K. R. Persson
To Win
A. K. Toth
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L L W L W WForm
W L W W W W L L L LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Persson winning 2 and Efremova winning 0. The last match between Persson and Efremova was at the W35 Helsinki, 05-03-2025, Round: First, Surface: I.hard, with Kajsa Rinaldo Persson getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson | 1 |
Ksenia Efremova | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Helsinki(05-03-2025)
Persson | Stats | Efremova |
---|---|---|
58% (11-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 60% (15-10) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
332 | Ranking | 624 |
288 | Highest Rank | 624 |
27 | Age | 16 |
- | Plays | - |
6 | Titles | 3 |
60% (249-166) | Career Total W/L | 76% (38-12) |
$4,080 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
23 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Ksenia Efremova
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 4 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
1:41:9 | Average Match Time | 1:41:9 |
67% (47/70) | 1st Serve % | 63% (33/52) |
51% (24/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 39% (13/33) |
61% (14/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (7/19) |
60% (6/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 23% (3/13) |
62% (32/52) | Return Points Win % | 46% (32/70) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
In evaluating the forthcoming tennis match, an analysis of both players’ second serve points reveals noteworthy insights. Over the past six months, Persson has demonstrated a more robust performance, capturing 45.24% of points on their second serve. In contrast, Efremova's performance on second serve points stands at 38.01%. This statistic is often strongly correlated with predictions concerning match winners.
Further examining return game statistics, Persson seems to hold an upper hand on recent form. They have secured 53.66% of their opponent's second serve points. Comparatively, Efremova has managed to win 48.36%. When it comes to first serve returns, the players are closely matched, with Efremova slightly ahead at 34.73% over Persson's 34.01%.
The under-pressure analysis indicates that Persson has succeeded in saving 50% of breakpoints in recent times, whereas Efremova has saved 45.6%. This metric holds significance for in-game betting as well. With regards to converting breakpoint chances, Persson's conversion rate stands at 46.36%, marginally higher than Efremova’s rate of 45.9%.
From an overall performance standpoint, Persson has won 68.42% of matches played in the past year, translating to a win-loss record of 39-18. Efremova, however, boasts a higher win rate, winning 89.47% of her matches with a 17-2 record. These stats offer a comprehensive head-to-head predictive overview.
Considering the surface preference, Persson excels on indoor hard courts with a career win rate of 62% (W/L 48/29), whereas Efremova favors hard courts, with an impressive 89% win rate (W/L 25/3). However, Efremova’s weakest surface is indoor hard, where she still holds a strong record of 83% (W/L 5/1).
Analyzing the player's level, Persson has largely participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 70.83% of matches over the past year. Efremova, largely playing in Futures/Satellites/ITF events, remains undefeated with a 100% record in such $10K tournaments (W/L 10/0). Alongside this, opponent quality also plays a role. Persson’s opponents averaged a rank of 411.25, slightly higher in caliber compared to Efremova’s, whose opponents averaged a 463.26 ranking.
In possible determining set scenarios, Persson has a 64% win rate over the last 12 months, while Efremova remains unblemished, winning all her deciding sets on the tour. Such insights are crucial for live predictions or betting.
In conclusion, while Persson has displayed commendable consistency and proficiency, Efremova's superior overall win percentage and impressive performance on her favored surface make her the likely victor. Nonetheless, each player’s past and current form should be continuously monitored, especially as the event unfolds. The statistics suggest that Efremova is statistically favored to win the upcoming match.
Persson vs Efremova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Ekaterine Gorgodze
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
85%
(
69 of
81)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
43 of
81)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Francisca Jorge
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
14 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
44
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Whitney Osuigwe
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Lia Karatancheva
77%
(
79 of
102)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
46 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
103
|
1-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Caty McNally
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
69%
(
74 of
107)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
51%
(
55 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
103
|
6-4 0-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Maria Mateas
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
74%
(
79 of
107)
1st Serve %
74%
(
73 of
99)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
48%
(
51 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
109
|
2-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Diletta Cherubini
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Martina Okalova
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Ksenia Efremova
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
9
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Ksenia Efremova
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kathinka Von Deichmann
Player
Ksenia Efremova
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Sarah Iliev
Player
Ksenia Efremova
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
52%
(
17 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ksenia Efremova
Player
Antonia Schmidt
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ksenia Efremova
Player
Chiara Fornasieri
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
74%
(
70 of
94)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
49%
(
22 of
45)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
23 of
70)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
65%
(
11 of
17)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
54%
(
40 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
58 of
94)
92
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ksenia Efremova
Player
Eleejah Inisan
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
60% (249/166) | Win/Loss | 76% (38/12) |
59% (556/391) | Sets Win/Loss | 72% (77/30) |
54% (4627/3936) | Games Win/Loss | 59% (558/382) |
58% (57/42) | Hard Win/Loss | 86% (25/4) |
60% (143/94) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (8/6) |
62% (49/30) | Indoor Hard W/L | 71% (5/2) |
0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
308 | Aces Total | 33 |
0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.4 |
1388 | Total Double Faults | 185 |
1:7:24 | Average Match Time | 1:22:11 |
487.15 | Average Opponent Rank | 341.06 |
65% (11977/18531) | 1st Serve % | 66% (1660/2533) |
60% (7212/11977) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (1014/1660) |
43% (2849/6555) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (374/873) |
50% (1311/2645) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (214/427) |
48% (9057/18740) | Return Points Win % | 52% (1387/2688) |
0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
50% (4/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
14% (1/6) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
59% (112/77) | Challenger W/L | 65% (15/8) |
63% (132/79) | Futures W/L | 92% (23/2) |
60% (243/404) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 76% (38/50) |
0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
52% (42/81) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
49% (61/125) | Deciding Set Win % | 86% (6/7) |
85% (259/219) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (34/34) |
14% (259/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (34/0) |
17% (155/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (16/4) |