Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kimmi Hance vs Elizabeth Mandlik Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hance vs Mandlik analysis and find out who is favored!
Kimmi Hance vs Elizabeth Mandlik Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hance has won 47.37% of points on his second serve, while Mandlik has won 45.84%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hance, in recent form, has won 52.59% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mandlik has won 55.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.8% and 40.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hance has saved 59.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mandlik has saved 55.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hance has won 59.26% of matches played (W/L 16/ 11), with Mandlik winning 56.25% (W/L 36/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hance has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 38/ 31), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 10/ 10). Mandlik has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 6/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Hance has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.94% of matches (W/L 9/ 8), where as Mandlik has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.67% of matches (W/L 17/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hance winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hance winning 0 and Mandlik winning 2. The last match between Hance and Mandlik was at the W15 Carson, 08-03-2019, Second, Hard with Elizabeth Mandlik getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hance and Mandlik have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hance winning 0 times and Mandlik 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hance winning 0, and Mandlik 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hance has played against opponents with an average rank of 115.7 while Mandlik has played against players with an average rank of 189.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hance has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mandlik has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hance has converted 72.41% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mandlik has converted 54.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hance 0 - 1 Mandlik
894
Rank
799
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
124
Rank
97
High
22
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
54% (49-42)
Career Total W/L
57% (144-109)
50% (1-1)
YTD W/L
17% (1-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$296,900
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kimmi Hance | Elizabeth Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 7 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:0 | 1:29:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (37/63) | 64% (39/61) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (21/37) | 67% (26/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (11/26) | 59% (13/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 50% (4/8) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (22/61) | 49% (31/63) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Kimmi Hance
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kimmi Hance | Elizabeth Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (1/1) | 17% (1/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 27% (4/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (17/13) | 45% (66/80) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 3 | 4 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.48 |
| DFs Total | 4 | 34 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:50:8 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 165.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (75/117) | 54% (257/472) |
| 1st Serve W% | 55% (41/75) | 58% (150/257) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (19/42) | 41% (88/215) |
| BPs Won% Total | 82% (9/11) | 60% (28/47) |
| Return Pts W% | 53% (51/96) | 44% (205/461) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 17% (1/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 17% (6/1) |
Kimmi Hance Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Olivia Lincer
Player
Kimmi Hance
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
34 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Olivia Center
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve %
71%
(
17 of
24)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
10 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
36
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Catherine Harrison
Player
Kimmi Hance
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Mia Kupres
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Dalayna Hewitt
Player
Kimmi Hance
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Allura Zamarripa
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
2
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
10
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Haley Giavara
Player
Kimmi Hance
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Sabastiani Leon
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Filippa Bruu-Syversen
55%
(
42 of
76)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Elizabeth Mandlik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Katarina Zavatska
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Emeline Dartron
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Miroshnichenko
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
47%
(
51 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
62 of
124)
120
Total Points Won
113
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Usue Maitane Arconada
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
80)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
39 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
53%
(
48 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
5
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
7
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
31%
(
12 of
39)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Jamie Loeb
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Martina Capurro Taborda
55%
(
57 of
103)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
74)
61%
(
28 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martina Capurro Taborda
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
71%
(
72 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
47 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hance Vs Mandlik Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
