Kenny de Schepper vs Cyril Vandermeersch Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W W W W L LHead To Head: Schepper 2 - 0 Vandermeersch
They have played 5 sets in total, with Schepper winning 4 and Vandermeersch winning 1. The last match between Schepper and Vandermeersch was at the M15 Lons-le-Saunier, 02-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: I.hard, with Kenny de Schepper getting the victory 7-6(1) 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kenny de Schepper | 2 |
| Cyril Vandermeersch | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M15 Lons-le-Saunier(02-04-2025)
Kenny de Schepper
Cyril Vandermeersch
7
6
7
6
| Schepper | Stats | Vandermeersch |
|---|---|---|
| 48% (13-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 66% (25-13) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 627 | Ranking | 743 |
| 62 | Highest Rank | 670 |
| 37 | Age | 26 |
| L | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 53% (535-468) | Career Total W/L | 59% (125-88) |
| $620,970 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Yastremska VS Aiava PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kasatkina VS Siniakova PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Schepper VS Vandermeersch H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
49 of
59)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
| 4-6 6-2 7-5 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
10
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
20 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
Schepper VS Vandermeersch H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 31 | Games Won | 25 |
| 18 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:4:10 | Average Match Time | 2:4:10 |
| 67% (110/164) | 1st Serve % | 61% (97/158) |
| 82% (90/110) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (67/97) |
| 48% (26/54) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (36/61) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 35% (55/158) | Return Points Win % | 29% (48/164) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Schepper vs Vandermeersch Match Preview :
In the arena of second serve performance over the past six months, Schepper has a slight edge, winning 47.72% of points compared to Vandermeersch's 43.04%. This subtle difference may play a significant role in the trajectory of the match. The return game statistics further enhance the player comparison, revealing that Vandermeersch has claimed 49.73% of second serve return points, while Schepper has secured 44.97%. A similar trend is observed in first serve returns, with Schepper leading at 28.89% over Vandermeersch’s 25.09%. These figures are crucial in forecasting the favored player in this matchup.
Analyzing under-pressure scenarios adds another layer to the predictive analysis. Vandermeersch has successfully saved 53.1% of breakpoints, slightly less impressive compared to Schepper's 56.87%. This statistic provides a valuable reference for in-game betting decisions. Looking at the performance over the past year, Vandermeersch boasts a commendable winning rate of 65.12% from matches, with a record of 28 wins against 15 losses, whereas Schepper has not won any matches recently, offering a broad perspective on the head-to-head prediction.
When examining their surface preferences, Vandermeersch appears most comfortable on hard courts, with a 61% win rate, and less so on clay. The absence of specific performance data for Schepper's surface preferences leaves room for speculation. At the player level, Vandermeersch has participated mostly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, winning 64.1% (25 wins and 14 losses), while the data for Schepper is undisclosed. Contextualizing these statistics according to the level of tournaments, it becomes apparent that playing experience could influence their upcoming performance.
In terms of direct head-to-head encounters, Schepper holds a narrow advantage, having won one contest against Vandermeersch and leading in most categories such as sets played and winning the decisive third set. Their last meeting at the M 15 Bressuire was intensely competitive, with Schepper emerging victorious in a three-set clash. Historical head-to-head match durations average around two hours, suggesting a competitive battle when these two collide.
Deciding sets performance adds a dynamic for those interested in live predictions, as Vandermeersch excels in such situations with a 73% success rate, starkly contrasting Schepper's limited exposure. Neither player has won any tiebreaks in their encounters, emphasizing their competitive parity. Vandermeersch has consistently faced higher-ranked opponents over the past year, averaging a rank of 363.4, although the details for Schepper remain unspecified.
For those keen on live betting, the breakpoint conversion data offers further insight, with Vandermeersch executing 33.52% successfully compared to Schepper’s slightly lower rate of 32.73%. Considering these comprehensive statistics and recent performances, Vandermeersch emerges as the predicted favorite to win, leveraging his higher win percentage, consistent play under pressure, and superior second serve return capability despite Schepper's historical advantage in their direct clashes.
Schepper vs Vandermeersch Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Kenny de Schepper Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Kenny de Schepper
57%
(
54 of
94)
1st Serve %
66%
(
78 of
118)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
53 of
78)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
52 of
118)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Mario Gonzalez Fernandez
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
17%
(
3 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
48
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henrique Rocha
Player
Kenny de Schepper
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
76%
(
48 of
63)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Dino Molokova Ferreira
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Cyril Vandermeersch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Igor Ribeiro Marcondes
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Filippo Moroni
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
89)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Aziz Ouakaa
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
84
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Igor Ribeiro Marcondes
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Alberto Barroso Campos
50%
(
12 of
24)
1st Serve %
71%
(
17 of
24)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
9 of
12)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
7 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
31
Total Points Won
17
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
44%
(
17 of
39)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
49
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-1 1-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (535/468) | Win/Loss | 59% (125/88) |
| 0% (0/0) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (276/214) |
| 0% (0/0) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2503/2245) |
| 56% (116/93) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (91/57) |
| 47% (148/165) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 56% (236/184) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (34/30) |
| 57% (35/26) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 513 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 662 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:27:14 |
| 0 | Average Opponent Rank | 443.17 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 56% (6686/11895) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (4582/6686) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2589/5209) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (547/1221) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 41% (4828/11647) |
| 46% (25/29) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 32% (6/13) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (83/83) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (242/221) | Challenger W/L | 36% (4/7) |
| 60% (179/119) | Futures W/L | 60% (121/81) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (123/211) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (21/50) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (38/66) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (119/106) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (119/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (94/18) |
Schepper vs. Vandermeersch Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
