Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kimmer Coppejans vs Matteo Gigante Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Coppejans vs Gigante analysis and find out who is favored!
Kimmer Coppejans vs Matteo Gigante Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Coppejans has won 46.53% of points on his second serve, while Gigante has won 49.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Coppejans, in recent form, has won 53.72% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gigante has won 51.09%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.24% and 35.38% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Coppejans has saved 60.61% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gigante has saved 58.85% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Coppejans has won 52.27% of matches played (W/L 23/ 21), with Gigante winning 61.54% (W/L 40/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Coppejans has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 292/ 190), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9). Gigante has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 77% (W/L 40/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 26% (W/L 7/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Coppejans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 15/ 12), where as Gigante has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.31% of matches (W/L 35/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Coppejans winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Coppejans winning 2 and Gigante winning 1. The last match between Coppejans and Gigante was at the Parma Challenger, 03-11-2020, First, I.hard with Kimmer Coppejans getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:45:14.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Coppejans and Gigante have played a deciding set 1 times, with Coppejans winning 1 times and Gigante 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Coppejans winning 0, and Gigante 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Coppejans has played against opponents with an average rank of 237.68 while Gigante has played against players with an average rank of 295.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Coppejans has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gigante has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Coppejans has converted 25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gigante has converted 47% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Coppejans 1 - 0 Gigante
232
Rank
97
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
141
Rank
141
High
22
Age
L
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
57% (418-314)
Career Total W/L
60% (123-83)
50% (2-2)
YTD W/L
76% (22-7)
$294,830
Career Prize Money
$40,215
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kimmer Coppejans | Matteo Gigante |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:14 | 1:45:14 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (57/84) | 64% (54/85) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (46/57) | 72% (39/54) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (12/27) | 48% (15/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (31/85) | 31% (26/84) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Matteo Gigante
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kimmer Coppejans | Matteo Gigante |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (2/2) | 76% (22/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 65% (45/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (45/48) | 55% (350/281) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 86% (18/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.37 | 0.43 |
| Aces Total | 17 | 133 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.46 |
| DFs Total | 10 | 141 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:12 | 1:35:18 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 250.5 | 252.28 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (174/286) | 62% (1227/1989) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (125/174) | 70% (863/1227) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (54/112) | 51% (386/762) |
| BPs Won% Total | 23% (8/35) | 47% (101/214) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (119/327) | 42% (838/1997) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 87% (20/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 76% (22/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 64% (7/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (2/2) | 91% (10/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 94% (17/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 6% (17/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (4/2) | 50% (12/6) |
Kimmer Coppejans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
55%
(
65 of
119)
1st Serve %
68%
(
89 of
131)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
61 of
89)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
42 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
52 of
131)
129
Total Points Won
121
|
6-7(1) 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
80%
(
36 of
45)
10
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Lucas Poullain
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
50%
(
18 of
36)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
17 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
39
Total Points Won
37
|
4-6 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
6
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
12
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
96%
(
25 of
26)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
14 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
119)
10
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
59 of
80)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
41 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
119)
115
Total Points Won
119
|
7-6(8) 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
14
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Matteo Gigante Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Matteo Gigante
56%
(
14 of
25)
1st Serve %
47%
(
18 of
38)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
5 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
41
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Rudolf Molleker
75%
(
77 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
49 of
65)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
29 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(5) 0-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Karim Bennani
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
4
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
5
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Matteo Gigante
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
58%
(
53 of
92)
1st Serve %
45%
(
41 of
91)
2
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
7
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Matteo Gigante
52%
(
13 of
25)
1st Serve %
79%
(
27 of
34)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
38
Total Points Won
21
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Bu Yunchaokete
66%
(
77 of
116)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
108)
7
Aces
10
11
Double Faults
3
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
44%
(
51 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
114
|
1-6 7-6(0) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Mitchell Krueger
53%
(
65 of
122)
1st Serve %
75%
(
79 of
105)
6
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
0
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
54%
(
31 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
46 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
105)
114
Total Points Won
113
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Coppejans Vs Gigante Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
