M. Imamura
To Win
K. Samrej
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L L W L L LForm
L L L L W W W W W LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Samrej winning 2 and Sun winning 1. The last match between Samrej and Sun was at the Gwangju Challenger, 20-04-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Hard, with Kasidit Samrej getting the victory 6-7(2) 6-4 7-5.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Kasidit Samrej | 1 |
Fajing Sun | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Gwangju Challenger(20-04-2025)
Samrej | Stats | Sun |
---|---|---|
40% (8-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (10-9) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
388 | Ranking | 198 |
388 | Highest Rank | 198 |
24 | Age | 28 |
- | Plays | R |
4 | Titles | 7 |
54% (117-101) | Career Total W/L | 56% (275-213) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $23,950 |
0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
- / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-7(2) 6-4 7-5 |
![]() ![]()
Kasidit Samrej
Player
Fajing Sun
52%
(
76 of
147)
1st Serve %
68%
(
81 of
120)
13
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
49%
(
35 of
71)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
45%
(
10 of
22)
Break Points Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
48%
(
71 of
147)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
59 of
120)
135
Total Points Won
132
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
19 | Games Won | 16 |
13 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
5 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
3:3:17 | Average Match Time | 3:3:17 |
52% (76/147) | 1st Serve % | 68% (81/120) |
54% (41/76) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (42/81) |
49% (35/71) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (19/39) |
45% (10/22) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 31% (8/26) |
49% (59/120) | Return Points Win % | 48% (71/147) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
In recent months, Sun has exhibited a slight edge over Samrej in second serve performance, winning 44.01% of points compared to Samrej's 41.6%. Such statistics are crucial in formulating accurate match predictions. Additionally, Sun has shown prowess in converting breakpoint opportunities, achieving a 43.75% conversion rate, whereas Samrej stands at 24.59%. This difference could become significant during live gameplay when breakpoints are at stake.
Comparing return game stats, Sun has secured 44.03% of points on opponent's second serve in recent form, closely matched by Samrej, who has registered a 44.74% success rate. For first serve returns, Sun registers at 23.51% with Samrej slightly leading at 24.09%. These statistics are pivotal in assessing who might hold the upper hand in this head-to-head matchup. Under pressure, however, Samrej appears more resilient, saving 58.16% of breakpoints compared to Sun's 52.14%, suggesting an advantage for Samrej in critical moments.
Analyzing their performance over the last year, Sun has won 65.33% of matches, translating to a record of 49 wins and 26 losses. Meanwhile, Samrej has maintained a slightly better win rate at 66.67%, with 40 wins and 20 losses. Sun has demonstrated proficiency on indoor hard courts with a career win percentage of 60%, while Samrej excels on hard courts with a 55% win rate. Both players have found clay to be their least successful surface, with Sun winning 51% and Samrej winning none of their matches.
Both players have demonstrated similar accomplishments on the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level over the past 12 months, with Sun achieving a 78.72% win rate and Samrej at 78.13%. However, the level of opponents faced differs, with Sun competing against players averaging a rank of 384.51, while Samrej encounters slightly higher-ranked opponents, averaging at 371.4. This difference may impact their relative performance against each other.
In matches that extend to a deciding set, Sun holds a distinct advantage, having won 57% of deciding sets in the last year compared to Samrej's 36%. This statistic could prove influential if the match reaches such a scenario. Ultimately, with the overarching statistical data presented, Sun appears slightly more favorable to emerge victorious, though Samrej's strengths under pressure and in certain return statistics add an intriguing layer to this prediction.
Samrej vs Sun Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Robert Strombachs
Player
Kasidit Samrej
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Martin Damm
Player
Kasidit Samrej
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
14
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Yusuke Takahashi
Player
Kasidit Samrej
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
41%
(
36 of
87)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Kasidit Samrej
Player
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
41%
(
19 of
46)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
James McCabe
Player
Kasidit Samrej
49%
(
49 of
99)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
20
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
7
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
62%
(
31 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
30 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ye Cong Mo
Player
Kasidit Samrej
47%
(
28 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Kasidit Samrej
Player
Linang Xiao
58%
(
63 of
109)
1st Serve %
55%
(
62 of
113)
6
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
39 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(2) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Rio Noguchi
Player
Kasidit Samrej
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniil Glinka
Player
Fajing Sun
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Fajing Sun
Player
Alex Bolt
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
38 of
44)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
16 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Fajing Sun
Player
Ilia Simakin
54%
(
43 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Fajing Sun
Player
Ryan Peniston
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Fajing Sun
Player
Antoine Escoffier
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
53%
(
54 of
102)
8
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
113
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(8) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Fajing Sun
Player
Li Tu
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
60)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Fajing Sun
49%
(
39 of
80)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
83)
9
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Kasidit Samrej
Player
Fajing Sun
52%
(
76 of
147)
1st Serve %
68%
(
81 of
120)
13
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
49%
(
35 of
71)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
45%
(
10 of
22)
Break Points Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
48%
(
71 of
147)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
59 of
120)
135
Total Points Won
132
|
6-7(2) 6-4 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
54% (117/101) | Win/Loss | 56% (275/213) |
55% (271/218) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (607/480) |
52% (2394/2220) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5319/4679) |
54% (113/96) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (230/171) |
0% (0/1) | Clay Win/Loss | 51% (39/38) |
50% (4/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (6/4) |
0.53 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
1187 | Aces Total | 907 |
0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
762 | Total Double Faults | 826 |
1:29:37 | Average Match Time | 1:25:27 |
476.3 | Average Opponent Rank | 496.13 |
61% (7975/13059) | 1st Serve % | 63% (17042/26917) |
72% (5742/7975) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (11501/17042) |
49% (2505/5084) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (5171/9875) |
40% (482/1198) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1289/2911) |
38% (4851/12681) | Return Points Win % | 41% (11374/27559) |
0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 29% (2/5) |
25% (2/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 14% (1/6) |
43% (22/29) | Challenger W/L | 41% (51/73) |
59% (93/65) | Futures W/L | 63% (221/128) |
55% (112/205) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (270/479) |
50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
51% (32/63) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (56/119) |
33% (19/57) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (54/112) |
84% (122/103) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (284/247) |
16% (122/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (284/35) |
15% (96/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (204/27) |