Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Katie Swan vs Mirjam Bjorklund Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Swan vs Bjorklund analysis and find out who is favored!
Katie Swan vs Mirjam Bjorklund Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Swan has won 40.66% of points on his second serve, while Bjorklund has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Swan, in recent form, has won 56.66% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bjorklund has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.57% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Swan has saved 57.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bjorklund has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Swan has won 50% of matches played (W/L 17/ 17), with Bjorklund winning 59.09% (W/L 13/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Swan has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 20/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 14/ 21). Bjorklund has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 16/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Swan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.84% of matches (W/L 17/ 14), where as Bjorklund has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72.73% of matches (W/L 8/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Swan winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Swan winning 0 and Bjorklund winning 2. The last match between Swan and Bjorklund was at the W100 Bonita Springs, 11-05-2021, Q3, Clay with Mirjam Bjorklund getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:49:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Swan and Bjorklund have played a deciding set 0 times, with Swan winning 0 times and Bjorklund 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Swan winning 0, and Bjorklund 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Swan has played against opponents with an average rank of 281.18 while Bjorklund has played against players with an average rank of 178.27.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Swan has won 22% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bjorklund has won 22% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Swan has converted 45.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bjorklund has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Swan 0 - 1 Bjorklund
333
Rank
118
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
282
Rank
123
High
25
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
60% (201-132)
Career Total W/L
61% (212-134)
44% (4-5)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$221,866
Career Prize Money
$378,603
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Katie Swan | Mirjam Bjorklund |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 6 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:0 | 1:49:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (37/57) | 70% (42/60) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 54% (20/37) | 57% (24/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 35% (7/20) | 67% (12/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 22% (2/9) | 63% (5/8) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (24/60) | 53% (30/57) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Katie Swan
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Katie Swan | Mirjam Bjorklund |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (10/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (89/90) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 19 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.46 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 40 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:26 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 176.22 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (326/534) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (215/326) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 39% (81/208) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (36/85) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (293/630) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Katie Swan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Melisa Ercan
Player
Katie Swan
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
42%
(
18 of
43)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
14 of
18)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aoi Ito
Player
Katie Swan
81%
(
72 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katie Swan
Player
Melisa Ercan
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Swan
Player
Xiaodi You
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Hule
Player
Katie Swan
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
68%
(
64 of
94)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Katie Swan
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
87
Total Points Won
63
|
5-7 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katie Swan
Player
Yeon Woo Ku
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
74%
(
59 of
80)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
72
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Swan
Player
Fernanda Contreras Gomez
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Margaux Rouvroy
Player
Katie Swan
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amandine Monnot
Player
Katie Swan
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
47%
(
21 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
43
Total Points Won
49
|
3-6 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Mirjam Bjorklund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
105 of
147)
6
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
0
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
60 of
105)
33%
(
15 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
68 of
147)
122
Total Points Won
123
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Ankita Raina
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Makenna Jones
83%
(
55 of
66)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
2
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
96)
93
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
53%
(
54 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
5
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
48%
(
48 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
53 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(2) 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktorija Golubic
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
71%
(
75 of
105)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
54 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Emma Navarro
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Dalma Galfi
74%
(
67 of
90)
1st Serve %
74%
(
80 of
108)
1
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
50 of
80)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
108)
100
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Swan Vs Bjorklund Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
