L. Ma
To Win
W. Osuigwe
To Win
Katherine Sebov vs Lea Ma Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W L L L
Form
W W L W L W W L L WHead To Head: Sebov 1 - 0 Ma
They have played 2 sets in total, with Sebov winning 2 and Ma winning 0. The last match between Sebov and Ma was at the W75 Sumter, 05-06-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Hard, with Katherine Sebov getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Katherine Sebov | 1 |
| Lea Ma | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W75 Sumter(05-06-2025)
Katherine Sebov
Lea Ma
6
3
6
2
| Sebov | Stats | Ma |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (23-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (18-13) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 301 | Ranking | 351 |
| 136 | Highest Rank | 345 |
| 26 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 5 | Titles | 1 |
| 60% (282-191) | Career Total W/L | 62% (84-51) |
| $189,575 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
18 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Boisson VS Tomova PREDICTION Clay
European Open - Hamburg wta
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Comesana VS Bublik PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Katherine Sebov
Player
Lea Ma
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:56:29 | Average Match Time | 1:56:29 |
| 68% (53/78) | 1st Serve % | 45% (23/51) |
| 64% (34/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (12/23) |
| 68% (17/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 61% (17/28) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/6) |
| 43% (22/51) | Return Points Win % | 35% (27/78) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sebov vs Ma Match Preview :
- How do second serve statistics influence match predictions between Sebov and Ma? Ma outperforms Sebov slightly, winning 38.94% of points compared to Sebov's 37.08%.
- When examining return game statistics over the past six months, Ma also holds an advantage, winning 49.9% of points on their opponent's second serve, compared to Sebov's 45.81%.
- Sebov has an edge in first serve return stats, winning 40.65% of points, while Ma manages just 29.99%.
- Under high-pressure situations, Ma excels in saving breakpoints, with a rate of 50.88%, whereas Sebov saves 45.09%.
- Looking at their overall match performance over the past year, Ma has a marginally higher win rate at 63.79% compared to Sebov's 63.16%.
- Both players perform best on indoor hard courts, with Sebov winning 68% of matches, slightly better than Ma's 64% on the same surface.
- Their performance in Challengers/ITF tournaments shows Sebov winning 64.15%, nearly matching Ma at 63.79%.
- Sebov faces higher-ranked opponents on average (rank 340.39) than Ma (rank 383.03), which could suggest greater experience against stronger competitors.
- How do they perform in deciding set situations? Ma has a higher win rate of 56% in deciding sets compared to Sebov's 50%.
- Ma converts more breakpoint chances, at 48.11%, signaling efficiency in critical moments, surpassing Sebov's 38.67% conversion rate.
Editorial Prediction (June 5, 2025, UTC):
Considering recent performance metrics, Ma's superior statistics in second serve and return games offer a distinct advantage in this matchup. Ma's ability to save breakpoints more effectively reinforces their high-pressure play.
Despite Sebov's stronger first serve returns and experiences against higher-ranked opponents, Ma's consistent break point conversions and higher deciding set win rate enhance their likelihood of success.
Both players excel on indoor hard surfaces, but Ma's marginally superior match win percentage combined with efficient critical point play positions them as the likely winner in the upcoming encounter.
Sebov vs Ma Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Katherine Sebov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Haley Giavara
Player
Katherine Sebov
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sahaja Yamalapalli
Player
Katherine Sebov
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Xiaodi You
Player
Katherine Sebov
57%
(
50 of
87)
1st Serve %
74%
(
61 of
82)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katherine Sebov
Player
Liv Hovde
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Katherine Sebov
52%
(
50 of
97)
1st Serve %
74%
(
88 of
119)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
61 of
119)
115
Total Points Won
101
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katherine Sebov
Player
Unknown Player
84%
(
65 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
96)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katherine Sebov
Player
Lea Ma
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katherine Sebov
Player
En Shuo Liang
83%
(
66 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Lea Ma Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Olivia Lincer
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Lea Ma
79%
(
82 of
104)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
46 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
97
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Mateas
Player
Lea Ma
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Olivia Lincer
42%
(
26 of
62)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Ariana Arseneault
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katherine Sebov
Player
Lea Ma
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Kristina Liutova
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
55
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Robin Anderson
Player
Lea Ma
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (282/191) | Win/Loss | 62% (84/51) |
| 59% (631/441) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (183/113) |
| 54% (5191/4452) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (1487/1170) |
| 59% (169/116) | Hard Win/Loss | 64% (55/31) |
| 55% (50/41) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (22/15) |
| 67% (60/30) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (7/4) |
| 43% (3/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 342 | Aces Total | 323 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1045 | Total Double Faults | 235 |
| 1:29:10 | Average Match Time | 1:31:2 |
| 469.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 419.81 |
| 72% (19843/27616) | 1st Serve % | 59% (4351/7437) |
| 58% (11571/19843) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (2820/4351) |
| 46% (3607/7771) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1488/3085) |
| 50% (1762/3535) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (514/1033) |
| 47% (12795/27045) | Return Points Win % | 47% (3782/7985) |
| 46% (6/7) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (3/9) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (3/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (8/9) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (247/158) | Challenger W/L | 62% (81/49) |
| 71% (15/6) | Futures W/L | 60% (3/2) |
| 60% (277/462) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (84/128) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 53% (48/90) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (11/19) |
| 49% (65/134) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (16/29) |
| 86% (282/243) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (89/79) |
| 14% (282/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (89/10) |
| 21% (190/39) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (46/5) |
Sebov vs. Ma Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
