Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kyle Edmund vs Jason Jung Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Edmund vs Jung analysis and find out who is favored!
Kyle Edmund vs Jason Jung Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Edmund has won 51.42% of points on his second serve, while Jung has won 53.91%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Edmund, in recent form, has won 50.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jung has won 55.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.39% and 33.04% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Edmund has saved 61.01% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jung has saved 62.9% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Edmund has won 62.79% of matches played (W/L 27/ 16), with Jung winning 64.15% (W/L 34/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Edmund has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 55/ 25), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 34% (W/L 13/ 25). Jung has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 307/ 218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 20/ 26).
- Player level: In the last year, Edmund has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 78.57% of matches (W/L 22/ 6), where as Jung has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.89% of matches (W/L 23/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Edmund winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Edmund winning 3 and Jung winning 2. The last match between Edmund and Jung was at the Erste Bank Open - Vienna, 24-10-2020, Q1 round, I.hard with Jason Jung getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:6:40.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Edmund and Jung have played a deciding set 1 times, with Edmund winning 0 times and Jung 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Edmund winning 1, and Jung 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Edmund has played against opponents with an average rank of 308.09 while Jung has played against players with an average rank of 291.6.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Edmund has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jung has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Edmund has converted 39.73% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jung has converted 43.42% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Edmund 1 - 1 Jung
420
Rank
14
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
271
Rank
114
High
34
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
61% (332-212)
Career Total W/L
56% (412-327)
63% (15-9)
YTD W/L
67% (4-2)
$3,623,010
Career Prize Money
$350,585
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kyle Edmund | Jason Jung |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 25 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 18 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:6:40 | 1:6:40 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (65/102) | 66% (68/103) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (45/65) | 66% (45/68) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 35% (13/37) | 57% (20/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (38/103) | 43% (44/102) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(2) 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Jason Jung
Player
Kyle Edmund
66%
(
68 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
2
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
38 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
102)
109
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kyle Edmund | Jason Jung |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (15/9) | 67% (4/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (34/24) | 67% (8/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (299/256) | 55% (64/52) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (13/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0.39 |
| Aces Total | 121 | 22 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 66 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:11 | 1:26:41 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 368.13 | 330.67 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1052/1793) | 65% (233/358) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (775/1052) | 72% (168/233) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (390/741) | 55% (69/125) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (65/167) | 38% (15/40) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (673/1795) | 39% (148/383) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 38% (5/8) | 67% (4/2) |
| Futures W/L | 91% (10/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (15/24) | 67% (4/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 20% (2/10) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (15/12) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (15/3) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 0% (2/0) |
Kyle Edmund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Kyle Edmund
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Kyle Edmund
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Johannes Ingildsen
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Kyle Edmund
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Gerald Melzer
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Kyle Edmund
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
28%
(
22 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Denis Yevseyev
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Andrea Picchione
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Kyle Edmund
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jason Jung Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Jason Jung
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
13
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Ryan Peniston
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Aziz Dougaz
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Maximus Jones
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Manuel Guinard
Player
Jason Jung
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
9
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Nick Hardt
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Jason Jung
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Yunseong Chung
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
101)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
9 of
36)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
52 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(2) 6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Zdenek Kolar
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Edmund Vs Jung Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
