Kalman L. Boyd vs Jibril Nettles Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Boyd vs Nettles analysis and find out who is favored!
Kalman L. Boyd vs Jibril Nettles Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Boyd has won 48.78% of points on his second serve, while Nettles has won 23.08%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Boyd, in recent form, has won 51.35% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nettles has won 28.57%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.98% and 28.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Boyd has saved 53.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nettles has saved 37.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Boyd has won 67.21% of matches played (W/L 41/ 20), with Nettles winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Boyd has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 85/ 59), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 7/ 5). Nettles has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 12/ 14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Boyd has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.21% of matches (W/L 41/ 20), where as Nettles has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 3/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Boyd winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Boyd winning 1 and Nettles winning 2. The last match between Boyd and Nettles was at the M15 Edwardsville, 20-07-2021, Q3, Hard with Jibril Nettles getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Boyd and Nettles have played a deciding set 1 times, with Boyd winning 0 times and Nettles 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Boyd winning 0, and Nettles 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Boyd has played against opponents with an average rank of 82.38 while Nettles has played against players with an average rank of 21.8.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Boyd has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nettles has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Boyd has converted 40% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nettles has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Boyd 0 - 1 Nettles
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
59% (92-64)
Career Total W/L
40% (17-25)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Kalman L. Boyd | Jibril Nettles |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
Games Won | 15 | 19 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-6 6-4 10-5 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Kalman L. Boyd | Jibril Nettles |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Kalman L. Boyd Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
John Sperle
Player
Kalman L. Boyd
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Kalman L. Boyd
Player
Kirill Kolganov
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
6
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 4-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jakub Paul
Player
Kalman L. Boyd
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kalman L. Boyd
Player
Leo Matthysen
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nicolas Kobelt
Player
Kalman L. Boyd
58%
(
67 of
116)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
10
Aces
5
12
Double Faults
7
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
41%
(
20 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
39%
(
45 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
105
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kalman L. Boyd
Player
Cayetano March
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Max Wiskandt
Player
Kalman L. Boyd
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
77%
(
68 of
88)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kalman L. Boyd
Player
Egor Agafonov
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Jibril Nettles Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Adit Sinha
Player
Jibril Nettles
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
3
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 2-6 6-2 10-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Jibril Nettles
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Pierce Brazil Rollins
Player
Jibril Nettles
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Chih Chi Huang
Player
Jibril Nettles
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H |
view more