Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ken Onishi vs Kristjan Tamm Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Onishi vs Tamm analysis and find out who is favored!
Ken Onishi vs Kristjan Tamm Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Onishi has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Tamm has won 45.26%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Onishi, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tamm has won 47.32%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Onishi has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tamm has saved 68.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Onishi has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Tamm winning 50% (W/L 14/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Onishi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 74/ 71), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6). Tamm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 94/ 70), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 37% (W/L 11/ 19).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Onishi winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Onishi winning 2 and Tamm winning 1. The last match between Onishi and Tamm was at the Hungary F4 (Gyula), 11-06-2018, Q3, Clay with Ken Onishi getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Onishi and Tamm have played a deciding set 1 times, with Onishi winning 1 times and Tamm 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Onishi winning 0, and Tamm 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Onishi has played against opponents with an average rank of while Tamm has played against players with an average rank of 153.14.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Onishi has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tamm has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Onishi has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tamm has converted 38.24% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Onishi 1 - 0 Tamm
Ret.
Rank
684
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
827
Rank
625
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
49% (109-113)
Career Total W/L
52% (164-154)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (8-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ken Onishi | Kristjan Tamm |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:21:0 | 2:21:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (64/90) | 55% (43/78) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (39/64) | 60% (26/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (15/26) | 54% (19/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (33/78) | 40% (36/90) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 2-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Ken Onishi
Player
Kristjan Tamm
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ken Onishi | Kristjan Tamm |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (8/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (19/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (179/181) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (8/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.57 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 99 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 54 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:52:18 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 206.69 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 61% (737/1201) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (524/737) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (210/464) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 38% (39/102) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 37% (429/1146) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (8/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 53% (8/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 13% (8/1) |
Ken Onishi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-2 12-10 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Aristotelis Thanos
Player
Ken Onishi
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
32 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ken Onishi
Player
Yurii Dzhavakian
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 3-6 18-16 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Kristjan Tamm Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Kristjan Tamm
59%
(
66 of
111)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
104)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
73)
64%
(
29 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
35%
(
39 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Corban Crowther
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Egor Agafonov
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Kristjan Tamm
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Filip Peliwo
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
7
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
0
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
29%
(
10 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
39 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Ye Hongyu
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tauheed Browning
Player
Kristjan Tamm
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mees Rottgering
Player
Kristjan Tamm
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve %
64%
(
9 of
14)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
14
Total Points Won
4
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Illya Beloborodko
58%
(
64 of
111)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
2
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
6
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
51%
(
24 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
41 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Milan Drinic
56%
(
76 of
136)
1st Serve %
69%
(
100 of
144)
24
Aces
8
8
Double Faults
3
80%
(
61 of
76)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
67 of
100)
38%
(
23 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
38%
(
52 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
60 of
144)
144
Total Points Won
136
|
7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Onishi Vs Tamm Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
