C. Cavelli
To Win
H. Sato
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W W W L W LForm
L L W L W L W L W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Voznyak winning 2 and Cavelli winning 0. The last match between Voznyak and Cavelli was at the W15 Bucharest, 18-02-2025, Q3, I.hard with Kristina Voznyak getting the victory 6-3 7-6(5).
W15 Bucharest(18-02-2025)
18 Mar 2025 / First
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
Miami Open - Miami atp
19 Mar 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 7-6(5) |
![]() ![]()
Kristina Voznyak
Player
Carola Cavelli
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Predictions and Insights for the Upcoming Tennis Match:
Over the course of the last six months, it has been observed that Voznyak has managed to secure victory in 33.33% of the points played on their second serve. On the other hand, Cavelli has demonstrated a slightly superior performance, winning 36.46% of such points. This statistical finding holds substantial significance as it possesses a notable correlation with the accuracy of match predictions.
Considering recent form, Voznyak has triumphed in an impressive 57.38% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cavelli has achieved a commendable success rate of 52.85%. Moreover, when it comes to first serve returns, Voznyak has maintained a solid performance percentage of 38.18%, surpassing Cavelli's rate of 34.47%. These precise figures have proven to be instrumental in determining the player who possesses an advantage in their head-to-head (H2H) matchup.
When subjected to intense pressure situations, Voznyak has emerged successful in saving an impressive 47.56% of breakpoints throughout their recent form. In a similar vein, Cavelli has displayed a slightly enhanced resilience, saving 48.54% of breakpoints. This particular statistical insight serves as a valuable tool in predicting the outcome of in-game betting scenarios.
A comprehensive examination of the performances delivered over the past year showcases Voznyak's success rate of 51.35% in their matches played (with 19 wins and 18 losses), while Cavelli boasts a slightly higher success rate of 52.78% (with 19 wins and 17 losses). Such substantial figures extensively contribute to our overall prediction and analysis of their head-to-head encounter.
Considering their career performance, Voznyak has exhibited a commendable winning percentage of 58% on clay courts (with 15 wins and 11 losses), making it their most successful surface. However, their performance on indoor hard courts has been comparatively weaker, recording a win rate of only 47% (with 7 wins and 8 losses). Conversely, Cavelli has experienced the utmost success rate of 50% on indoor hard courts (with 2 wins and 2 losses), while struggling on clay courts, securing a victory in only 36% of matches (with 16 wins and 28 losses).
Over the past year, Voznyak has predominantly competed in tournaments at the Futures, Satellites, and ITF level, particularly within the $10K range. They have achieved an impressive success rate of 62.96% in these matches (with 17 wins and 10 losses). In contrast, Cavelli has also participated mostly in tournaments at the Futures, Satellites, and ITF level, with a success rate of 53.13% (17 wins and 15 losses). While comparing player statistics to determine the favorite, it is essential to consider the relative event level they have been contending at.
Over the course of the last 12 months, Voznyak has faced opponents with an average ranking of 242.57, indicating a reasonably competitive lineup. Comparison with Cavelli reveals that they have similarly confronted players with an average ranking of 239.22. These competitor quality statistics shed light on the overall caliber of players faced by each contender.
In the event that this particular match extends to a deciding set, it is worth noting that Voznyak has attained victory in 27% of such sets over the past 12 months. On the other hand, Cavelli has achieved a remarkable success rate of 56% in all matches played throughout their tour. This information is particularly valuable for those interested in live predictions and betting scenarios.
While historical player performance is undoubtedly essential in predicting tennis matches, once an event is in progress, it becomes crucial to consider current event statistics to gauge the form and momentum of each player. Therefore, it is advisable to refer to the section below (link) for updated information if the players have already participated in matches during the ongoing event. Additionally, it is worth considering that certain players exhibit superior performances in particular events, establishing a key factor in determining the match outcome.
Recent observations highlight Voznyak's ability to successfully convert 45.9% of their breakpoint opportunities. Similarly, Cavelli has displayed a comparable conversion rate of 45.33% when presented with chances to break their opponent's serve. This insightful statistic plays a significant role in live betting tips, particularly when either player encounters a breakpoint opportunity.
If you possess an interest in exploring models that accurately predict tennis match outcomes, this informative article is an excellent resource to delve into. However, it is important to note that its content caters specifically to passionate enthusiasts with a penchant for detailed statistical analysis.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Marine Szostak
Player
Kristina Voznyak
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
78%
(
67 of
86)
4
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
3
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
43 of
86)
101
Total Points Won
85
|
6-7(2) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Kristina Voznyak
Player
Carola Cavelli
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 0-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Polina Iatcenko
Player
Kristina Voznyak
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-7(5) 10-7 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Anastasia Sukhotina
Player
Kristina Voznyak
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Noemi La Cagnina
Player
Carola Cavelli
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
12
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Julie Pastikova
Player
Carola Cavelli
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Camilla Zanolini
Player
Carola Cavelli
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Kristina Voznyak
Player
Carola Cavelli
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 3-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Stephanie Judith Visscher
Player
Carola Cavelli
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kaat Coppez
Player
Carola Cavelli
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H |
view more
View full predicted draw for Cavelli