MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Kody Pearson [862nd] vs Sam Young-Mathers [] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

H2H: Pearson 1 - 0 Young-Mathers

They have played 3 sets in total, with Pearson winning 2 and Young-Mathers winning 1. The last match between Pearson and Young-Mathers was at the M25 Launceston, 23-02-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Kody Pearson getting the victory 6-7(6) 6-1 12-10.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Kody Pearson 1
Sam Young-Mathers 0
Pearson vs Young-Mathers H2H Profile
Pearson Stats Young-Mathers
50% (7-7) YTD Win/Loss 40% (2-3)
1 Head-to-Head 0
862 Ranking N/A
790 Highest Rank N/A
25 Age 21
R Plays -
0 Titles 0
50% (122-120) Career Total W/L 41% (7-10)
$0 Career Prize Money $0
1 Hard H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Pearson VS Young-Mathers H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-7(6) 6-1 12-10

Pearson VS Young-Mathers H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Pearson Vs Young-Mathers H2H Stats
Kody Pearson Pearson Stats Sam Young-Mathers Young-Mathers
1 H2H Matches 0
2 Sets Won 1
24 Games Won 18
0 Aces (Total) 0
0 Total Double Faults 0
0:0:0 Average Match Time 0:0:0
0% (0/0) 1st Serve % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Serve Win % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 2nd Serve Win % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Break Points Won % (Total) 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Return Points Win % 0% (0/0)
100% (1/1) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/1)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/1) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 100% (1/1)
100% (1/1) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/1)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (1/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 100% (1/1)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (0/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Kody Pearson vs Sam Young-Mathers Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Pearson 1 - 0 Young-Mathers

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pearson has won 38.75% of points on their second serve, while Young-Mathers has won 27.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pearson, in recent form, has won 47.94% of their opponent's second serve points, while Young-Mathers has won 52.94%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.85% and 30% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Pearson has saved 48.63% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Young-Mathers has saved 25% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Pearson has won 40.54% of matches played (W/L 15/ 22), with Young-Mathers winning 44.44% (W/L 4/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Pearson has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 55% (W/L 6/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Young-Mathers has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 7/ 9), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
  • Player level: In the last year, Pearson has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45.16% of matches (W/L 14/ 17), where as Young-Mathers has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 4/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pearson winning 1 times and Young-Mathers being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Pearson winning 2 and Young-Mathers winning 1. The last match between Pearson and Young-Mathers was at the M25 Launceston, 23-02-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Kody Pearson getting the victory 6-7(6) 6-1 12-10.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Pearson and Young-Mathers have played a deciding set 1 times, with Pearson winning 1 times and Young-Mathers 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Pearson winning 0, and Young-Mathers 1.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pearson has played against opponents with an average rank of 381.05 while Young-Mathers has played against players with an average rank of 284.33.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pearson has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Young-Mathers has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Pearson has converted 33.66% of breakpoint opportunities, and Young-Mathers has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Kody Pearson Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    R1
    cross
    Oliver Crawford
    Player
    Kody Pearson
    72% ( 95 of 132)
    1st Serve %
    53% ( 62 of 116)
    7
    Aces
    5
    3
    Double Faults
    9
    63% ( 60 of 95)
    1st Serve Won
    74% ( 46 of 62)
    51% ( 19 of 37)
    2nd Serve Won
    54% ( 29 of 54)
    33% ( 4 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    31% ( 4 of 13)
    40% ( 53 of 132)
    Rtn Points Won
    35% ( 41 of 116)
    120
    Total Points Won
    128
    L
    4-6 7-6(2) 7-5 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Kody Pearson
    Player
    Atharva Sharma
    67% ( 40 of 60)
    1st Serve %
    72% ( 47 of 65)
    0
    Aces
    2
    5
    Double Faults
    1
    73% ( 29 of 40)
    1st Serve Won
    57% ( 27 of 47)
    45% ( 9 of 20)
    2nd Serve Won
    39% ( 7 of 18)
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    40% ( 2 of 5)
    37% ( 22 of 60)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 31 of 65)
    69
    Total Points Won
    56
    W
    6-1 4-6 12-10 H2H
    Q1
    W
    6-2 6-2 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Minjong Park
    Player
    Kody Pearson
    58% ( 46 of 79)
    1st Serve %
    69% ( 46 of 67)
    0
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    3
    72% ( 33 of 46)
    1st Serve Won
    76% ( 35 of 46)
    52% ( 17 of 33)
    2nd Serve Won
    38% ( 8 of 21)
    100% ( 2 of 2)
    Break Points Won
    14% ( 1 of 7)
    37% ( 29 of 79)
    Rtn Points Won
    36% ( 24 of 67)
    74
    Total Points Won
    72
    L
    6-4 7-6(5) H2H
    Q2
    cross
    Kody Pearson
    Player
    Vullnet Tashi
    57% ( 39 of 68)
    1st Serve %
    45% ( 31 of 69)
    8
    Aces
    0
    2
    Double Faults
    10
    72% ( 28 of 39)
    1st Serve Won
    68% ( 21 of 31)
    45% ( 13 of 29)
    2nd Serve Won
    34% ( 13 of 38)
    67% ( 4 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 3 of 9)
    40% ( 27 of 68)
    Rtn Points Won
    51% ( 35 of 69)
    76
    Total Points Won
    61
    W
    4-6 6-1 11-9 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Scott Jones
    Player
    Kody Pearson
    68% ( 51 of 75)
    1st Serve %
    70% ( 43 of 61)
    0
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    63% ( 32 of 51)
    1st Serve Won
    56% ( 24 of 43)
    38% ( 9 of 24)
    2nd Serve Won
    56% ( 10 of 18)
    80% ( 4 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    45% ( 34 of 75)
    Rtn Points Won
    44% ( 27 of 61)
    68
    Total Points Won
    68
    L
    6-4 4-6 10-6 H2H
    Q1
    W
    6-7(6) 6-1 12-10 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Dane Sweeny
    Player
    Kody Pearson
    69% ( 31 of 45)
    1st Serve %
    68% ( 41 of 60)
    2
    Aces
    2
    0
    Double Faults
    4
    71% ( 22 of 31)
    1st Serve Won
    56% ( 23 of 41)
    64% ( 9 of 14)
    2nd Serve Won
    21% ( 4 of 19)
    36% ( 5 of 14)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    31% ( 14 of 45)
    Rtn Points Won
    55% ( 33 of 60)
    64
    Total Points Won
    41
    L
    6-0 6-2 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Naoki Nakagawa
    Player
    Kody Pearson
    60% ( 49 of 82)
    1st Serve %
    75% ( 50 of 67)
    4
    Aces
    1
    3
    Double Faults
    5
    63% ( 31 of 49)
    1st Serve Won
    62% ( 31 of 50)
    52% ( 17 of 33)
    2nd Serve Won
    29% ( 5 of 17)
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    30% ( 3 of 10)
    41% ( 34 of 82)
    Rtn Points Won
    46% ( 31 of 67)
    79
    Total Points Won
    70
    L
    6-4 7-5 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Kody Pearson
    Player
    Keisuke Saitoh
    65% ( 34 of 52)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 31 of 50)
    1
    Aces
    0
    3
    Double Faults
    3
    74% ( 25 of 34)
    1st Serve Won
    55% ( 17 of 31)
    39% ( 7 of 18)
    2nd Serve Won
    16% ( 3 of 19)
    46% ( 6 of 13)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 2 of 8)
    38% ( 20 of 52)
    Rtn Points Won
    60% ( 30 of 50)
    62
    Total Points Won
    40
    W
    6-3 6-1 H2H

    Sam Young-Mathers Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    Q1
    L
    6-3 6-1 H2H
    Q1
    L
    6-7(6) 6-1 12-10 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Matthew Hulme
    Player
    Sam Young-Mathers
    80% ( 37 of 46)
    1st Serve %
    67% ( 31 of 46)
    2
    Aces
    1
    1
    Double Faults
    0
    70% ( 26 of 37)
    1st Serve Won
    52% ( 16 of 31)
    56% ( 5 of 9)
    2nd Serve Won
    20% ( 3 of 15)
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    20% ( 1 of 5)
    33% ( 15 of 46)
    Rtn Points Won
    59% ( 27 of 46)
    58
    Total Points Won
    34
    L
    6-2 6-1 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Sam Young-Mathers
    Player
    Ethan Cook
    63% ( 43 of 68)
    1st Serve %
    64% ( 39 of 61)
    3
    Aces
    4
    2
    Double Faults
    1
    70% ( 30 of 43)
    1st Serve Won
    69% ( 27 of 39)
    44% ( 11 of 25)
    2nd Serve Won
    32% ( 7 of 22)
    100% ( 4 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    43% ( 3 of 7)
    40% ( 27 of 68)
    Rtn Points Won
    44% ( 27 of 61)
    68
    Total Points Won
    61
    W
    6-2 4-6 10-8 H2H
    Q1
    W
    7-6(2) ret. H2H
    Q2
    L
    6-2 6-1 H2H
    Q1
    W
    5-1 ret. H2H
    Q2
    L
    7-6(4) 6-2 H2H
    Q1
    W
    6-1 6-3 H2H
    Q2
    cross
    Andre Szilvassy
    Player
    Sam Young-Mathers
    49% ( 19 of 39)
    1st Serve %
    61% ( 19 of 31)
    0
    Aces
    1
    4
    Double Faults
    1
    58% ( 11 of 19)
    1st Serve Won
    26% ( 5 of 19)
    70% ( 14 of 20)
    2nd Serve Won
    17% ( 2 of 12)
    100% ( 6 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 1 of 2)
    36% ( 14 of 39)
    Rtn Points Won
    77% ( 24 of 31)
    49
    Total Points Won
    21
    L
    6-1 6-0 H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Pearson & Young-Mathers Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Kody Pearson Pearson Stats Sam Young-Mathers Young-Mathers
    50% (122/120) Win/Loss 41% (7/10)
    50% (274/274) Sets Win/Loss 37% (13/22)
    51% (2618/2518) Games Win/Loss 43% (142/185)
    0.16 Aces Per Game 0.03
    396 Aces Total 5
    0.26 Double Faults Per Game 0.02
    644 Total Double Faults 3
    1st Match Average Match Time 1st Match
    365.16 Average Opponent Rank 202.88
    61% (5888/9699) 1st Serve % 64% (93/145)
    66% (3913/5888) 1st Serve Win % 55% (51/93)
    45% (1715/3811) 2nd Serve Win % 31% (16/52)
    42% (387/925) Break Points Won % (Total) 55% (6/11)
    39% (3767/9585) Return Points Win % 38% (56/146)
    50% (120/240) Best of 3 Sets Win % 33% (5/15)
    100% (1/1) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
    38% (23/61) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 50% (2/4)
    52% (33/64) Deciding Set Win % 67% (2/3)
    86% (110/95) 1st Set Won, Won Match 88% (8/7)
    14% (110/15) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 13% (8/1)
    20% (132/27) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (9/0)

    Other Predictions

    San Miguel de Tucuman Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Abidjan 2 Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Abidjan 2 Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction
    • Loading news...