Kajsa Rinaldo Persson vs Clervie Ngounoue Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
L W W W W L W L W L
Form
L L W W W W W W W LHead-to-head: Persson 0 - 1 Ngounoue
They have played 3 sets in total, with Persson winning 1 and Ngounoue winning 2. The last match between Persson and Ngounoue was at the W50 Birmingham, 14-02-2025, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Clervie Ngounoue getting the victory 4-6 7-6(4) 6-2.
W50 Birmingham(14-02-2025)
4
6
7
6
6
2
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Joint VS Errani PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Rune VS Draper PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
17 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Clervie Ngounoue
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
39%
(
18 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
49 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
99
|
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
1
Sets Won
2
14
Games Won
17
0
Aces (Total)
4
2
Total Double Faults
5
2:16:39
Average Match Time
2:16:39
66% (60/91)
1st Serve %
57% (61/107)
55% (33/60)
1st Serve Win %
66% (40/61)
55% (17/31)
2nd Serve Win %
39% (18/46)
45% (5/11)
Break Points Won % (Total)
56% (5/9)
46% (49/107)
Return Points Win %
45% (41/91)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
100% (1/1)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson vs Clervie Ngounoue Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kajsa Rinaldo Persson 0 - 1 Clervie Ngounoue
Second serve efficiency in recent form: Over the past six months, Persson has demonstrated a remarkable proficiency on their second serve, winning an impressive 47.92% of points. In contrast, Ngounoue has exhibited a slightly lower success rate of 46.31%. This particular statistic holds a profound significance as it bears a strong correlation with the accuracy of match predictions.
Return game statistics in recent form: Analyzing return game statistics for Persson in recent form reveals their exceptional ability to capitalize on their opponent's second serve points, with a remarkable success rate of 55.81%. Similarly, Ngounoue has displayed a commendable aptitude in this regard, triumphing in 56.42% of such instances. Additionally, when assessing first serve returns, Persson boasts a success rate of 41.28%, while Ngounoue maintains a slightly lower rate of 39.12%. These figures serve as crucial factors in evaluating the favored player in this fiercely contested head-to-head matchup.
Under pressure scrutiny: In instances where both players face crucial breakpoints, Persson has showcased their resilience by saving an impressive 52.68% of them. Conversely, Ngounoue has proven to be equally adept under pressure, saving 55.5% of such breakpoints. This noteworthy statistic provides valuable insights for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the course of the last year, Persson has exhibited a formidable record, winning 69.09% of matches played (with a win/loss ratio of 38/17). On the other hand, Ngounoue has also achieved a commendable success rate of 67.35% (with a win/loss ratio of 33/16). These cumulative statistics offer a comprehensive overview when predicting the outcome of their head-to-head encounter.
Preferred playing surface: Persson excels on I.hard courts, boasting a career win percentage of 64% (with a win/loss ratio of 47/27). Conversely, their performance on Hard courts yields a slightly lower success rate of 58% (with a win/loss ratio of 57/42). Comparatively, Ngounoue thrives on I.hard courts, attaining an impressive career win percentage of 71% (with a win/loss ratio of 10/4). However, their performance on Grass courts has not yielded favorable results, with a win percentage of 0% (with a win/loss ratio of 0/1).
Player classification: During the past year, Persson has predominantly participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments that exceed $10K, securing victories in a remarkable 71.74% of matches played (with a win/loss ratio of 33/13). Meanwhile, Ngounoue has primarily competed in the same level of tournaments, achieving an impressive success rate of 74.42% (with a win/loss ratio of 32/11). When making predictions based on player statistics, it is essential to consider the relative levels of events these players have been involved in.
Opponent quality assessment: Over the past 12 months, Persson has confronted opponents with an average ranking of 252.87, showcasing their tenacity against formidable adversaries. In comparison, Ngounoue has encountered players with an average ranking of 173.35, indicative of their ability to compete against highly ranked opponents.
Performance in deciding sets: For those inclined towards live predictions and betting, examining the players' performances in deciding sets becomes paramount. In this regard, Persson has triumphed in 62% of deciding sets over the past year, while Ngounoue has conquered an impressive 73% of such sets in all matches played on tour.
Current head-to-head statistics: While past performance holds significant predictive value in tennis matches, it is equally crucial to consider current event statistics to gauge the form of the players. For real-time insight into each participant's performance, it is advised to refer to the section below (accessible at this link) in cases where they have actively participated in the ongoing event. Moreover, certain players tend to thrive in specific events, and this factor must be taken into account when making outcome predictions.
Break point conversion proficiency: Recent statistical analysis reveals that Persson skillfully converts 49.01% of breakpoint opportunities, demonstrating their ability to seize crucial moments in a match. Likewise, Ngounoue boasts an impressive rate of 51.27% when it comes to capitalizing on chances to break their opponent's serve. These figures hold significant relevance for in-game live betting, especially when either player finds themselves facing a breakpoint opportunity.
For those seeking further information on tennis match prediction models, this engaging article serves as an insightful resource (Warning: Intended for statistics enthusiasts).
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Amandine Monnot
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
95)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Ksenia Efremova
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Noma Akugue Noha
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Weronika Falkowska
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
76%
(
74 of
98)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
98)
88
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Clervie Ngounoue
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
39%
(
18 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
49 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Matilde Jorge
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Jia-Jing Lu
74%
(
60 of
81)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-0 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | w/o | H2H | |||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Marie Vogt
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve %
81%
(
51 of
63)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Amelia Rajecki
78%
(
73 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
9
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
99)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Clervie Ngounoue Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Victoria Azarenka
Player
Clervie Ngounoue
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Clervie Ngounoue
Player
Sonay Kartal
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
105)
99
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Clervie Ngounoue
Player
Rebecca Marino
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
47%
(
40 of
85)
3
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
7
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Clervie Ngounoue
Player
Viktoria Hruncakova
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
14
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
4
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Clervie Ngounoue
Player
Manon Leonard
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Clervie Ngounoue
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
39%
(
18 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
49 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Clervie Ngounoue
Player
Mika Stojsavljevic
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
79
Total Points Won
58
|
3-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Clervie Ngounoue
Player
Raluca Georgiana Serban
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kaja Juvan
Player
Clervie Ngounoue
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Victoria Mboko
Player
Clervie Ngounoue
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
60% (244/161)
Win/Loss
65% (79/42)
59% (543/380)
Sets Win/Loss
61% (170/107)
54% (4511/3824)
Games Win/Loss
55% (1368/1141)
58% (57/42)
Hard Win/Loss
62% (47/29)
61% (138/89)
Clay Win/Loss
70% (19/8)
62% (49/30)
Indoor Hard W/L
76% (13/4)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/1)
0.08
Aces Per Game
0.2
307
Aces Total
246
0.33
Double Faults Per Game
0.35
1358
Total Double Faults
432
1:6:10
Average Match Time
1:38:46
490
Average Opponent Rank
381.02
64% (11484/17843)
1st Serve %
63% (5079/8031)
60% (6924/11484)
1st Serve Win %
64% (3229/5079)
43% (2760/6360)
2nd Serve Win %
46% (1368/2952)
50% (1266/2549)
Break Points Won % (Total)
48% (489/1010)
48% (8702/17973)
Return Points Win %
46% (3614/7857)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/4)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
60% (3/2)
50% (4/4)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/5)
Main Tour W/L
43% (3/4)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
60% (108/73)
Challenger W/L
70% (61/26)
63% (132/79)
Futures W/L
67% (12/6)
60% (238/394)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
66% (78/118)
0% (0/2)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
51% (39/77)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
48% (13/27)
50% (60/121)
Deciding Set Win %
67% (24/36)
85% (253/215)
1st Set Won, Won Match
91% (67/61)
13% (253/34)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
7% (67/5)
17% (151/26)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
33% (54/18)
Other Predictions
- Loading news...