Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kimmer Coppejans vs Mackenzie McDonald Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Coppejans vs McDonald analysis and find out who is favored!
Kimmer Coppejans vs Mackenzie McDonald Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Coppejans has won 46.53% of points on his second serve, while McDonald has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Coppejans, in recent form, has won 53.72% of his opponent's second serve points, while McDonald has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.24% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Coppejans has saved 60.61% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas McDonald has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Coppejans has won 51.16% of matches played (W/L 22/ 21), with McDonald winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Coppejans has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 292/ 190), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9). McDonald has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Coppejans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 14/ 12), where as McDonald has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Coppejans has played against opponents with an average rank of 243.21 while McDonald has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Coppejans has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while McDonald has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Coppejans has converted 25% of breakpoint opportunities, and McDonald has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Coppejans 0 - 0 McDonald
N/A
Rank
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kimmer Coppejans | Mackenzie McDonald |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (2/2) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (45/48) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.37 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 17 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 10 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:12 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 250.5 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (174/286) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (125/174) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (54/112) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 23% (8/35) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (119/327) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (2/2) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (4/2) | 1st Match |
Kimmer Coppejans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats 
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
55%
(
65 of
119)
1st Serve %
68%
(
89 of
131)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
61 of
89)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
42 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
52 of
131)
129
Total Points Won
121
|
6-7(1) 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
80%
(
36 of
45)
10
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Lucas Poullain
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
50%
(
18 of
36)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
17 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
39
Total Points Won
37
|
4-6 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
6
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
12
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
96%
(
25 of
26)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
14 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
119)
10
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
59 of
80)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
41 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
119)
115
Total Points Won
119
|
7-6(8) 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
14
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Mackenzie McDonald Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
58%
(
83 of
143)
1st Serve %
67%
(
78 of
117)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
52 of
78)
50%
(
30 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
39%
(
56 of
143)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
45 of
117)
132
Total Points Won
128
|
6-3 1-6 3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
41 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
19 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
98
Total Points Won
75
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Jeff Wolf
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
46%
(
43 of
94)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
35 of
43)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
94)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
5 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Max Purcell
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
4
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
91)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
0
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
47 of
65)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Corentin Moutet
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
80%
(
41 of
51)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Coppejans Vs McDonald Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
