Katherine Barnes vs Aurora Zantedeschi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W W W L L L
Form
W W W W L L W W L LHead To Head: Barnes 1 - 0 Zantedeschi
They have played 3 sets in total, with Barnes winning 2 and Zantedeschi winning 1. The last match between Barnes and Zantedeschi was at the W35 Sao Paulo, 09-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Katherine Barnes getting the victory 6-7(6) 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Katherine Barnes | 1 |
| Aurora Zantedeschi | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Sao Paulo(09-04-2025)
6
7
6
1
6
2
| Barnes | Stats | Zantedeschi |
|---|---|---|
| 38% (5-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 68% (15-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 758 | Ranking | 320 |
| 757 | Highest Rank | 310 |
| 23 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 2 |
| 56% (45-36) | Career Total W/L | 58% (205-151) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $2,438 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Musetti VS Zverev PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
14 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Zheng PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
14 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Barnes VS Zantedeschi H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(6) 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Katherine Barnes
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
48%
(
34 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
56%
(
40 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
Barnes VS Zantedeschi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 10 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:23:32 | Average Match Time | 2:23:32 |
| 48% (34/71) | 1st Serve % | 73% (58/80) |
| 53% (18/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (27/58) |
| 35% (13/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (8/22) |
| 64% (9/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (6/8) |
| 56% (45/80) | Return Points Win % | 56% (40/71) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Barnes vs Zantedeschi Match Preview :
In assessing the upcoming tennis showdown between Zantedeschi and Barnes, the recent performance statistics provide a clear perspective on the likely outcome. Over the past six months, Zantedeschi has demonstrated a slightly lower second serve point win percentage at 39.23% compared to Barnes’ 42.54%. Given the strong correlation between second serve success and match predictions, Barnes appears to hold a slight edge in this aspect.
Analyzing return game performance reveals that Zantedeschi has secured 47.7% of points on their opponent's second serve, narrowly outpacing Barnes, who has achieved 47.42% in the same category. However, the duo’s first serve return capabilities show Barnes marginally leading with 31.76% over Zantedeschi's 31.47%, indicating closely matched abilities that could influence predictions in their head-to-head clash.
Under pressure scenarios also offer vital insight. Zantedeschi has succeeded in saving 48.09% of the breakpoints faced recently, a figure surpassing Barnes’ 41.61%. Breakpoint opportunities themselves reflect another disparity; Zantedeschi has converted 45.1% while Barnes manages 39.42%. These statistics could prove crucial for in-game betting tips.
Looking at overall performances, Zantedeschi holds a leading edge with a 62.69% match win rate over the last year, bettering Barnes’ 55.56%. These percentages stem from varying event levels, as both players primarily competed in the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K. Zantedeschi's superior win rate there (62.5%) again surpasses Barnes (51.52%). Further, Zantedeschi’s opponents have been slightly higher-ranked on average at 397.3 over Barnes’ 401.27, suggesting a slightly more challenging path to their victories.
Examining surface preferences, Zantedeschi exhibits a dominant win rate on clay at 60%, yet struggles on indoor hard courts with 33%. Conversely, Barnes excels on hard surfaces, winning 68%. If the match were decided by surface conditions alone, Barnes might be favored on a hard court, while Zantedeschi would thrive on clay.
Perhaps a telling statistic relevant to a potential deciding set scenario is that Zantedeschi has clinched 71% of such sets in the past year, overshadowing Barnes’ 67% success rate. Ultimately, the data suggests that while both players boast remarkable competencies, Zantedeschi's consistent performance across various metrics positions them slightly ahead, indicating a higher likelihood of claiming victory in this matchup.
Barnes vs Zantedeschi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Katherine Barnes Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Hollie Smart
Player
Katherine Barnes
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Thaisa Grana Pedretti
Player
Katherine Barnes
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
8 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
41
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katherine Barnes
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
48%
(
34 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
56%
(
40 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
75
|
6-7(6) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katherine Barnes
Player
Leticia Garcia Vidal
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
73)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
14
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 1-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Fernanda Labrana
Player
Katherine Barnes
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katherine Barnes
Player
Catarina Ibiraba Melleiro
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Aurora Zantedeschi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alisa Oktiabreva
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aurora Zantedeschi
Player
Fernanda Labrana
59%
(
55 of
93)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
46 of
82)
96
Total Points Won
79
|
6-0 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aurora Zantedeschi
Player
Laura Badia
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
47%
(
22 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katherine Barnes
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
48%
(
34 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
56%
(
40 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
75
|
6-7(6) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katarzyna Kawa
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
58%
(
7 of
12)
1st Serve %
79%
(
15 of
19)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
6 of
7)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
16
Total Points Won
15
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aurora Zantedeschi
Player
Romina Ccuno
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve %
75%
(
3 of
4)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
67%
(
2 of
3)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
7
Total Points Won
1
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Aurora Zantedeschi
Player
Iryna Shymanovich
63%
(
65 of
104)
1st Serve %
58%
(
66 of
113)
5
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
48 of
113)
108
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (45/36) | Win/Loss | 58% (205/151) |
| 54% (98/85) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (451/360) |
| 52% (857/792) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3927/3490) |
| 62% (13/8) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (30/22) |
| 61% (25/16) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (169/115) |
| 37% (7/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 30% (6/14) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 47 | Aces Total | 369 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 119 | Total Double Faults | 1040 |
| 1:18:45 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 340.35 | Average Opponent Rank | 456.94 |
| 60% (2275/3814) | 1st Serve % | 64% (12272/19214) |
| 59% (1333/2275) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (7303/12272) |
| 49% (750/1539) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3136/6942) |
| 49% (234/473) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1233/2498) |
| 47% (1767/3797) | Return Points Win % | 47% (9146/19522) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 50% (23/23) | Challenger W/L | 58% (125/91) |
| 63% (22/13) | Futures W/L | 58% (78/57) |
| 56% (45/80) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (204/353) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (6/12) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (31/60) |
| 65% (13/20) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (59/100) |
| 93% (41/38) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (204/179) |
| 7% (41/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (204/25) |
| 18% (40/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (152/26) |
Barnes vs. Zantedeschi Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
