Prediction of Kristina Novak [889th] vs Rasheeda Mcadoo [495th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L W L L
Form
W L W L L L W L W LHead To Head: Novak 1 - 0 Mcadoo
They have played 2 sets in total, with Novak winning 2 and Mcadoo winning 0. The last match between Novak and Mcadoo was at the W75 Maribor, 16-03-2025, Q1 round, I.hard with Kristina Novak getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kristina Novak | 1 |
| Rasheeda Mcadoo | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Kristina Novak
Player
Rasheeda Mcadoo
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:54:52 | Average Match Time | 1:54:52 |
| 66% (42/64) | 1st Serve % | 52% (40/77) |
| 69% (29/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (27/40) |
| 45% (10/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (13/37) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
| 48% (37/77) | Return Points Win % | 39% (25/64) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kristina Novak vs Rasheeda Mcadoo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Novak 1 - 0 Mcadoo
Editorial Prediction:
In assessing the upcoming match between Novak and Mcadoo, a detailed analysis of their recent form sheds light on likely outcomes. Over the past six months, Novak secured 38.58% of points on his second serve, narrowly trailing Mcadoo who achieved 40.44%. The ability to win points on second serves strongly influences match predictions.
When considering return game statistics, Novak claimed 48.43% of his opponent's second serve points, which is almost equivalent to Mcadoo's 48.5%. However, Novak surpassed Mcadoo on first serve returns with 32.76% compared to Mcadoo's 26.73%, a critical metric in head-to-head matchups. This superior performance could indicate an edge for Novak in return games.
Both players have shown resilience under pressure when saving breakpoints, with Mcadoo leading slightly, saving 47.98% as opposed to Novak's 45.39%. Such resilience is pivotal in predicting match outcomes and is valuable for in-game betting insights. Additionally, regarding performance overview, Mcadoo demonstrates a stronger overall record over the past year with a win rate of 61.67% to Novak's 52.38%.
Surface familiarity also plays a role in match outcomes. Novak's best surface performance is on Hard courts, achieving a win rate of 50% (W/L 14/14), while his weaker performance is on Indoor Hard courts at 43% (W/L 9/12). Conversely, Mcadoo excels on Indoor Hard courts with a 56% win rate (W/L 15/12) but shows slightly lesser proficiency on Hard courts at 51% (W/L 75/72).
Assessing player level and opponent quality, Novak often competes in Challengers/ITF tournaments, achieving a 55.56% win rate (W/L 15/12), while Mcadoo shows strength in similar tournaments with a 61.67% win rate (W/L 37/23). However, Novak's opponents have had an average rank of 304.33, which surpasses the rank of Mcadoo's opponents at 422.8.
A decisive factor in potential match outcomes is performance in deciding sets. Mcadoo holds a definite advantage winning 60% of deciding sets over the past year, compared to Novak's 33%. Such statistics are informative for live predictions and betting as the match progresses. Additionally, Novak excels in breakpoint conversion with 35.87%, compared to Mcadoo's 32.84%, a key indicator during critical game moments.
Based on the compiled statistics, Mcadoo appears to have a marginal advantage both in matchup performance and in handling pressure situations. Combined with a superior win rate and performance in deciding sets, Mcadoo is predicted to be the favored player to win this match.
Kristina Novak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Raluca Georgiana Serban
Player
Kristina Novak
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karina Miller
Player
Kristina Novak
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
89)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kristina Novak
Player
Tereza Martincova
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve %
94%
(
15 of
16)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
8 of
12)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
13 of
15)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
13
Total Points Won
21
|
7-6(9) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arianne Hartono
Player
Kristina Novak
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
69)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
6
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kristina Novak
Player
Radka Zelnickova
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kristina Novak
Player
Rasheeda Mcadoo
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kristina Novak
Player
Mariya Poduraeva
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Rasheeda Mcadoo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Klimovicova
Player
Rasheeda Mcadoo
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Lina Glushko
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilla Rosatello
Player
Rasheeda Mcadoo
57%
(
50 of
87)
1st Serve %
51%
(
45 of
88)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Nadiya Kolb
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kristina Novak
Player
Rasheeda Mcadoo
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aneta Laboutkova
Player
Rasheeda Mcadoo
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
1
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
5
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Rasheeda Mcadoo
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Ivana Jorovic
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Rasheeda Mcadoo
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Dalila Jakupovic
50%
(
42 of
84)
1st Serve %
74%
(
64 of
87)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
36%
(
15 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48% (68/73) | Win/Loss | 52% (178/164) |
| 50% (157/157) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (407/373) |
| 50% (1476/1490) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3736/3452) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 121 | Aces Total | 877 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 456 | Total Double Faults | 875 |
| 1:3:2 | Average Match Time | 1:22:36 |
| 396.62 | Average Opponent Rank | 469.35 |
| 57% (3565/6226) | 1st Serve % | 55% (9626/17485) |
| 59% (2118/3565) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (6223/9626) |
| 40% (1066/2661) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (3648/7858) |
| 47% (356/750) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (902/1854) |
| 45% (2709/5986) | Return Points Win % | 44% (7318/16677) |
| 48% (68/141) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (173/335) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 57% (16/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (29/65) |
| 34% (11/32) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (46/101) |
| 87% (75/65) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (187/154) |
| 13% (75/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (187/32) |
| 5% (66/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (155/24) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
