Kasidit Samrej vs Masamichi Imamura Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W W L W W W L
Form
W L W W W L W L W LH2H: Samrej 0 - 2 Imamura
They have played 5 sets in total, with Samrej winning 1 and Imamura winning 4. The last match between Samrej and Imamura was at the Pune Challenger, 16-02-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Masamichi Imamura getting the victory 3-6 7-6(4) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kasidit Samrej | 0 |
| Masamichi Imamura | 2 |
Pune Challenger(16-02-2025)
3
6
7
6
6
4
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Safiullin VS Mensik PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
24 Mar 2025 / Third
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Svitolina VS Swiatek PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
24 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 |
Stats 
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Kasidit Samrej
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
50 of
65)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
35 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
107
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Kasidit Samrej
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
2
1
Sets Won
4
22
Games Won
28
12
Aces (Total)
7
9
Total Double Faults
3
2:1:21
Average Match Time
2:1:21
57% (98/172)
1st Serve %
63% (100/159)
71% (70/98)
1st Serve Win %
70% (70/100)
49% (36/74)
2nd Serve Win %
58% (34/59)
38% (3/8)
Break Points Won % (Total)
32% (6/19)
35% (55/159)
Return Points Win %
38% (66/172)
0% (0/2)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (2/2)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
100% (1/1)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kasidit Samrej vs Masamichi Imamura Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kasidit Samrej 0 - 2 Masamichi Imamura
- Recent Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, there has been a noticeable distinction in the success of Samrej and Imamura on their second serve. Samrej's winning percentage stands at 49.62%, while Imamura has a higher success rate of 53.59%. It is worth noting the significant correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Return Game Statistics: In their recent encounters, Samrej has demonstrated their prowess on return games by winning 52.65% of their opponent's second serve points. On the other hand, Imamura has achieved a slightly lower rate of 51.15%. The disparity is more apparent when analyzing the success rate of first serve returns, with Samrej at 31.95% and Imamura at 32.34%. These figures provide valuable insights into predicting the favorite in their head-to-head (H2H) matchup.
- Performance Under Pressure: Under pressure, Samrej has proven adept at saving breakpoints, with a save rate of 61.49% in recent matches. Comparatively, Imamura has also displayed resilience, saving 61.05% of breakpoints. This statistic holds relevance for in-game betting predictions.
- Overall Performance Overview: Evaluating their performance over the past year, both Samrej and Imamura have achieved commendable records. Samrej has emerged victorious in 64.41% of their matches played (38 wins and 21 losses), while Imamura boasts a slightly lower win percentage of 63.53% (54 wins and 31 losses). These statistics provide an overview for predicting the head-to-head outcome.
- Surface Specialization: An analysis of their career win percentages on different surfaces reveals interesting trends. Samrej has thrived on hard courts, winning 55% of their matches (104 wins and 86 losses), whereas their performance on clay courts has been less successful, achieving a win percentage of 0% (0 wins and 1 loss). Conversely, Imamura excels on indoor hard courts, with a win percentage of 67% (6 wins and 3 losses). However, their performance on clay courts is relatively weaker, with a win percentage of 50% (6 wins and 6 losses).
- Player Level: In the past year, Samrej primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a $10K prize pool. They maintained an impressive win rate of 70.73% (29 wins and 12 losses) in these events. Similarly, Imamura participated in the same tournaments and achieved a commendable win percentage of 70.31% (45 wins and 19 losses). When assessing player stats to predict the favorite, it is crucial to consider the event level at which they have been competing.
- Direct Head-to-Head Matches: Samrej and Imamura have met only once before. Unfortunately, Samrej was unable to secure a victory, while Imamura emerged triumphantly. The two players have competed in two sets, with Samrej failing to win any and Imamura winning both. The most recent encounter between the two occurred at the M25 Tay Ninh tournament on September 28, 2022, played on a hard court. Masamichi Imamura claimed a resounding 6-3, 6-3 victory.
- Head-to-Head Match Duration: Analyzing their previous head-to-head matches, the average duration of games between Samrej and Imamura has been approximately 1 hour and 32 minutes.
- Deciding Set H2H Prediction: Throughout their encounters, Samrej and Imamura have never played a deciding set against each other. Consequently, there is no historical data to predict the outcome if this match were to extend to a deciding set.
- Head-to-Head Extreme Pressure Situations: Remarkably, Samrej and Imamura have yet to face each other in a tiebreak scenario. Therefore, there is no record of their performance or success in extreme pressure situations.
- Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the past 12 months, Samrej's opponents have maintained an average rank of 416.32, while Imamura's competitors have possessed an average rank of 432.87. These statistics shed light on the level of competition faced by the players.
- Deciding Set Performance vs. All Players: When analyzing their performance in deciding sets over the last year, Samrej has emerged victorious in 42% of such sets, whereas Imamura has performed better with a win rate of 52% across all matches played on the tour. These figures provide valuable insights for live predictions and betting if the match were to enter a deciding set.
- Current Event H2H Statistics: While past player performance proves valuable in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to consider current event statistics for an accurate indication of a player's current form. For specific insights into the ongoing event, refer to the section below (if available). Additionally, it should be acknowledged that certain players may perform better in particular events, influencing the predicted outcome.
- Break Point Conversion: In their recent performances, Samrej has converted 37.2% of their opportunities to break their opponents' serve, whereas Imamura boasts a higher conversion rate of 40.96%. This statistic holds significant relevance for live betting tips, especially when either player is presented with a break point opportunity.
- If you are intrigued by models that forecast tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. However, note that it caters to statistics enthusiasts.
Kasidit Samrej Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Kasidit Samrej
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve %
51%
(
19 of
37)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
6 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
41
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kasidit Samrej
Player
Oleksii Krutykh
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kasidit Samrej
Player
Alexandr Binda
46%
(
26 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kasidit Samrej
Player
Erik Grevelius
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
94%
(
16 of
17)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Kasidit Samrej
42%
(
15 of
36)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kasidit Samrej
Player
Jacopo Berrettini
46%
(
42 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
6
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
7
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
6-2 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kasidit Samrej
Player
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
49%
(
41 of
83)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
3
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Kasidit Samrej
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
50 of
65)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
35 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Kasidit Samrej
56%
(
58 of
104)
1st Serve %
59%
(
91 of
155)
24
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
6
91%
(
53 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
59 of
91)
61%
(
28 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
22%
(
23 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
67 of
155)
148
Total Points Won
111
|
6-2 4-6 3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Kasidit Samrej
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Masamichi Imamura Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mikalai Haliak
Player
Masamichi Imamura
47%
(
44 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
48%
(
24 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Zhenxiong Dong
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tianhui Zhang
Player
Masamichi Imamura
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Zhengyu Sun
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
2-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Masamichi Imamura
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Jay Clarke
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Blake Ellis
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
4
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Kasidit Samrej
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
50 of
65)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
35 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Masamichi Imamura
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Aryan Shah
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
55% (114/94)
Win/Loss
60% (150/100)
57% (263/202)
Sets Win/Loss
59% (330/230)
52% (2277/2086)
Games Win/Loss
54% (2833/2414)
55% (110/89)
Hard Win/Loss
60% (138/91)
0% (0/1)
Clay Win/Loss
50% (6/6)
50% (4/4)
Indoor Hard W/L
67% (6/3)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.54
Aces Per Game
0.14
1139
Aces Total
357
0.34
Double Faults Per Game
0.1
715
Total Double Faults
254
1:28:14
Average Match Time
1:7:49
484.47
Average Opponent Rank
449.99
61% (7510/12213)
1st Serve %
66% (7586/11504)
72% (5420/7510)
1st Serve Win %
66% (4983/7586)
49% (2322/4703)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (1950/3918)
41% (457/1126)
Break Points Won % (Total)
45% (571/1267)
38% (4548/11859)
Return Points Win %
42% (4950/11845)
0% (0/1)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
25% (2/6)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
45% (19/23)
Challenger W/L
45% (18/22)
59% (93/64)
Futures W/L
63% (132/78)
56% (109/195)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
60% (149/248)
50% (2/4)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
53% (30/57)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
52% (28/54)
32% (17/53)
Deciding Set Win %
50% (30/60)
84% (121/102)
1st Set Won, Won Match
91% (150/136)
16% (121/19)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
9% (150/14)
14% (87/12)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
14% (100/14)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
