E. Zhu
To Win
K. Isomura
To Win
Kokoro Isomura vs Naoki Tajima Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W L L W L W
Form
L L W W L L W W L LH2H: Isomura 1 - 0 Tajima
They have played 2 sets in total, with Isomura winning 2 and Tajima winning 0. The last match between Isomura and Tajima was at the M15 Karuizawa, 29-05-2024, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Kokoro Isomura getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kokoro Isomura | 1 |
| Naoki Tajima | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M15 Karuizawa(29-05-2024)
Kokoro Isomura
Naoki Tajima
6
2
6
1
| Isomura | Stats | Tajima |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (17-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 61% (23-15) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 470 | Ranking | 881 |
| 448 | Highest Rank | 604 |
| 22 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 54% (111-93) | Career Total W/L | 50% (155-157) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
- / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fearnley VS Moutet PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Popyrin VS Draper PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kokoro Isomura Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Kokoro Isomura
Player
Rigele Te
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
Player
Kokoro Isomura
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
10
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kokoro Isomura
Player
Xirui Han
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hoyoung Roh
Player
Kokoro Isomura
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Linang Xiao
Player
Kokoro Isomura
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kokoro Isomura
Player
Tianhui Zhang
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
76
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kokoro Isomura
Player
Saki Tange
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
72%
(
28 of
39)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kokoro Isomura
Player
Xirui Han
71%
(
61 of
86)
1st Serve %
50%
(
42 of
84)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Naoki Tajima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Naoki Tajima
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve %
46%
(
11 of
24)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
4 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
32
Total Points Won
13
|
6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johannus Monday
Player
Naoki Tajima
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
11
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 4-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Gian Marco Ortenzi
Player
Naoki Tajima
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Naoki Tajima
Player
Andrea Militi Ribaldi
53%
(
37 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
82
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (111/93) | Win/Loss | 50% (155/157) |
| 52% (239/218) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (354/350) |
| 51% (2127/2021) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (3251/3228) |
| 53% (80/72) | Hard Win/Loss | 51% (114/108) |
| 58% (25/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 48% (33/36) |
| 67% (6/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (7/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 242 | Aces Total | 788 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 465 | Total Double Faults | 864 |
| 1:40:45 | Average Match Time | 1:16:24 |
| 437.33 | Average Opponent Rank | 405 |
| 69% (8581/12445) | 1st Serve % | 54% (8337/15500) |
| 62% (5333/8581) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (5619/8337) |
| 47% (1834/3863) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3414/7162) |
| 47% (650/1381) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (695/1502) |
| 43% (5401/12666) | Return Points Win % | 40% (6269/15625) |
| 56% (14/11) | Challenger W/L | 25% (4/12) |
| 54% (97/82) | Futures W/L | 51% (151/145) |
| 54% (108/200) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (151/304) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 61% (31/51) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (28/47) |
| 63% (32/51) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (36/81) |
| 93% (100/93) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (159/133) |
| 7% (100/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (159/26) |
| 17% (104/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (153/21) |
Isomura vs. Tajima Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
