Katharina Hobgarski vs Jenny Duerst Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 20 Jun at 09:54 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Hobgarski vs J. Duerst

GER
1
Win
Played
1
Win

SUI
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Hobgarski 1 - 1 Duerst
They have played 5 sets in total, with Katharina Hobgarski winning 3 and Jenny Duerst winning 2. The last match between Katharina Hobgarski and Jenny Duerst was at the W35 Klosters, 20-06-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Katharina Hobgarski getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hobgarski | 1 |
| Duerst | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(QF) W35 Klosters(06-20-25)
(QF) W35 Klosters(06-28-24)
K. Hobgarski vs J. Duerst H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $39,739 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 65.14% (383-205) | Career Total W/L | 57.35% (234-174) |
| 1 | Clay | 1 |
| 19 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
K. Hobgarski vs J. Duerst Match Preview:
- In recent form, Duerst has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 37.09% of points compared to Hobgarski's 33.71%. Does this give Duerst a serving advantage?
- Hobgarski shows comparable return game effectiveness, with a marginally lower 48.11% success on opponents' second serve points against Duerst’s 48.54%.
- Hobgarski proves stronger during critical moments, saving 48.54% of breakpoints, while Duerst manages to save just 41.99%. Could this be crucial in tight match scenarios?
- Duerst has a higher overall match win percentage over the past year at 72.22% compared to Hobgarski's 67.61%, indicating better form.
- Both players prefer different surfaces, with Hobgarski excelling on Clay and Duerst on Hard courts. Which might influence outcomes given the surface?
- At the Challenger/ITF level, Duerst has a higher win rate at 66.67% compared to Hobgarski's 62.75%.
- In direct head-to-head competition, Duerst leads with a 1-0 record, having won their only match on Clay.
- Mental fortitude can decide matches; Duerst has performed better, winning 63% of deciding sets compared to Hobgarski's 41%.
- When it comes to break point conversion, Hobgarski leads with 44.44% success over Duerst's 39.38%.
Editorial Prediction (June 20, 2025, UTC):
As we assess the upcoming match, Duerst appears to have a slight advantage in second serve points and overall match win percentage over the past year. These factors can critically influence the momentum of the match.
However, Hobgarski shows resilience under pressure, showcased by their higher breakpoint save rate. Such mental toughness could prove pivotal in close games.
While surface preference plays a role, with Duerst preferring Hard courts and Hobgarski excelling on Clay, this specific match context on Clay offers no strong advantage to Hobgarski, given Duerst's previous victory on this surface.
Ultimately, based on these comparative stats and previous match outcomes, Jenny Duerst is more likely to win the upcoming tennis match, prevailing through consistent recent form and head-to-head record against Hobgarski.
Katharina Hobgarski vs Jenny Duerst Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Hobgarski vs J. Duerst H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 27 | Games Won | 21 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:14:59 | Average Match Time | 2:14:59 |
| 65% (122/189) | 1st Serve % | 59% (93/158) |
| 61% (75/122) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (56/93) |
| 49% (33/67) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (27/65) |
| 43% (9/21) | Break Pts Won % | 37% (7/19) |
| 47% (75/158) | Return Points Win % | 43% (81/189) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
K. Hobgarski Recent Matches Played
J. Duerst Recent Matches Played

K. Hobgarski vs J. Duerst Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.14% (383/205) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.35% (234/174) |
| 62.09% (827/505) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.64% (520/398) |
| 54.65% (6515/5406) | Games Win/Loss | 53.69% (4397/3792) |
| 58.46% (38/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.84% (101/65) |
| 68.35% (311/144) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.78% (111/88) |
| 51.52% (34/32) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51.16% (22/21) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 323 | Aces Total | 393 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 1789 | Total Double Faults | 1189 |
| 1:28:7 | Average Match Time | 1:23:13 |
| 542.45 | Average Opponent Rank | 491.09 |
| 67% (23051/34484) | 1st Serve % | 66% (14924/22638) |
| 58% (13307/23051) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (8965/14924) |
| 44% (5074/11432) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3489/7716) |
| 52% (2655/5093) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1540/3122) |
| 50% (17599/35114) | Return Points Win % | 48% (11101/23318) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 32.14% (9/19) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 64.27% (250/139) | Challenger W/L | 55.70% (132/105) |
| 74.55% (123/42) | Futures W/L | 60.36% (102/67) |
| 66% (375/570) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (226/399) |
| 57% (4/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (55/102) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (29/65) |
| 60% (96/160) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (51/111) |
| 91% (348/315) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (239/205) |
| 9% (348/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (239/33) |
| 27% (240/65) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (169/28) |