Kimmer Coppejans vs Tomas Martin Etcheverry Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Coppejans vs Etcheverry analysis and find out who is favored!
Kimmer Coppejans vs Tomas Martin Etcheverry Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Coppejans has won 46.53% of points on his second serve, while Etcheverry has won 52.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Coppejans, in recent form, has won 53.72% of his opponent's second serve points, while Etcheverry has won 51.15%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.24% and 25.76% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Coppejans has saved 60.61% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Etcheverry has saved 65% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Coppejans has won 52% of matches played (W/L 26/ 24), with Etcheverry winning 53.33% (W/L 32/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Coppejans has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 292/ 190), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9). Etcheverry has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 276/ 138), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Coppejans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 18/ 15), where as Etcheverry has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 51.72% of matches (W/L 15/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Coppejans winning 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Coppejans winning 3 and Etcheverry winning 3. The last match between Coppejans and Etcheverry was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 10-01-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Tomas Martin Etcheverry getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:15:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Coppejans and Etcheverry have played a deciding set 2 times, with Coppejans winning 1 times and Etcheverry 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Coppejans winning 0, and Etcheverry 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Coppejans has played against opponents with an average rank of 231.92 while Etcheverry has played against players with an average rank of 137.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Coppejans has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Etcheverry has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Coppejans has converted 25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Etcheverry has converted 34.72% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Coppejans 1 - 1 Etcheverry
12
Total
0
Mast
6
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
192
Rank
97
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
30
Rank
27
High
24
Age
R
Plays
8
Total
0
Mast
3
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
57% (418-314)
Career Total W/L
64% (318-181)
50% (2-2)
YTD W/L
42% (5-7)
$294,830
Career Prize Money
$1,637,750
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Coppejans VS Etcheverry H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Kimmer Coppejans | Tomas Martin Etcheverry |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
Games Won | 29 | 26 |
Aces (Total) | 9 | 14 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 2:15:30 | 2:15:30 |
1st Serve % | 69% (106/154) | 63% (114/181) |
1st Serve Win% | 73% (77/106) | 65% (74/114) |
2nd Serve Win% | 46% (22/48) | 52% (35/67) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (8/18) | 42% (5/12) |
Return Points W% | 40% (72/181) | 36% (55/154) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Coppejans VS Etcheverry H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2-6 6-4 6-1 |
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
11
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
6-7(7) 6-2 6-3 |
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
79%
(
66 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
100
Total Points Won
84
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Kimmer Coppejans | Tomas Martin Etcheverry |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (2/2) | 42% (5/7) |
Sets Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 52% (15/14) |
Games Win/Loss | 48% (45/48) | 52% (156/143) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 33% (2/4) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.37 | 0.46 |
Aces Total | 17 | 68 |
DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.09 |
DFs Total | 10 | 13 |
Avg Match Time | 1:54:12 | 2:16:55 |
Avg Opp Rank | 250.5 | 128.92 |
1st Serve % | 61% (174/286) | 68% (661/965) |
1st Serve W% | 72% (125/174) | 70% (462/661) |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (54/112) | 50% (152/304) |
BPs Won% Total | 23% (8/35) | 37% (33/90) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (119/327) | 36% (337/932) |
Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 67% (2/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 38% (3/8) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 20% (1/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/3) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 71% (7/5) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 14% (7/1) |
1st set L, W | 50% (4/2) | 0% (5/0) |
Kimmer Coppejans Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
55%
(
65 of
119)
1st Serve %
68%
(
89 of
131)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
61 of
89)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
42 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
52 of
131)
129
Total Points Won
121
|
6-7(1) 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
80%
(
36 of
45)
10
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Lucas Poullain
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Liam Draxl
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jose Statham
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
50%
(
18 of
36)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
17 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
39
Total Points Won
37
|
4-6 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
6
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
12
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
96%
(
25 of
26)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
14 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Rubber 1 |
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
119)
10
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
59 of
80)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
41 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
119)
115
Total Points Won
119
|
7-6(8) 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
Titouan Droguet
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
14
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 1-6 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Tomas Martin Etcheverry Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Andy Murray
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
24%
(
16 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
49%
(
18 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Federico Coria
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
77%
(
59 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Rubber 2 |
Timofey Skatov
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Novak Djokovic
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
72%
(
72 of
100)
10
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
51 of
72)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
19 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
104
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Gael Monfils
78%
(
80 of
102)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
5
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
44 of
53)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
35 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Andy Murray
71%
(
57 of
80)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
82)
11
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
95
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more