Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kyle Edmund vs Adrian Menendez-Maceiras Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Edmund vs Menendez-Maceiras analysis and find out who is favored!
Kyle Edmund vs Adrian Menendez-Maceiras Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Edmund has won 50.96% of points on his second serve, while Menendez-Maceiras has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Edmund, in recent form, has won 50.47% of his opponent's second serve points, while Menendez-Maceiras has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.25% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Edmund has saved 60.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Menendez-Maceiras has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Edmund has won 62.79% of matches played (W/L 27/ 16), with Menendez-Maceiras winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Edmund has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 55/ 25), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 34% (W/L 13/ 25). Menendez-Maceiras has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 319/ 210), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 14/ 23).
- Player level: In the last year, Edmund has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 78.57% of matches (W/L 22/ 6), where as Menendez-Maceiras has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Edmund winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Edmund winning 3 and Menendez-Maceiras winning 2. The last match between Edmund and Menendez-Maceiras was at the French Open - Paris, 22-05-2015, Q3, Clay with Kyle Edmund getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:4:43.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Edmund and Menendez-Maceiras have played a deciding set 1 times, with Edmund winning 0 times and Menendez-Maceiras 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Edmund winning 0, and Menendez-Maceiras 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Edmund has played against opponents with an average rank of 308.09 while Menendez-Maceiras has played against players with an average rank of 144.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Edmund has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Menendez-Maceiras has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Edmund has converted 39.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Menendez-Maceiras has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Edmund 1 - 1 Menendez-Maceiras
420
Rank
14
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
865
Rank
111
High
38
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
61% (332-212)
Career Total W/L
55% (608-500)
63% (15-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,623,010
Career Prize Money
$504,829
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Edmund VS Menendez-Maceiras H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Kyle Edmund | Adrian Menendez-Maceiras |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 28 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 13 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:4:43 | 1:4:43 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (104/160) | 59% (80/135) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (75/104) | 75% (60/80) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (34/56) | 60% (33/55) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (5/5) | 17% (2/12) |
| Return Points W% | 31% (42/135) | 32% (51/160) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
Edmund VS Menendez-Maceiras H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Kyle Edmund
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| 4-6 6-4 7-6(4) |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Kyle Edmund
52%
(
45 of
87)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
108)
8
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
89%
(
40 of
45)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
54 of
72)
67%
(
28 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
9%
(
1 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
19 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
34 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kyle Edmund | Adrian Menendez-Maceiras |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (15/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (34/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (299/256) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (13/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 121 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 66 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:11 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 368.13 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1052/1793) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (775/1052) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (390/741) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (65/167) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (673/1795) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 38% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 91% (10/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (15/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 20% (2/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (15/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (15/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Kyle Edmund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Kyle Edmund
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Kyle Edmund
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Johannes Ingildsen
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Kyle Edmund
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Gerald Melzer
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Kyle Edmund
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
28%
(
22 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Denis Yevseyev
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Andrea Picchione
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Kyle Edmund
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
51%
(
62 of
121)
1st Serve %
56%
(
65 of
116)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
59%
(
35 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
41 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
42 of
116)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Daniil Glinka
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
3
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Skander Mansouri
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
0
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Ben Jones
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
9
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
43%
(
20 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Matthew William Donald
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Edmund Vs Menendez-Maceiras Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
