Kimmi Hance vs Andrea Gamiz Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W W W L L L
Form
L L L L L L L W L WHead-To-Head: Hance 1 - 0 Gamiz
They have played 3 sets in total, with Hance winning 2 and Gamiz winning 1. The last match between Hance and Gamiz was at the W40 Lisbon, 01-10-2023, Q1 round, Clay with Kimmi Hance getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kimmi Hance | 1 |
| Andrea Gamiz | 0 |
W40 Lisbon(01-10-2023)
4
6
6
3
6
0
| Hance | Stats | Gamiz |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 869 | Ranking | 855 |
| 799 | Highest Rank | 244 |
| 21 | Age | 32 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 13 |
| 54% (53-46) | Career Total W/L | 56% (439-338) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $16,320 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Korda VS Djokovic PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
27 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Pegula VS Eala PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
28 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Kimmi Hance
Player
Andrea Gamiz
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
75%
(
61 of
81)
6
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
1
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
97
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 9 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:2:0 | Average Match Time | 2:2:0 |
| 59% (57/96) | 1st Serve % | 75% (61/81) |
| 67% (38/57) | 1st Serve Win % | 43% (26/61) |
| 38% (15/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (11/20) |
| 50% (8/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 56% (5/9) |
| 54% (44/81) | Return Points Win % | 45% (43/96) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kimmi Hance Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kayla Day
Player
Kimmi Hance
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rachel Gailis
Player
Kimmi Hance
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Julieta Pareja
Player
Kimmi Hance
78%
(
83 of
107)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
8
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
7 of
33)
56%
(
10 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
49%
(
52 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
54 of
92)
109
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Anne Christine Lutkemeyer Obregon
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
59%
(
63 of
106)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
14
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
11 of
43)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
47%
(
43 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
58 of
106)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
5-7 6-0 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Basak Eraydin
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Thea Frodin
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
22 of
36)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Ema Burgic Bucko
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
76%
(
58 of
76)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
51%
(
26 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
44 of
76)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Haley Giavara
Player
Kimmi Hance
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
86
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Olivia Lincer
Player
Kimmi Hance
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
34 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Olivia Center
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve %
71%
(
17 of
24)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
10 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
36
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Andrea Gamiz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Andrea Gamiz
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Andrea Gamiz
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
75%
(
61 of
81)
6
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
1
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
97
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Andrea Gamiz
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
82%
(
75 of
91)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Andrea Knutson
Player
Andrea Gamiz
51%
(
36 of
71)
1st Serve %
86%
(
54 of
63)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Angelica Moratelli
Player
Andrea Gamiz
73%
(
71 of
97)
1st Serve %
80%
(
82 of
102)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
54 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sofya Lansere
Player
Andrea Gamiz
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (53/46) | Win/Loss | 56% (439/338) |
| 53% (121/106) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (985/789) |
| 51% (1047/1023) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (8448/7529) |
| 55% (42/34) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (63/63) |
| 50% (10/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (367/263) |
| 33% (1/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43% (9/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 68 | Aces Total | 149 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.09 |
| 343 | Total Double Faults | 713 |
| 1:15:50 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 455.86 | Average Opponent Rank | 575.84 |
| 61% (3003/4902) | 1st Serve % | 73% (20476/27974) |
| 59% (1769/3003) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (11492/20476) |
| 43% (815/1899) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3364/7498) |
| 52% (332/644) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1967/3834) |
| 48% (2339/4918) | Return Points Win % | 49% (13565/27923) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 42% (11/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 34% (13/25) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (23/30) | Challenger W/L | 53% (267/239) |
| 65% (30/16) | Futures W/L | 71% (148/59) |
| 53% (51/97) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (434/769) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 50% (6/12) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (82/157) |
| 45% (14/31) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (111/221) |
| 80% (56/45) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (446/375) |
| 20% (56/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (446/71) |
| 19% (43/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (331/62) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
