P. Kovapitukted
To Win
D. Frayman
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W W L W W LForm
W L L L W L L W L WThey have played 1 sets in total, with Bartone winning 0 and Frayman winning 1. The last match between Bartone and Frayman was at the W35 Manchester, 16-02-2025, Q1 round, I.hard with Daria Frayman getting the victory 7-5 ret..
W35 Manchester(16-02-2025)
- / Second
Miami Open - Miami wta
20 Mar 2025 / Second
Miami Open - Miami wta
19 Mar 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 ret. |
![]() ![]()
Daria Frayman
Player
Kamilla Bartone
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
49
Total Points Won
41
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Recent Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, Bartone has exhibited a commendable level of skill by winning 46.87% of points on their second serve. Similarly, Frayman has demonstrated proficiency, securing victory in 45.71% of the same points. It is worth noting that there exists a substantial correlation between this statistical aspect and the accuracy of match predictions.
Return Game Statistics: An examination of return game statistics reveals that Bartone, in recent form, has remarkably triumphed in 54.23% of their opponent's second serve points. On the other hand, Frayman has proven to be even more formidable, conquering an impressive 59.76%. Notably, the percentages for first serve returns stand at 40.14% and 46.17% for Bartone and Frayman respectively. This factor significantly contributes to the determination of the favored player in their upcoming head-to-head encounter.
Under Pressure Analysis: When placed under pressure, Bartone has exhibited a remarkable ability to save a substantial 50.91% of breakpoints in recent times. Frayman, however, has demonstrated an even greater resilience by saving 57.64% of such pivotal moments. Undoubtedly, this particular statistic holds considerable value in the realm of in-game betting predictions.
Performance Overview: Over the course of the last year, Bartone has emerged victorious in an impressive 67.27% of matches played, boasting a Win/Loss record of 37/18. Meanwhile, Frayman has attained an enviable 70.97% success rate, with a Win/Loss record of 44/18. Taken as a whole, this comprehensive overview provides valuable insights into the anticipated outcome of their upcoming encounter.
Preferred Surface: Bartone has demonstrated a pronounced proficiency on Hard courts throughout their career, achieving victory in an impressive 63% of matches played on this surface (Win/Loss record of 35/21). Conversely, their performance on Clay courts has been relatively weaker, with a win percentage of 60% (Win/Loss record of 62/41). Frayman, on the other hand, has excelled on Hard courts, boasting a remarkable career win percentage of 76% (Win/Loss record of 60/19). However, their performance on Indoor Hard courts leaves room for improvement, with a win percentage of 33% (Win/Loss record of 1/2).
Player Level: In the past year, Bartone has predominantly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a prize pool exceeding $10,000. Their success rate in such tournaments stands at an admirable 53.57% (Win/Loss record of 15/13). Conversely, Frayman has participated in a larger number of Challengers/ITF tournaments with similar prize pools, achieving victory in 58.82% of matches played (Win/Loss record of 20/14). When comparing statistical data between players to make predictions about the favored athlete, it is important to consider the relative level of competition they have faced in their respective events.
Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the course of the past 12 months, Bartone has confronted opponents with an average ranking of 393.96. In contrast, Frayman has encountered adversaries with a slightly higher average ranking of 445.89.
Deciding Set Performance: For those intrigued by live predictions and betting opportunites, it is crucial to assess the performances of both Bartone and Frayman in deciding sets. Over the past year, Bartone has emerged victorious in 50% of deciding sets, whereas Frayman has excelled in 67% of all matches played on the tour. These statistics shed light on their ability to overcome challenging moments and achieve success.
Current Event Head-to-Head Stats: While past player performances indeed provide valuable insights for predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to consider current event statistics to gauge a player's current form. Therefore, it is recommended to refer to the section below for an update on their performances in the present tournament. Additionally, certain players may display heightened abilities and strengths at specific events, which should be taken into account when forecasting the anticipated outcome.
Break Point Conversion: In recent form, Bartone has impressively converted 52.13% of their breakpoint opportunities. Similarly, Frayman has showcased their prowess by converting 51% of their chances to break their opponent's serve. These figures are particularly noteworthy for those seeking in-game live betting tips, as either player may seize the advantage when presented with a breakpoint opportunity.
For individuals interested in models that accurately predict tennis matches, the following article serves as an excellent starting point. It must be noted, however, that this resource is primarily aimed at the enthusiasts and experts of statistical analysis.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kaja Juvan
Player
Kamilla Bartone
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Kamilla Bartone
Player
Tereza Martincova
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Kamilla Bartone
Player
Yana Morderger
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
45%
(
18 of
40)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
47%
(
20 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
50
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Priscilla Hon
Player
Kamilla Bartone
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
31%
(
16 of
51)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
9
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kamilla Bartone
Player
Maia Ilinca Burcescu
42%
(
15 of
36)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
56)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
100%
(
15 of
15)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Kamilla Bartone
Player
Arina Gabriela Vasilescu
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Daria Frayman
Player
Kamilla Bartone
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
49
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Manon Leonard
Player
Kamilla Bartone
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kamilla Bartone
Player
Ranah Akua Stoiber
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Kamilla Bartone
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
13
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
43 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daria Frayman
Player
Francesca Pace
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Thasaporn Naklo
Player
Daria Frayman
55%
(
59 of
108)
1st Serve %
69%
(
57 of
83)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
43%
(
21 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
50 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
99
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daria Frayman
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lois Boisson
Player
Daria Frayman
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
72%
(
84 of
117)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
53 of
84)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
38 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
52 of
117)
117
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Vivian Wolff
Player
Daria Frayman
82%
(
64 of
78)
1st Serve %
77%
(
68 of
88)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
83
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 5-7 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Daria Frayman
Player
Kamilla Bartone
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
49
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Freya Christie
Player
Daria Frayman
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Daria Frayman
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
78%
(
62 of
80)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Ana Sofia Sanchez
Player
Daria Frayman
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
77%
(
58 of
75)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Daria Frayman
Player
Saumya Vig
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve %
70%
(
23 of
33)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
54
Total Points Won
16
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H |
view more
View full predicted draw for Frayman