:34:44
Avg Opp Rank 341.29 250.91
1st Serve % 59% (1466/2492) 66% (1383/2093)
1st Serve W% 72% (1055/1466) 72% (989/1383)
2nd Serve W% 52% (534/1026) 53% (378/710)
BPs Won% Total 40% (99/248) 35% (70/199)
Return Pts W% 39% (983/2501) 38% (850/2238)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 40% (2/3)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 67% (2/1)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 43% (9/12) 29% (4/10)
Futures W/L 86% (12/2) 90% (9/1)
Best of 3 Sets W% 60% (21/35) 53% (17/32)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 36% (5/14) 41% (7/17)
Deciding Set W% 46% (6/13) 38% (3/8)
1st set W, W 75% (24/18) 89% (18/16)
1st set W, L 25% (24/6) 11% (18/2)
1st set L, W 27% (11/3) 7% (14/1)

Kyle Edmund Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
QF
cross
August Holmgren
Player
Kyle Edmund
66% ( 71 of 108)
1st Serve %
64% ( 63 of 99)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
66% ( 47 of 71)
1st Serve Won
75% ( 47 of 63)
54% ( 20 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 17 of 36)
22% ( 2 of 9)
Break Points Won
30% ( 3 of 10)
38% ( 41 of 108)
Rtn Points Won
35% ( 35 of 99)
102
Total Points Won
105
L
1-6 6-3 7-6(2) H2H
R2
cross
Kyle Edmund
Player
Max Basing
67% ( 49 of 73)
1st Serve %
79% ( 58 of 73)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67% ( 33 of 49)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 33 of 58)
50% ( 12 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
27% ( 4 of 15)
30% ( 3 of 10)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
38% ( 28 of 73)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 36 of 73)
81
Total Points Won
65
W
6-4 7-6(3) H2H
R1
cross
Kyle Edmund
Player
Louis Bowden
58% ( 40 of 69)
1st Serve %
65% ( 37 of 57)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
10
60% ( 24 of 40)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 19 of 37)
48% ( 14 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
20% ( 4 of 20)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
44% ( 4 of 9)
45% ( 31 of 69)
Rtn Points Won
60% ( 34 of 57)
72
Total Points Won
54
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Felix Gill
Player
Kyle Edmund
67% ( 51 of 76)
1st Serve %
61% ( 37 of 61)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
69% ( 35 of 51)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 26 of 37)
52% ( 13 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 13 of 24)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
37% ( 28 of 76)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 22 of 61)
70
Total Points Won
67
L
7-5 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Joao Fonseca
Player
Kyle Edmund
60% ( 26 of 43)
1st Serve %
53% ( 28 of 53)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
73% ( 19 of 26)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 14 of 28)
71% ( 12 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 10 of 25)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
28% ( 12 of 43)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 29 of 53)
60
Total Points Won
36
L
6-2 6-1 H2H
QF
cross
Kyle Edmund
Player
Ryan Peniston
58% ( 35 of 60)
1st Serve %
65% ( 36 of 55)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
83% ( 29 of 35)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 24 of 36)
48% ( 12 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
21% ( 4 of 19)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
32% ( 19 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 27 of 55)
68
Total Points Won
47
W
7-5 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Kyle Edmund
Player
Li Tu
60% ( 37 of 62)
1st Serve %
67% ( 37 of 55)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
81% ( 30 of 37)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 26 of 37)
72% ( 18 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
61% ( 11 of 18)
100% ( 2 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
23% ( 14 of 62)
Rtn Points Won
33% ( 18 of 55)
66
Total Points Won
51
W
6-1 7-6(4) H2H
QF
L
6-7(4) 6-3 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Kyle Edmund
Player
Daniel Michalski
45% ( 35 of 77)
1st Serve %
57% ( 45 of 79)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
63% ( 22 of 35)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 27 of 45)
50% ( 21 of 42)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 11 of 34)
36% ( 5 of 14)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
44% ( 34 of 77)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 41 of 79)
84
Total Points Won
72
W
6-4 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Arthur Gea
Player
Kyle Edmund
59% ( 58 of 98)
1st Serve %
61% ( 52 of 85)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
62% ( 36 of 58)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 30 of 52)
50% ( 20 of 40)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 14 of 33)
70% ( 7 of 10)
Break Points Won
45% ( 5 of 11)
43% ( 42 of 98)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 41 of 85)
97
Total Points Won
86
L
5-7 6-3 6-3 H2H

Li Tu Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
Q2
cross
Luca Van Assche
Player
Li Tu
64% ( 68 of 106)
1st Serve %
65% ( 66 of 102)
4
Aces
12
8
Double Faults
2
76% ( 52 of 68)
1st Serve Won
77% ( 51 of 66)
55% ( 21 of 38)
2nd Serve Won
64% ( 23 of 36)
50% ( 1 of 2)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
31% ( 33 of 106)
Rtn Points Won
27% ( 28 of 102)
101
Total Points Won
107
L
7-5 3-6 7-6(7) H2H
Q1
cross
Li Tu
Player
Valentin Royer
63% ( 37 of 59)
1st Serve %
65% ( 57 of 88)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
89% ( 33 of 37)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 40 of 57)
59% ( 13 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 12 of 31)
18% ( 2 of 11)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
22% ( 13 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 36 of 88)
82
Total Points Won
65
W
6-3 7-6(5) H2H
Q1
cross
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Li Tu
75% ( 91 of 122)
1st Serve %
72% ( 59 of 82)
15
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
71% ( 65 of 91)
1st Serve Won
75% ( 44 of 59)
48% ( 15 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
61% ( 14 of 23)
50% ( 2 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 6)
34% ( 42 of 122)
Rtn Points Won
29% ( 24 of 82)
104
Total Points Won
100
L
6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Alex Bolt
Player
Li Tu
69% ( 38 of 55)
1st Serve %
73% ( 36 of 49)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
79% ( 30 of 38)
1st Serve Won
42% ( 15 of 36)
35% ( 6 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 6 of 13)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 7)
35% ( 19 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 28 of 49)
64
Total Points Won
40
L
6-1 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Li Tu
Player
Hamish Stewart
79% ( 61 of 77)
1st Serve %
61% ( 41 of 67)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
9
69% ( 42 of 61)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 27 of 41)
38% ( 6 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 9 of 26)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
11% ( 1 of 9)
38% ( 29 of 77)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 31 of 67)
79
Total Points Won
65
W
6-1 7-6(6) H2H
Q1
cross
Kyle Edmund
Player
Li Tu
60% ( 37 of 62)
1st Serve %
67% ( 37 of 55)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
81% ( 30 of 37)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 26 of 37)
72% ( 18 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
61% ( 11 of 18)
100% ( 2 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
23% ( 14 of 62)
Rtn Points Won
33% ( 18 of 55)
66
Total Points Won
51
L
6-1 7-6(4) H2H
Q2
cross
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Li Tu
68% ( 34 of 50)
1st Serve %
61% ( 34 of 56)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
79% ( 27 of 34)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 18 of 34)
44% ( 7 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 11 of 22)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
32% ( 16 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 27 of 56)
61
Total Points Won
45
L
6-4 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Li Tu
Player
Oliver Crawford
64% ( 57 of 89)
1st Serve %
69% ( 75 of 108)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
75% ( 43 of 57)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 46 of 75)
50% ( 16 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 14 of 33)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
34% ( 30 of 89)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 48 of 108)
107
Total Points Won
90
W
6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Arthur Fery
Player
Li Tu
73% ( 47 of 64)
1st Serve %
68% ( 36 of 53)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70% ( 33 of 47)
1st Serve Won
72% ( 26 of 36)
47% ( 8 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 9 of 17)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
36% ( 23 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 18 of 53)
59
Total Points Won
58
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Li Tu
Player
Philip Sekulic
72% ( 48 of 67)
1st Serve %
56% ( 35 of 62)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
71% ( 34 of 48)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 23 of 35)
53% ( 10 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 11 of 27)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
14% ( 1 of 7)
34% ( 23 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 28 of 62)
72
Total Points Won
57
W
7-5 6-2 H2H

Edmund Vs Tu Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Edmund are available here and Tu photos here.


Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions