Kamil Majchrzak vs Hamad Medjedovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L L L L L L
Form
W W W L L L W W L LHead-To-Head: Majchrzak 1 - 2 Medjedovic
They have played 7 sets in total, with Majchrzak winning 2 and Medjedovic winning 5. The last match between Majchrzak and Medjedovic was at the French Open - Paris, 25-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Hamad Medjedovic getting the victory 6-3 6-3 7-6(2).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kamil Majchrzak | 1 |
| Hamad Medjedovic | 2 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(25-05-2025)
Hamad Medjedovic
Kamil Majchrzak
6
3
6
3
7
6
| Majchrzak | Stats | Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (21-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 66% (19-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 109 | Ranking | 71 |
| 75 | Highest Rank | 61 |
| 29 | Age | 21 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 19 | Titles | 9 |
| 64% (417-233) | Career Total W/L | 64% (164-94) |
| $1,059,510 | Career Prize Money | $932,910 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shapovalov VS Cobolli PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Bublik PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Majchrzak VS Medjedovic H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
68%
(
67 of
99)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
13
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
104
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
| 7-6(1) 6-4 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
48%
(
37 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
4
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Majchrzak VS Medjedovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 31 | Games Won | 41 |
| 14 | Aces (Total) | 24 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 1:48:32 | Average Match Time | 1:48:32 |
| 55% (120/220) | 1st Serve % | 64% (153/238) |
| 65% (78/120) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (111/153) |
| 51% (51/100) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (41/85) |
| 30% (6/20) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 55% (11/20) |
| 36% (86/238) | Return Points Win % | 41% (91/220) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Majchrzak vs Medjedovic Match Preview :
- Second serve performance: Majchrzak has recently won 43.72% of points on his second serve, compared to Medjedovic’s 44.62%. Does a slight edge in second serve points often determine a match outcome? It can be an indicator.
- Return game stats: In recent games, Majchrzak has secured 44.3% of his opponent's second serve points, with Medjedovic slightly better at 45.01%. For first serve returns, Majchrzak scores 24.94% against Medjedovic’s 26.4%. Could this be a decisive factor? It may indeed play a crucial role.
- Ability under pressure: Majchrzak has a breakpoint save percentage of 58.72% versus Medjedovic’s 56.42%. How might this affect their match dynamic? It's significant in maintaining momentum during pressure points.
- Match success rate: Over the past year, Majchrzak has won 70.15% of his matches, while Medjedovic has won 63.49%. Does a higher success rate indicate likely dominance? Often, it suggests consistency.
- Preferred surface: Both excel on clay, with win rates of 66% for Majchrzak and 67% for Medjedovic. Could their surface preference impact the match outcome? It might, particularly on clay.
- Event level performance: Majchrzak has excelled in Challenger/ITF tournaments, winning 76.19% of matches, while Medjedovic boasts a 72% winning rate. Are these event levels indicative of skill diversity? They certainly highlight their adaptability and competitive edge.
- Head-to-head record: Their match history is 1-1, with Majchrzak winning their last encounter on a hard surface. How might past victories influence this challenge? Previous wins can bolster confidence.
- Tiebreak performance: Majchrzak has won all tiebreaks against Medjedovic, a subtle advantage during critical match moments.
- Opponent strength: Majchrzak’s opponents average a rank of 247.48, while Medjedovic's opponents average 165.08. Does stronger opposition enhance player development? Higher-tier opponents often improve tactical skills.
- Deciding set performance: Both players have similarly won 61% of deciding sets, suggesting resilience under prolonged competition.
- Break point conversion: Majchrzak converts break points at 26.9%, marginally higher than Medjedovic’s 25.36%. Is this difference significant? During close matches, it can be pivotal.
Editorial Prediction (May 25, 2025, UTC):
Assessing the players' recent form and head-to-head statistics, Majchrzak shows a slight edge with his slightly higher match success rate over the past year and his better performance in saving breakpoints under pressure. The wins in their direct confrontations highlight his capability to capitalize during critical match segments.
However, Medjedovic's recent second serve and return games statistics, combined with his stronger opponent average ranking, suggest he is honing his skills against challenging competitors and can dynamically adapt his strategy.
Overall, while both players demonstrate proficiency in various facets of the game and compete closely on several parameters, Majchrzak’s experience, performance under pressure, and marginally better track record indicate that he is slightly more favored to win this match.
Majchrzak vs Medjedovic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Kamil Majchrzak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
4
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
68%
(
67 of
99)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
13
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
104
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
10
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
5
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
49 of
63)
67%
(
28 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
30 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Darwin Blanch
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Hugo Dellien
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Hamad Medjedovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
62%
(
64 of
104)
1st Serve %
56%
(
72 of
128)
18
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
6
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
31 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
60 of
128)
133
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
50%
(
52 of
105)
4
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
105)
107
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
68%
(
67 of
99)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
13
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
104
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
49%
(
39 of
79)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
68%
(
92 of
135)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
9%
(
2 of
22)
39%
(
52 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
109)
125
Total Points Won
119
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
59%
(
55 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
91)
5
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
6
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
47 of
65)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
13 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (417/233) | Win/Loss | 64% (164/94) |
| 62% (933/579) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (364/238) |
| 55% (7793/6369) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3087/2636) |
| 66% (103/53) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (34/24) |
| 66% (246/125) | Clay Win/Loss | 67% (85/42) |
| 53% (45/40) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (38/23) |
| 61% (23/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.61 |
| 2331 | Aces Total | 1695 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 1161 | Total Double Faults | 851 |
| 1:20:4 | Average Match Time | 1:38:11 |
| 473.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 310.12 |
| 59% (22863/38526) | 1st Serve % | 62% (10862/17472) |
| 71% (16217/22863) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (7852/10862) |
| 52% (8173/15661) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3360/6610) |
| 45% (1827/4088) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (716/1672) |
| 41% (16075/38892) | Return Points Win % | 39% (6875/17583) |
| 52% (24/22) | Slam W/L | 67% (16/8) |
| 46% (11/13) | Masters W/L | 53% (8/7) |
| 57% (13/10) | Cups W/L | 67% (2/1) |
| 54% (30/26) | Main Tour W/L | 58% (32/23) |
| 63% (205/122) | Challenger W/L | 63% (63/37) |
| 77% (134/39) | Futures W/L | 70% (43/18) |
| 66% (404/613) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (152/240) |
| 27% (7/26) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 58% (7/12) |
| 54% (109/201) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (52/105) |
| 52% (96/186) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (42/72) |
| 88% (424/375) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (162/144) |
| 11% (424/48) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (162/18) |
| 19% (226/43) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (95/19) |
Majchrzak vs. Medjedovic Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
