K. Majchrzak
To Win
H. Medjedovic
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W W W L L LForm
W W W W W L L W W LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Majchrzak winning 1 and Moller winning 2. The last match between Majchrzak and Moller was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 22-04-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Elmer Moller getting the victory 5-7 6-4 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Kamil Majchrzak | 0 |
Elmer Moller | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(22-04-2025)
Majchrzak | Stats | Moller |
---|---|---|
70% (21-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (18-13) |
0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
88 | Ranking | 108 |
75 | Highest Rank | 108 |
29 | Age | 21 |
R | Plays | - |
19 | Titles | 8 |
64% (417-230) | Career Total W/L | 67% (170-85) |
$1,059,510 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5-7 6-4 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Elmer Moller
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
5
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
49 of
63)
67%
(
28 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
30 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
1 | Sets Won | 2 |
15 | Games Won | 17 |
10 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
2:14:38 | Average Match Time | 2:14:38 |
60% (63/105) | 1st Serve % | 58% (57/99) |
78% (49/63) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (41/57) |
48% (20/42) | 2nd Serve Win % | 67% (28/42) |
20% (1/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (2/10) |
30% (30/99) | Return Points Win % | 34% (36/105) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Analyzing the current statistics provides crucial insights into the potential outcomes of the upcoming tennis match between Moller and Majchrzak. Over the last six months, Moller has slightly outperformed Majchrzak by winning 42.55% of points on their second serve, compared to Majchrzak's 42.48%. This marginal difference could prove significant given the high correlation between second serve performance and match prediction accuracy.
Examining return game performance, Moller again has the upper hand, having won 50.52% of their opponent's second serve points, while Majchrzak managed 44.92%. In terms of first serve returns, Moller also leads with a 30.9% success rate, compared to Majchrzak's 24.98%. These stats contribute heavily to predicting which player might be favored in this head-to-head match-up.
Regarding play under pressure, Majchrzak shows superiority by saving 56.73% of breakpoints, outperforming Moller's 51.41%. This indicates Majchrzak's resilience in high-pressure scenarios, which is an essential factor for in-game betting predictions. However, Moller has a stronger breakpoint conversion rate, successfully converting 35.07% of opportunities, as opposed to Majchrzak's 26.67%.
In terms of performance overview, Majchrzak has excelled over the past year, winning 72.86% of matches (W/L 51/19), which surpasses Moller's 66.29% (W/L 59/30). Both players have demonstrated their strengths on clay, with Moller achieving a 72% win rate and Majchrzak a 67% win rate, indicating proficiency on this surface.
When considering the level of competition, Majchrzak has faced opponents of a higher average rank (263.54) compared to Moller's 323.91. Furthermore, Majchrzak has emerged victorious in 75% of matches played in the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, while Moller has 64.79% wins in similar events. In deciding sets, Majchrzak's superior performance is evident, with a 70% win rate in contrast to Moller's 38%.
When synthesizing these statistics, Majchrzak appears to be the favorite to win based on higher overall performance percentages, better play under pressure, and stronger stats in deciding sets. Despite Moller holding advantages in specific areas like breakpoint conversion, the comprehensive analysis points toward Majchrzak as the likely victor in this match-up, given their superior edge in several critical metrics.
Majchrzak vs Moller Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
10
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Elmer Moller
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
5
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
49 of
63)
67%
(
28 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
30 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Darwin Blanch
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Hugo Dellien
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Marin Cilic
66%
(
59 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
4
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
27 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Norbert Gombos
69%
(
84 of
121)
1st Serve %
72%
(
79 of
110)
11
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
57 of
79)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
44 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
110)
116
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(2) 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
73%
(
83 of
114)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
56 of
83)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
114)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(10) 6-4 6-1 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Gigante
Player
Elmer Moller
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Elmer Moller
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Elmer Moller
Player
Facundo Bagnis
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Elmer Moller
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Joao Fonseca
Player
Elmer Moller
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Elmer Moller
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
5
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
49 of
63)
67%
(
28 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
30 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Elmer Moller
Player
Nishesh Basavareddy
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
10
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Elmer Moller
Player
Francisco Comesana
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
64% (417/230) | Win/Loss | 67% (170/85) |
62% (933/572) | Sets Win/Loss | 65% (375/203) |
55% (7763/6325) | Games Win/Loss | 57% (3036/2336) |
66% (103/53) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (37/28) |
66% (246/124) | Clay Win/Loss | 71% (112/46) |
53% (45/40) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66% (21/11) |
64% (23/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
2313 | Aces Total | 534 |
0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
1155 | Total Double Faults | 875 |
1:19:58 | Average Match Time | 1:31:18 |
468.55 | Average Opponent Rank | 405.72 |
59% (22724/38293) | 1st Serve % | 63% (9859/15646) |
71% (16126/22724) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (6602/9859) |
52% (8130/15567) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (2743/5787) |
45% (1822/4076) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (963/2032) |
41% (16002/38667) | Return Points Win % | 46% (7392/16223) |
53% (24/21) | Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) |
46% (11/13) | Masters W/L | 67% (2/1) |
57% (13/10) | Cups W/L | 63% (5/3) |
54% (30/26) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
63% (205/120) | Challenger W/L | 64% (63/35) |
77% (134/39) | Futures W/L | 69% (98/44) |
66% (404/611) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (168/249) |
28% (7/25) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
55% (109/199) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (33/65) |
52% (96/186) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (37/74) |
88% (424/375) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (169/149) |
11% (424/48) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (169/19) |
19% (223/43) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (86/21) |