Kyle Edmund vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Edmund vs Gimeno-Traver analysis and find out who is favored!
Kyle Edmund vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Edmund has won 52.58% of points on his second serve, while Gimeno-Traver has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Edmund, in recent form, has won 50.6% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gimeno-Traver has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.38% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Edmund has saved 65.52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gimeno-Traver has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Edmund has won 62.79% of matches played (W/L 27/ 16), with Gimeno-Traver winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Edmund has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 55/ 25), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 34% (W/L 13/ 25). Gimeno-Traver has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 578/ 369), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 6/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Edmund has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 77.42% of matches (W/L 24/ 7), where as Gimeno-Traver has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Edmund winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Edmund winning 4 and Gimeno-Traver winning 1. The last match between Edmund and Gimeno-Traver was at the Millennium Estoril Open - Estoril, 26-04-2016, First, Clay with Kyle Edmund getting the victory 1100037117.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:43:55.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Edmund and Gimeno-Traver have played a deciding set 1 times, with Edmund winning 1 times and Gimeno-Traver 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Edmund winning 0, and Gimeno-Traver 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Edmund has played against opponents with an average rank of 299.65 while Gimeno-Traver has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Edmund has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gimeno-Traver has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Edmund has converted 41.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gimeno-Traver has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Edmund 2 - 0 Gimeno-Traver
15
Total
0
Mast
6
Chall
0
Slam
2
Main
7
Minor
398
Rank
14
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
48
High
38
Age
R
Plays
24
Total
0
Mast
14
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
10
Minor
Form
61% (330-209)
Career Total W/L
57% (625-479)
68% (13-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,623,010
Career Prize Money
$1,102,200
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Edmund VS Gimeno-Traver H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Kyle Edmund | Daniel Gimeno-Traver |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
Games Won | 31 | 22 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 0:43:55 | 0:43:55 |
1st Serve % | 49% (32/65) | 52% (33/63) |
1st Serve Win% | 66% (21/32) | 70% (23/33) |
2nd Serve Win% | 58% (19/33) | 30% (9/30) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 50% (3/6) |
Return Points W% | 49% (31/63) | 38% (25/65) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Edmund VS Gimeno-Traver H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 7-5 |
Kyle Edmund
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Kyle Edmund | Daniel Gimeno-Traver |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 68% (13/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 62% (29/18) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (256/211) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (13/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.45 | 0 |
Aces Total | 104 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.21 | 0 |
DFs Total | 48 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:57:47 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 354.21 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 58% (870/1496) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 76% (659/870) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 53% (333/626) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 40% (53/133) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (545/1492) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 91% (10/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (13/19) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 20% (2/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 43% (7/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Kyle Edmund Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Marko Topo
Player
Kyle Edmund
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
28%
(
22 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
QF |
Kyle Edmund
Player
Denis Yevseyev
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kyle Edmund
Player
Andrea Picchione
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Titouan Droguet
Player
Kyle Edmund
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Stuart Parker
Player
Kyle Edmund
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
94)
16
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
91%
(
52 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
17 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kyle Edmund
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
9
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Joris De Loore
Player
Kyle Edmund
73%
(
79 of
108)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
107)
18
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
64 of
79)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
51 of
71)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
26 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
30 of
107)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(4) 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
F |
Kyle Edmund
Player
Hamish Stewart
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
0
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
44 of
52)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
51 of
64)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
23 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
101)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Kyle Edmund
Player
Jonas Forejtek
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
101)
6
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Daniel Gimeno-Traver Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
37%
(
18 of
49)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mario Vilella Martinez
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Viktor Galovic
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
17%
(
6 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Pol Toledo Bague
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
5
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Fabien Reboul
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
12
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H |
view more