Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kimmi Hance vs Lisa Zaar Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hance vs Zaar analysis and find out who is favored!
Kimmi Hance vs Lisa Zaar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hance has won 47.37% of points on his second serve, while Zaar has won 42.02%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hance, in recent form, has won 52.59% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zaar has won 56.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.8% and 52.5% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hance has saved 59.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zaar has saved 52.48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hance has won 59.26% of matches played (W/L 16/ 11), with Zaar winning 50% (W/L 13/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hance has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 38/ 31), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 10/ 10). Zaar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 22/ 16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 20/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Hance has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.94% of matches (W/L 9/ 8), where as Zaar has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 5/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hance has played against opponents with an average rank of 115.7 while Zaar has played against players with an average rank of 207.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hance has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zaar has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hance has converted 72.41% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zaar has converted 58.82% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hance 0 - 0 Zaar
894
Rank
799
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
777
Rank
498
High
23
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
54% (49-42)
Career Total W/L
55% (48-40)
50% (1-1)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kimmi Hance | Lisa Zaar |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (17/13) | 45% (13/16) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 3 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.5 |
| DFs Total | 4 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (75/117) | 71% (65/91) |
| 1st Serve W% | 55% (41/75) | 48% (31/65) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (19/42) | 46% (12/26) |
| BPs Won% Total | 82% (9/11) | 54% (7/13) |
| Return Pts W% | 53% (51/96) | 46% (37/80) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Kimmi Hance Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Olivia Lincer
Player
Kimmi Hance
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
34 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Olivia Center
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve %
71%
(
17 of
24)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
10 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
36
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Catherine Harrison
Player
Kimmi Hance
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Mia Kupres
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Dalayna Hewitt
Player
Kimmi Hance
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Allura Zamarripa
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
2
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
10
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Haley Giavara
Player
Kimmi Hance
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Sabastiani Leon
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Filippa Bruu-Syversen
55%
(
42 of
76)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Lisa Zaar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Liv Hovde
Player
Lisa Zaar
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
91)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
7
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Asylzhan Arystanbekova
Player
Lisa Zaar
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
44%
(
17 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
48
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 2-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valerija Maija Kargina
Player
Lisa Zaar
60%
(
63 of
105)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
98)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
52 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
103
|
2-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Anastasia Mozgaleva
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
26 of
36)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Natalija Senic
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Valeriya Yushchenko
74%
(
64 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
1
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
27%
(
6 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
48%
(
41 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
46 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Tatyana Nikolenko
75%
(
84 of
112)
1st Serve %
76%
(
78 of
102)
-
Aces
-
9
Double Faults
3
55%
(
46 of
84)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
48%
(
54 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
55 of
102)
113
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Timea Jaruskova
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
3
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Iulia Andreea Ionescu
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
81%
(
42 of
52)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Lopatetskaya
Player
Lisa Zaar
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
54 of
70)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Hance Vs Zaar Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
