Kimmi Hance vs Janice Tjen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hance vs Tjen analysis and find out who is favored!
Kimmi Hance vs Janice Tjen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hance has won 44.64% of points on his second serve, while Tjen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hance, in recent form, has won 53.62% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tjen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.92% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hance has saved 58.89% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tjen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hance has won 59.26% of matches played (W/L 16/ 11), with Tjen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hance has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 38/ 31), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 10/ 10). Tjen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 8/ 7), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 8/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Hance has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.94% of matches (W/L 9/ 8), where as Tjen has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hance winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hance winning 2 and Tjen winning 0. The last match between Hance and Tjen was at the W15 Los Angeles, 30-06-2022, Second, Hard with Kimmi Hance getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:42:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hance and Tjen have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hance winning 0 times and Tjen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hance winning 0, and Tjen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hance has played against opponents with an average rank of 115.7 while Tjen has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hance has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tjen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hance has converted 50.62% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tjen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hance 1 - 0 Tjen
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
893
Rank
799
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
54% (49-42)
Career Total W/L
53% (8-7)
50% (1-1)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Kimmi Hance | Janice Tjen |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 14 | 10 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 8 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1:42:0 | 1:42:0 |
1st Serve % | 57% (46/80) | 69% (47/68) |
1st Serve Win% | 67% (31/46) | 51% (24/47) |
2nd Serve Win% | 38% (13/34) | 29% (6/21) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 78% (7/9) | 42% (5/12) |
Return Points W% | 56% (38/68) | 45% (36/80) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 7-5 |
Kimmi Hance
Player
Janice Tjen
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Kimmi Hance | Janice Tjen |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 57% (17/13) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.2 | 0 |
Aces Total | 3 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.27 | 0 |
DFs Total | 4 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 64% (75/117) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 55% (41/75) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 45% (19/42) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 82% (9/11) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 53% (51/96) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Kimmi Hance Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Olivia Lincer
Player
Kimmi Hance
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
34 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kimmi Hance
Player
Olivia Center
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve %
71%
(
17 of
24)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
10 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
36
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Catherine Harrison
Player
Kimmi Hance
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kimmi Hance
Player
Mia Kupres
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Dalayna Hewitt
Player
Kimmi Hance
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kimmi Hance
Player
Allura Zamarripa
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
2
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
10
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Haley Giavara
Player
Kimmi Hance
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kimmi Hance
Player
Sabastiani Leon
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kimmi Hance
Player
Filippa Bruu-Syversen
55%
(
42 of
76)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Janice Tjen Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Nao Hibino
Player
Janice Tjen
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Madison Brengle
Player
Janice Tjen
79%
(
56 of
71)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Janice Tjen
Player
Whitney Osuigwe
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
71 of
114)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
14
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
34%
(
15 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
43)
71%
(
10 of
14)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
50%
(
50 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
64 of
114)
115
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Janice Tjen
Player
Urszula Radwanska
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Janice Tjen
Player
Maegan Manasse
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve %
81%
(
25 of
31)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
60%
(
12 of
20)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
12 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
35
Total Points Won
27
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kimmi Hance
Player
Janice Tjen
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Janice Tjen
Player
Shatoo Mohamad
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | 4-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H |
view more