Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kenneth Raisma vs Temur Ismailov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Raisma vs Ismailov analysis and find out who is favored!
Kenneth Raisma vs Temur Ismailov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Raisma has won 44.44% of points on his second serve, while Ismailov has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Raisma, in recent form, has won 50% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ismailov has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.51% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Raisma has saved 62.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ismailov has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Raisma has won 70% of matches played (W/L 7/ 3), with Ismailov winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Raisma has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 37/ 21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 30/ 23). Ismailov has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 16/ 14), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Raisma has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70% of matches (W/L 7/ 3), where as Ismailov has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Raisma winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Raisma winning 2 and Ismailov winning 0. The last match between Raisma and Ismailov was at the Estonia F4, 09-11-2016, Second, I.hard with Kenneth Raisma getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:18:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Raisma and Ismailov have played a deciding set 0 times, with Raisma winning 0 times and Ismailov 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Raisma winning 0, and Ismailov 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Raisma has played against opponents with an average rank of 184.3 while Ismailov has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Raisma has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ismailov has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Raisma has converted 35.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ismailov has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Raisma 1 - 0 Ismailov
830
Rank
676
High
26
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
397
High
29
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
61% (126-79)
Career Total W/L
49% (136-142)
67% (4-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kenneth Raisma | Temur Ismailov |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:18:0 | 1:18:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (33/59) | 73% (35/48) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (26/33) | 60% (21/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (15/26) | 54% (7/13) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/6) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (20/48) | 31% (18/59) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Kenneth Raisma
Player
Temur Ismailov
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
6
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kenneth Raisma | Temur Ismailov |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (67/58) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 7 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 9 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 222.67 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (87/141) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (59/87) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (24/54) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 36% (5/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (64/163) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Kenneth Raisma Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Imanol Lopez Morillo
Player
Kenneth Raisma
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kenneth Raisma
Player
Luca Giacomini
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
99)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Kenneth Raisma
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
9
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kenneth Raisma
Player
Nikolaos Chatziavraam
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 1-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
view more
Temur Ismailov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Temur Ismailov
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
21 of
34)
6
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
8
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
82%
(
28 of
34)
55
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Borisiouk
Player
Temur Ismailov
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
44%
(
32 of
73)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristian Lozan
Player
Temur Ismailov
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
2
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Temur Ismailov
Player
Dostanbek Tashbulatov
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Temur Ismailov
Player
Anton Chekhov
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
7
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 6-7(3) 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Temur Ismailov
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Markos Kalovelonis
Player
Temur Ismailov
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Rybakov
Player
Temur Ismailov
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Temur Ismailov
56%
(
10 of
18)
1st Serve %
54%
(
14 of
26)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
9 of
10)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
2 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
34
Total Points Won
10
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Pre-Q | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Raisma Vs Ismailov Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
