Prediction of Kimmer Coppejans [286th] vs Pablo Llamas Ruiz [611th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W W L W L
Form
L W L W L L W W L LHead-To-Head: Coppejans 1 - 0 Ruiz
They have played 2 sets in total, with Coppejans winning 2 and Ruiz winning 0. The last match between Coppejans and Ruiz was at the Murcia Challenger, 21-03-2025, Quarterfinals, Clay with Kimmer Coppejans getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kimmer Coppejans | 1 |
| Pablo Llamas Ruiz | 0 |
| Coppejans | Stats | Ruiz |
|---|---|---|
| 69% (20-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 40% (4-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 286 | Ranking | 611 |
| 97 | Highest Rank | 131 |
| 31 | Age | 22 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 16 | Titles | 4 |
| 59% (465-329) | Career Total W/L | 60% (153-101) |
| $294,830 | Career Prize Money | $129,940 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:28:38 | Average Match Time | 1:28:38 |
| 51% (29/57) | 1st Serve % | 67% (45/67) |
| 72% (21/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (26/45) |
| 61% (17/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (11/22) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (1/5) |
| 45% (30/67) | Return Points Win % | 33% (19/57) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kimmer Coppejans vs Pablo Llamas Ruiz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Coppejans 1 - 0 Ruiz
Editorial Prediction:
In analyzing key performance statistics ahead of the upcoming tennis match, the comparison between Kimmer Coppejans and Roberto Ruiz becomes pronounced. Coppejans has demonstrated notable prowess with an impressive match win rate of 77.78% over the past year, translating to a 42-12 win-loss record. In contrast, Ruiz's performance metrics reveal a comparatively modest win rate of 52.17%, represented by a 12-11 win-loss statistic. This disparity in overall match outcomes highlights Coppejans as a formidable competitor in this matchup.
A detailed examination of second serve stats in recent form over six months showcases negligible differentiation between the players; Coppejans winning 42.1% while Ruiz edges slightly ahead with 42.21% of their second serve points. Conversely, Coppejans holds an advantage in return game dynamics, particularly in securing 47.1% of his opponent's second serve points, eclipsing Ruiz's 38.61%. Furthermore, the returns on first serves highlight Ruiz's proficiency at 33.52% compared to Coppejans’ 27.44%, offering a nuanced layer to their competitive analysis.
Pressure situations further tip the scales in Coppejans' favor; he has convincingly managed to win 68% of deciding sets over the past year, suggesting resilience and composure under high-stakes conditions, compared to Ruiz's 38% win rate in similar circumstances. Both players possess differentiated success across surfaces, with Coppejans excelling on hard courts, achieving a win percentage of 62%, whereas Ruiz prevails on clay, boasting a 65% success rate there. Additionally, pressure stats reflect Ruiz's aptitude, saving 54.55% of breakpoints compared to Coppejans' 50.99%.
Break point conversion rates further depict Coppejans superior form, capitalizing on 41.03% of opportunities to serve breaks, sharply outperforming Ruiz’s 25%. Such stats inform live betting strategy as they often hold the key to crucial match moments. It's also prudent to acknowledge each player’s typical competition level; Coppejans has dominated in the Futures/Satellites sphere, winning 92% of matches, while Ruiz navigates frequently among more competitive Challengers/ITF circuits, reflecting on win consistency but against tougher opponents.
Conclusively, while both players exhibit strengths in different facets of the game, the accumulated statistical edge leans towards Coppejans as the more likely victor given his dominant track record, especially in high-pressure and deciding situations. Understanding that Ruiz typically competes against higher-ranked opponents with an average rank of 210.3 compared to Coppejans' 369.31 might provide context but does not overshadow the tangible advantage Coppejans holds in key performance metrics.
Kimmer Coppejans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
88)
81
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(5) 0-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Radu Albot
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Rincon
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
56%
(
67 of
120)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
101)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
53%
(
28 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
44 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Ryan Nijboer
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Izan Corretja
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve %
44%
(
16 of
36)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
70%
(
69 of
99)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
100
Total Points Won
100
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Elmer Moller
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Sebastian Ofner
43%
(
40 of
92)
1st Serve %
52%
(
63 of
122)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
60%
(
31 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
16 of
59)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
61 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
95
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
6
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
49%
(
33 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
75
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 7-5 11-9 | H2H | ||
view more
Pablo Llamas Ruiz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
85%
(
33 of
39)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
16 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
41
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Daniel Rincon
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Sumit Nagal
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
80%
(
41 of
51)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Steven Diez
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
43%
(
21 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
57
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
74%
(
60 of
81)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Andres Andrade
76%
(
68 of
90)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Daniel Batista
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
73%
(
62 of
85)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
47 of
65)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
100)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Coppejans vs Ruiz?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Coppejans Vs Ruiz is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (465/329) | Win/Loss | 60% (153/101) |
| 56% (1057/835) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (341/235) |
| 53% (9326/8393) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2919/2541) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 2126 | Aces Total | 423 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 1792 | Total Double Faults | 301 |
| 1:28:38 | Average Match Time | 1:34:12 |
| 493.53 | Average Opponent Rank | 363.25 |
| 65% (31119/48203) | 1st Serve % | 68% (11212/16467) |
| 67% (20891/31119) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (7225/11212) |
| 49% (8295/17084) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2647/5255) |
| 43% (2339/5378) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (831/1829) |
| 42% (20668/49329) | Return Points Win % | 42% (6914/16302) |
| 59% (459/781) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (150/246) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 55% (117/212) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (39/76) |
| 57% (167/294) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (35/72) |
| 84% (433/363) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (156/137) |
| 16% (433/69) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (156/19) |
| 28% (361/101) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (98/15) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
