B. Butulija
To Win
K. Kivattsev
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L W L W L LForm
L W L L L L W L L LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Kivattsev winning 2 and Visker winning 0. The last match between Kivattsev and Visker was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 19-02-2025, First, Hard with Kirill Kivattsev getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Kirill Kivattsev | 1 |
Niels Visker | 0 |
M15 Sharm ElSheikh(19-02-2025)
- / First
Miami Open - Miami atp
25 Mar 2025 / Fourth
Miami Open - Miami wta
24 Mar 2025 / Fourth
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Kirill Kivattsev
Player
Niels Visker
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve %
87%
(
13 of
15)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
9 of
14)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
10 of
13)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
43%
(
9 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
17
Total Points Won
19
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Predicting the Outcome of an Upcoming Tennis Match
In the realm of tennis prognostications, various insights can provide valuable leverage for those seeking to predict the outcome of an upcoming match. Delving into the realm of statistical analysis, we unearth a plethora of data that may hold the key to unlocking the secrets of success on the court.
Examining the performance of Kivattsev and Visker in recent form, a remarkable correlation arises between their second serve statistics and match prediction accuracy. Over the last six months, Kivattsev has triumphed in 50.52% of points played on their second serve, while Visker boasts a slightly higher success rate of 51.43%. The significance of this metric cannot be disregarded and warrants careful consideration.
An assessment of return game statistics further solidifies our predictions. Recent form indicates that Kivattsev has emerged victorious in 48.66% of their opponent's second serve points, with Visker trailing closely behind at 46.75%. The dynamics shift when evaluating first serve returns, as Kivattsev claims a success rate of 34.19% compared to Visker's 29.13%. These figures afford valuable insights into the players' strengths and weaknesses, greatly influencing our assessment of their performance in this highly anticipated head-to-head matchup.
Under pressure analysis is another crucial element in our quest for accurate predictions. Evaluating their recent form, Kivattsev has successfully saved 66.97% of breakpoints, while Visker has proven to be slightly more adept in this aspect with a save rate of 70.24%. This statistical revelation provides a valuable tool for in-game betting enthusiasts seeking to leverage the pressure factor and anticipate critical moments in the match.
Turning our attention to a holistic performance overview, the past year has witnessed Kivattsev securing victory in 56.72% of matches played, tallying an impressive win/loss record of 38/29. Meanwhile, Visker has displayed a commendable 58.9% success rate, claiming victory in 43 out of 73 matches. These figures lay the foundation for a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview as we prepare for the forthcoming clash.
Scrutinizing their aptitude across various surfaces intensifies the precision of our forecasts. Kivattsev boasts a commendable 75% career winning percentage on the grass, reflecting triumph in 3 out of 4 matches. Conversely, their performance on hard courts has proven to be more challenging, with a win rate of 53% out of a total of 90 matches. Comparatively, Visker's strengths align with hard courts, where they have registered a 68% career win rate, notching up victories in 51 out of 75 matches. On clay, Visker's performance dips slightly, but remains respectable at a 60% winning ratio across 131 encounters.
Understanding player levels further nourishes our understanding of the favorites in this forthcoming clash. Over the past year, Kivattsev predominantly competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, attaining a commendable success rate of 61.54% in their 52 matches played. In parallel, Visker demonstrated their prowess in the same tournament circuit, amassing a win percentage of 62.12% in their 66 matches played. To ascertain the favored contender, it is imperative to cross-reference these achievements with the event level at which they have been honing their skills.
Further insights into opponent quality elucidate the caliber of challenges they have encountered. Kivattsev has faced foes with an average rank of 467.43, signifying their ability to prevail against more formidable competition. On the other hand, Visker's adversaries, with an average rank of 380.4, have posed a slightly less daunting challenge. It is this contrasting spectrum of opponents that unveils the relative experiences and abilities of both players as they prepare for their confrontation.
Investigating the decisive set performance against all players over the past year, we uncover Kivattsev's impressive track record of triumphing in 67% of deciding sets. In contrast, Visker's success rate in such encounters stands at a lesser 36%. These stats become increasingly pertinent to those interested in live predictions and in-play betting, as they unveil the potential outcome in situations where the match reaches a climactic set.
Prior performance in the present event is a crucial aspect to consider alongside the historical data. While past player performance offers valuable insights into their abilities, it is equally vital to examine the current event statistics to gauge their current form and momentum. These statistics become all the more relevant when considering that certain players excel in specific events, a factor that often influences the final determination of the victor.
Break point conversion rates hold immense significance in the realm of in-game live betting tips. Kivattsev, in recent form, has converted 45.5% of their breakpoint opportunities, capitalizing on those pivotal moments to gain an advantage. Comparatively, Visker has amassed a respectable conversion percentage of 40.82%, showcasing their ability to seize pivotal moments when presented with the chance to break their opponents’ service.
For those yearning to explore the art of predicting tennis matches in a more intricate manner, an article presenting models that factor in both data and judgments serves as a valuable resource. However, be warned, for this material is only suitable for those passionate about the intricate intricacies of tennis statistics.
Note: To examine the current event stats, please refer to the section below.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Stuart Parker
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Yi Zhou
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 6-7(6) 10-8 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kirill Kivattsev
Player
Henrik Bladelius
47%
(
28 of
60)
1st Serve %
41%
(
16 of
39)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
5
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Filippo Moroni
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
20 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
18 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kirill Kivattsev
Player
Niels Visker
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve %
87%
(
13 of
15)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
9 of
14)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
10 of
13)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
43%
(
9 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
17
Total Points Won
19
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Erik Arutiunian
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
6 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
41
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Alexandr Binda
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Kirill Kivattsev
Player
Erik Arutiunian
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
66%
(
66 of
100)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
0
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
27 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
100)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kirill Kivattsev
Player
Filiberto Fumagalli
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
41 of
49)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
32 of
39)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
18 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Renta Tokuda
Player
Niels Visker
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Rio Noguchi
Player
Niels Visker
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Robert Strombachs
Player
Niels Visker
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Niels Visker
Player
Leonardo Cattaneo
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
78%
(
65 of
83)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
78%
(
14 of
18)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kirill Kivattsev
Player
Niels Visker
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve %
87%
(
13 of
15)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
9 of
14)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
10 of
13)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
43%
(
9 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
17
Total Points Won
19
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Niels Visker
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
89%
(
34 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
20%
(
12 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Toby Martin
Player
Niels Visker
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
3
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Finn Bass
Player
Niels Visker
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
2
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
4
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
46
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Niels Visker
Player
Tristan Lamasine
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
73%
(
54 of
74)
6
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
45 of
54)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
27 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
19 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Niels Visker
73%
(
76 of
104)
1st Serve %
59%
(
67 of
114)
8
Aces
23
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
63 of
76)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
54 of
67)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
27 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
33 of
114)
110
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more
View full predicted draw for Kivattsev