Karlo Cubelic vs Andrea DEL Federico Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cubelic vs Federico analysis and find out who is favored!
Karlo Cubelic vs Andrea DEL Federico Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cubelic has won 50.4% of points on his second serve, while Federico has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cubelic, in recent form, has won 50.2% of his opponent's second serve points, while Federico has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.51% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cubelic has saved 55.93% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Federico has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cubelic has won 55.77% of matches played (W/L 29/ 23), with Federico winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cubelic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 60/ 50), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 11/ 11). Federico has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Cubelic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.86% of matches (W/L 29/ 22), where as Federico has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cubelic has played against opponents with an average rank of 53.52 while Federico has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cubelic has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Federico has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cubelic has converted 45.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Federico has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cubelic 0 - 0 Federico
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Karlo Cubelic | Andrea DEL Federico |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 62% (8/5) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 66% (19/10) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 58% (150/108) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0.09 | N/A |
Aces Total | 12 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0.17 | N/A |
DFs Total | 21 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 67% (190/282) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 73% (139/190) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 42% (39/92) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 53% (10/19) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 36% (104/291) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 62% (8/5) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (8/13) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/3) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 73% (11/8) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 27% (11/3) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | N/A |
Karlo Cubelic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 3-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Drew Van Orderlain
Player
Karlo Cubelic
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
76
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Karlo Cubelic
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Leopold Zima
Player
Karlo Cubelic
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-6(0) 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Andrea DEL Federico Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Andrea Del Federico
40%
(
18 of
45)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Andrea Del Federico
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
43%
(
18 of
42)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-7(5) 6-1 10-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Facundo Yunis
Player
Andrea Del Federico
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Andrea Del Federico
Player
Anurag Agarwal
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Andrea Del Federico
Player
Nikita Bortnichek
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Dominik Palan
Player
Andrea Del Federico
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andrea Del Federico
Player
Pol Wattanakul
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
35%
(
17 of
48)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
11
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more