Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Klaartje Liebens vs Alicia Barnett Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Liebens vs Barnett analysis and find out who is favored!
Klaartje Liebens vs Alicia Barnett Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Liebens has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Barnett has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Liebens, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Barnett has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Liebens has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Barnett has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Liebens has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Barnett winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Liebens has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 59/ 34), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Barnett has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 87/ 77), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 26% (W/L 5/ 14).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Liebens winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Liebens winning 0 and Barnett winning 2. The last match between Liebens and Barnett was at the Roehampton, 28-09-2016, Second, Hard with Alicia Barnett getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Liebens and Barnett have played a deciding set 0 times, with Liebens winning 0 times and Barnett 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Liebens winning 0, and Barnett 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Liebens has played against opponents with an average rank of while Barnett has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Liebens has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Barnett has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Liebens has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Barnett has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Liebens 0 - 1 Barnett
Ret.
Rank
295
High
29
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
835
Rank
453
High
30
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
57% (158-120)
Career Total W/L
50% (146-146)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$5,242
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Klaartje Liebens | Alicia Barnett |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 5 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:0 | 1:23:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (43/60) | 73% (56/77) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (26/43) | 64% (36/56) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 29% (5/17) | 48% (10/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 11% (1/9) | 44% (4/9) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (31/77) | 48% (29/60) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Alicia Barnett
Player
Klaartje Liebens
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Klaartje Liebens | Alicia Barnett |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Klaartje Liebens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Katharina Hering
Player
Klaartje Liebens
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
7
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Klaartje Liebens
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lenka Jurikova
Player
Klaartje Liebens
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 2-6 3-3 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Theo Gravouil
Player
Klaartje Liebens
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chiara Grimm
Player
Klaartje Liebens
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
63)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Klaartje Liebens
Player
Josephine Boualem
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
7
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
54%
(
42 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diana Marcinkevica
Player
Klaartje Liebens
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Alicia Barnett Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Alicia Barnett
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilla Rosatello
Player
Alicia Barnett
49%
(
38 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
3
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
5
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nikol Rivkin
Player
Alicia Barnett
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisca Jorge
Player
Alicia Barnett
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andreea Mitu
Player
Alicia Barnett
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alicia Barnett
Player
Anna Siskova
50%
(
38 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
29%
(
11 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
49%
(
37 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Alicia Barnett
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 6-7(5) 10-7 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Alicia Barnett
52%
(
49 of
95)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
42 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alicia Barnett
Player
Amandine Monnot
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
9
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
35)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Liebens Vs Barnett Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
