K. Majchrzak
To Win
H. Medjedovic
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W W W L L LForm
L W W W L W L L W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Majchrzak winning 2 and Blanch winning 0. The last match between Majchrzak and Blanch was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 21-04-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Kamil Majchrzak getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Kamil Majchrzak | 1 |
Darwin Blanch | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(21-04-2025)
Majchrzak | Stats | Blanch |
---|---|---|
70% (21-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 63% (15-9) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
88 | Ranking | 561 |
75 | Highest Rank | 541 |
29 | Age | 17 |
R | Plays | - |
19 | Titles | 1 |
64% (417-230) | Career Total W/L | 57% (56-43) |
$1,059,510 | Career Prize Money | $13,795 |
1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Darwin Blanch
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 5 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
1:10:7 | Average Match Time | 1:10:7 |
61% (33/54) | 1st Serve % | 60% (35/58) |
73% (24/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (21/35) |
57% (12/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (9/23) |
40% (4/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
48% (28/58) | Return Points Win % | 33% (18/54) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Let's set the stage for a delightful clash of rackets, where Blanch and Majchrzak vie for supremacy on the tennis court! In the arena of second serve wizardry this season, Blanch is spinning a delightful 45.59% of second serve magic to acclaim, leaving Majchrzak playing catch-up with a 42.9% hocus-pocus success. The real question is, who will serve up the best jokes... err, serves, in the deciding deuce?
When it comes to turning returns into comedic gold, both players are neck-and-neck, with Blanch claiming 44.38% of opponents’ second serve points and Majchrzak slightly nudging ahead with 44.48%. For first-hand experiences, Blanch leaps ahead with a 27.47% magic act, while Majchrzak is left searching for spare change at 25.06%. Perhaps it's wise to rally around Blanch's charm here!
Blink and you'll miss it—Majchrzak seems to have the upper hand, saving 57.69% of breakpoints, while Blanch offers a valiant 57.91% escape artistry. In the world of spin and slice, performance is key, and Majchrzak has managed to pocket 71.43% of their matches this year, compared to Blanch at 61.7%. Quick, call a fortune teller—because the crystal ball leans slightly toward Majchrzak in this match-up!
As we serve and volley across surfaces, Blanch unfurls their best superhero cape on Hard courts, winning 62%, whereas Majchrzak prefers a Clay canvas with a suave 67% victory dance. Meanwhile, Blanch's opponents average around rank 377.13, giving them an opportunity to practice their Houdini moves, while Majchrzak faces foes averaging a rank of 262.09—no pressure there! For those keeping score at home, Majchrzak holds the slight edge for experienced competition.
Finally, let's pull out the ace card—breakpoint conversions! All eyes will be on Blanch as they convert 35.88% of chances when breakpoints play peek-a-boo, with Majchrzak not missing many marks at 26.32%. Should this showdown go to a third set, Majchrzak might just chuckle the loudest, winning concluding sets 70% of the time, with Blanch leaderboard skiing at 67%.
As the curtain rises and the suspense builds, the prediction based on these stats crowns Majchrzak as the maestro most likely to orchestrate an excellent encore. Let the stunts begin, and may the best server ace their way to victory!
Majchrzak vs Blanch Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
10
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Elmer Moller
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
5
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
49 of
63)
67%
(
28 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
30 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Darwin Blanch
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Hugo Dellien
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Marin Cilic
66%
(
59 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
4
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
27 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Norbert Gombos
69%
(
84 of
121)
1st Serve %
72%
(
79 of
110)
11
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
57 of
79)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
44 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
110)
116
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(2) 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
73%
(
83 of
114)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
56 of
83)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
114)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(10) 6-4 6-1 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Player
Darwin Blanch
74%
(
64 of
86)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
27%
(
6 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Darwin Blanch
Player
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
47
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Darwin Blanch
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Darwin Blanch
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Darwin Blanch
Player
Rodrigo Alujas
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Stefan Dostanic
Player
Darwin Blanch
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Darwin Blanch
Player
Ronald Hohmann
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Darwin Blanch
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
64% (417/230) | Win/Loss | 57% (56/43) |
62% (933/572) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (126/104) |
55% (7763/6325) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1099/1020) |
66% (103/53) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (36/22) |
66% (246/124) | Clay Win/Loss | 49% (20/21) |
53% (45/40) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
64% (23/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
2313 | Aces Total | 242 |
0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
1155 | Total Double Faults | 201 |
1:19:58 | Average Match Time | 1:21:6 |
468.55 | Average Opponent Rank | 349.37 |
59% (22724/38293) | 1st Serve % | 62% (3468/5560) |
71% (16126/22724) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (2313/3468) |
52% (8130/15567) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1045/2092) |
45% (1822/4076) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (231/541) |
41% (16002/38667) | Return Points Win % | 39% (2222/5633) |
53% (24/21) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
46% (11/13) | Masters W/L | 20% (1/4) |
57% (13/10) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
54% (30/26) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
63% (205/120) | Challenger W/L | 10% (1/9) |
77% (134/39) | Futures W/L | 64% (54/30) |
66% (404/611) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (55/98) |
28% (7/25) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
55% (109/199) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (10/21) |
52% (96/186) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (18/33) |
88% (424/375) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (54/45) |
11% (424/48) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (54/9) |
19% (223/43) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (45/11) |