J. Plans
To Win
K. Cekirge
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W L L WForm
W W L W W L W W W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Cekirge winning 2 and Ortega winning 0. The last match between Cekirge and Ortega was at the M25 Sabadell, 29-04-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Kuzey Cekirge getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Kuzey Cekirge | 1 |
Xavi Matas Ortega | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Sabadell(29-04-2025)
Cekirge | Stats | Ortega |
---|---|---|
65% (13-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 66% (23-12) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
N/A | Ranking | N/A |
Highest Rank | N/A | |
25 | Age | 22 |
- | Plays | - |
0 | Titles | 0 |
61% (236-154) | Career Total W/L | 58% (127-93) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
- / Second
Rothesay International - Eastbourne wta
24 Jun 2025 / First
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
24 Jun 2025 / Second
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Xavi Matas Ortega
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 9 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:47:52 | Average Match Time | 1:47:52 |
56% (35/63) | 1st Serve % | 71% (48/68) |
71% (25/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (27/48) |
57% (16/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (10/20) |
56% (5/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
46% (31/68) | Return Points Win % | 35% (22/63) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Examining the recent form over the past six months, Cekirge demonstrates a slightly stronger performance on their second serve compared to Ortega, winning 45.27% of points, while Ortega manages 44.54%. The ability to win points on the second serve is often highly predictive of match outcomes.
In terms of return game statistics, Cekirge has an advantage, having secured 46.13% of points on their opponent's second serve, compared to Ortega's 33.33%. Their proficiency in breaking the first serve is nearly identical, with Cekirge at 32.45% and Ortega at 32.2%. These return stats are instrumental in determining the favored player in head-to-head matchups.
Looking at their performance under pressure, Cekirge has successfully saved 46.11% of breakpoints, whereas Ortega boasts a slightly better 46.67% save rate. This statistic is key for placing in-game bets, particularly during critical points of a match.
Over the past year, Cekirge's match winning percentage is notable at 64.06% (W/L 41/23), slightly outpacing Ortega's 58.82% (W/L 20/14). This overall match performance can effectively contribute to a head-to-head prediction framework.
Focusing on their favorite playing surfaces, Cekirge performs best on clay, with a 63% win rate (W/L 160/93), although their performance dips on hard courts to 55% (W/L 69/57). Conversely, Ortega also excels on clay with a 59% win rate (W/L 86/60) but struggles on indoor hard courts, having lost their sole match. The surface type plays a crucial role in anticipating match outcomes.
Assessing opponent quality, Cekirge has faced players with an average rank of 251.59 over the past year, while Ortega has encountered opponents ranked at an average of 113.62. This insight is valuable for determining the relative challenge each player faces during competitions.
If the match enters a deciding set, Cekirge has shown remarkable resilience, winning 76% of such sets, unlike Ortega, who has a 38% deciding set win rate. This statistic is particularly useful for live betting predictions.
As for break point conversion, Cekirge has been more efficient recently, converting 43.16% of opportunities to break serve compared to Ortega's 40%. This metric can offer valuable insights for live betting when either player is on the cusp of breaking their opponent's serve.
Given these comparative stats, it is anticipated that Cekirge holds the upper hand and is likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match. Their superior performance in key areas provides a strong basis for this prediction.
Cekirge vs Ortega Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Luis Garcia Paez
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Miguel Damas
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
60)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Sergi Perez Contri
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
71%
(
25 of
35)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
39
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Charlie Valentine
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Rares Teodor Pieleanu
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
0
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
0
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Mario Martinez Serrano
Player
Xavi Matas Ortega
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve %
76%
(
25 of
33)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
6 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
35
Total Points Won
27
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | w/o | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Imanol Lopez Morillo
Player
Xavi Matas Ortega
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
61% (236/154) | Win/Loss | 58% (127/93) |
58% (515/368) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (284/198) |
53% (4435/3969) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (2379/1962) |
55% (71/58) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (34/29) |
63% (165/96) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (93/63) |
0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
325 | Aces Total | 64 |
0.08 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.09 |
334 | Total Double Faults | 188 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
255.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 234.84 |
63% (6489/10319) | 1st Serve % | 70% (3740/5345) |
63% (4079/6489) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (2202/3740) |
46% (1767/3830) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (709/1605) |
43% (465/1074) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (250/563) |
41% (4219/10208) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2135/5106) |
0% (0/2) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
61% (236/152) | Futures W/L | 58% (127/93) |
60% (232/385) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (125/208) |
100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/4) |
54% (33/61) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (14/26) |
57% (58/102) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (20/47) |
88% (230/203) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (133/113) |
12% (230/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (133/18) |
21% (160/33) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (87/15) |