B. Z. Miralles
To Win
I. Radulov
To Win
Kilian Feldbausch vs Bernabe Zapata Miralles Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W L W L
Form
L W W L W W L W W WHead-2-Head: Feldbausch 1 - 0 Miralles
They have played 2 sets in total, with Feldbausch winning 2 and Miralles winning 0. The last match between Feldbausch and Miralles was at the Menorca Challenger, 31-03-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Kilian Feldbausch getting the victory 6-4 3-0 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kilian Feldbausch | 1 |
| Bernabe Zapata Miralles | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Menorca Challenger(31-03-2025)
Kilian Feldbausch
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
6
4
3
0
| Feldbausch | Stats | Miralles |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (21-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 57% (20-15) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 489 | Ranking | 332 |
| 409 | Highest Rank | 37 |
| 19 | Age | 28 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 2 | Titles | 12 |
| 57% (71-53) | Career Total W/L | 57% (431-328) |
| $3,200 | Career Prize Money | $1,252,255 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
- / Semifinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fearnley VS Wawrinka PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Rinderknech PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Feldbausch VS Miralles H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-0 ret. |
Stats 
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve %
78%
(
43 of
55)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
50%
(
16 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
49
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
Feldbausch VS Miralles H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 9 | Games Won | 4 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:57:24 | Average Match Time | 0:57:24 |
| 84% (27/32) | 1st Serve % | 78% (43/55) |
| 56% (15/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 42% (18/43) |
| 20% (1/5) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (4/12) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 60% (33/55) | Return Points Win % | 50% (16/32) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Feldbausch vs Miralles Match Preview :
When it comes to second serve performance, who's showing the more promising form over the last six months? Miralles edges ahead, winning 42.27% of points on their second serve, just surpassing Feldbausch's 40.27%. This statistic might seem marginal, yet it plays a crucial role in the accurate prediction of match outcomes.
Shifting focus to return game statistics, how do these players fare? Miralles has been successful in clinching 51.1% of points on their opponent's second serve, whereas Feldbausch holds at 46.19%. However, Feldbausch takes the lead when facing the first serve, winning 32.7% compared to Miralles's 29.48%. The ability to return serves effectively has a strong connection to prevailing in head-to-head matchups.
Let's delve into handling pressure during breakpoints: Miralles stands resilient, saving 47.37% of breakpoints faced. Feldbausch trails slightly, with a 44.25% success rate in similar situations. This stat provides valuable insights for those keen on in-game betting strategies, indicating Miralles's tenacity in tougher moments.
In a broader stroke, considering their performances across the past year, Miralles has managed to win 46.3% of matches (W/L 25/29). In contrast, Feldbausch has a higher winning percentage at 61.36% (W/L 27/17). It gives a comprehensive prediction overview for head-to-head confrontations.
What about their preferred surfaces? Both players exhibit their best career surface win percentages on clay. Miralles boasts a 62% win rate (W/L 300/182), paralleling Feldbausch’s solid 59% (W/L 48/34). On the flip side, indoor hard courts aren't their forte, as indicated by their respective win rates of 42% and 50%.
Examining the events they've competed in, Miralles and Feldbausch have both been primarily active in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K. Miralles won 46.51% of these encounters (W/L 20/23), while Feldbausch claimed victories in exactly half (W/L 11/11).
Considering their opponents' caliber, Miralles has tackled a higher average opponent rank of 254.7, contrasting with Feldbausch's 423.41. It's a factor that can't be overlooked when contemplating player strengths.
In deciding set scenarios over the last year, both players share equal footing, each claiming 44% of such matches. This underlying stat can intrigue those eyeing live predictions and betting.
While historical data is insightful, current tournament performance can be equally revealing. Players often have favorites where they excel, which also influences match predictions. Not to be underestimated is their breakpoint conversion competence. Recently, Miralles converted 36.67% of opportunities, marginally less than Feldbausch’s 38.42%, providing a window into potential in-game dynamics.
Taking a holistic view of these statistics, Feldbausch appears slightly favored based on a higher overall win rate and stronger first serve return percentage, though Miralles’s experience and surface prowess can never be counted out. It promises a tightly contested clash, but the edge lies with Feldbausch to seize victory.
Feldbausch vs Miralles Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Kilian Feldbausch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Kilian Feldbausch
64%
(
69 of
107)
1st Serve %
70%
(
56 of
80)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
47 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Kilian Feldbausch
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Michael Vrbensky
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
David Jorda Sanchis
Player
Kilian Feldbausch
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
John Sperle
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve %
71%
(
30 of
42)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Manvydas Balciunas
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
51%
(
43 of
84)
0
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
2
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
47%
(
44 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
47 of
84)
97
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Jonas Forejtek
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Bernabe Zapata Miralles Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
John Sperle
73%
(
79 of
108)
1st Serve %
64%
(
75 of
117)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
75)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
45%
(
49 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
53 of
117)
112
Total Points Won
113
|
1-6 7-6(5) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Tomas Curras Abasolo
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
79%
(
30 of
38)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
53%
(
23 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
42
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Ian Luca Cervantes Tomas
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
78%
(
39 of
50)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Daniel Evans
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
50%
(
19 of
38)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Arthur Gea
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve %
56%
(
19 of
34)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
57%
(
8 of
14)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
29
Total Points Won
22
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aleksandar Vukic
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
83%
(
35 of
42)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Jesper De Jong
74%
(
59 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (71/53) | Win/Loss | 57% (431/328) |
| 56% (162/126) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (966/782) |
| 53% (1421/1248) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8362/7664) |
| 56% (5/4) | Hard Win/Loss | 49% (69/72) |
| 59% (57/40) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (312/188) |
| 50% (9/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42% (42/59) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 47% (8/9) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 153 | Aces Total | 1154 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 407 | Total Double Faults | 1240 |
| 1:41:38 | Average Match Time | 1:16:57 |
| 246.18 | Average Opponent Rank | 436.23 |
| 71% (5906/8348) | 1st Serve % | 66% (28935/43672) |
| 62% (3649/5906) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (18373/28935) |
| 47% (1141/2442) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (7222/14733) |
| 47% (500/1063) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (2176/4683) |
| 46% (3895/8524) | Return Points Win % | 42% (17748/42279) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 54% (21/18) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 28% (7/18) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 20% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 46% (50/58) |
| 54% (29/25) | Challenger W/L | 55% (162/134) |
| 63% (41/24) | Futures W/L | 66% (190/99) |
| 56% (65/117) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (414/721) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 45% (10/22) |
| 38% (10/26) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (87/180) |
| 44% (17/39) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (116/214) |
| 83% (71/59) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (429/376) |
| 15% (71/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (429/53) |
| 21% (53/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (330/55) |
Feldbausch vs. Miralles Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
