A. Bondar
To Win
K. Juvan
To Win
Kaja Juvan vs Anouk Koevermans Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L L W W W
Form
W L W L L W L W L LH2H: Juvan 1 - 0 Koevermans
They have played 2 sets in total, with Juvan winning 2 and Koevermans winning 0. The last match between Juvan and Koevermans was at the Wimbledon - London, 25-06-2025, Round: Q2 round, Surface: Grass, with Kaja Juvan getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kaja Juvan | 1 |
| Anouk Koevermans | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Wimbledon - London(25-06-2025)
Kaja Juvan
Anouk Koevermans
6
2
6
0
| Juvan | Stats | Koevermans |
|---|---|---|
| 74% (35-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (12-15) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 207 | Ranking | 198 |
| 58 | Highest Rank | 178 |
| 24 | Age | 21 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 8 | Titles | 2 |
| 66% (256-129) | Career Total W/L | 60% (157-104) |
| $1,962,233 | Career Prize Money | $84,500 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
19 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shapovalov VS Walton PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
19 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cerundolo VS Buse PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
19 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Juvan VS Koevermans H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
Kaja Juvan
Player
Anouk Koevermans
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
Juvan VS Koevermans H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:8:0 | Average Match Time | 1:8:0 |
| 54% (28/52) | 1st Serve % | 47% (21/45) |
| 79% (22/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (13/21) |
| 54% (13/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (7/24) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 56% (25/45) | Return Points Win % | 33% (17/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Juvan vs Koevermans Match Preview :
- Recent second serve performance shows Juvan winning 41.86% of points, slightly outperforming Koevermans, who wins 40.1%. Does this suggest an edge for Juvan? Perhaps.
- In recent return game statistics, Juvan secures 50.2% of opponent second serve points, compared to Koevermans at 48.29%. However, Koevermans excels at returning first serves with 32.73% versus Juvan's 29.94%.
- Under pressure, Koevermans saves 50.65% of breakpoints, notably higher than Juvan's 42.04%. Could this be crucial during critical match moments? It could play a key role.
- Over the past year, Juvan boasts a higher match win rate at 75% against Koevermans' 61.43%, indicating better overall form.
- Clay is Juvan's preferred surface, winning 74% of matches, while Koevermans thrives on indoor hard courts with a 62% win rate. Understanding their favorite surfaces could influence expected performance.
- Facing stronger competition, Juvan's opponents averaged a rank of 249.18, compared to the generally lower-ranked opposition Koevermans faced at 320.74.
- In deciding sets, Juvan proves more resilient, winning 71% of them over the past year, whereas Koevermans won 47%, highlighting Juvan's edge in tight matches.
- Juvan converts 36.82% of breakpoints, trailing Koevermans' rate significantly at 46.09%. Will better breakpoint conversion offer Koevermans an advantage? It's a possibility.
Editorial Prediction (June 25, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the key performance metrics, Juvan displays a solid advantage in both recent match win rates and competitive experience, often facing more formidable opponents.
While Koevermans holds an edge in breakpoint conversion and first serve returns, Juvan’s superior second serve performance and resilience in deciding set situations provide a potential leverage.
Factor in Juvan's higher overall win rate on her best surface and her robustness under challenging match conditions, and she seems well-equipped to secure a win in this upcoming encounter.
Considering all these aspects, Juvan is the likely winner in this match-up given her recent form and track record.
Juvan vs Koevermans Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Kaja Juvan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Leyre Romero Gormaz
60%
(
62 of
104)
1st Serve %
57%
(
56 of
98)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
41 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Louisa Chirico
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
10
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
50 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Maria Timofeeva
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Kaja Juvan
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Irina-Camelia Begu
Player
Kaja Juvan
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(6) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Robin Montgomery
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Anouk Koevermans
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Kyoka Okamura
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Anouk Koevermans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Anouk Koevermans
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Anouk Koevermans
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Shuo Feng
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
20 of
34)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
23%
(
3 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
51
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Anouk Koevermans
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Jessika Ponchet
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Anouk Koevermans
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Anouk Koevermans
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
47
Total Points Won
42
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Federica Urgesi
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
37 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66% (256/129) | Win/Loss | 60% (157/104) |
| 64% (566/321) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (347/247) |
| 56% (4522/3565) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2950/2550) |
| 59% (66/46) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (36/23) |
| 74% (147/52) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (99/64) |
| 54% (26/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (21/13) |
| 65% (17/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 656 | Aces Total | 360 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.53 |
| 730 | Total Double Faults | 1426 |
| 1:29:2 | Average Match Time | 1:34:8 |
| 386.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 402.37 |
| 62% (15333/24618) | 1st Serve % | 61% (9448/15380) |
| 62% (9557/15343) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (5842/9448) |
| 50% (4610/9281) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (2351/5932) |
| 50% (1573/3154) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1102/2171) |
| 47% (11494/24618) | Return Points Win % | 49% (7601/15536) |
| 65% (40/22) | Slam W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 56% (14/11) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 65% (15/8) | Cups W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 54% (49/41) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 72% (108/41) | Challenger W/L | 63% (98/58) |
| 83% (30/6) | Futures W/L | 60% (56/38) |
| 67% (251/376) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (156/260) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (40/82) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (31/57) |
| 53% (66/124) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (39/73) |
| 88% (247/217) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (159/138) |
| 12% (247/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (159/21) |
| 26% (137/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (102/19) |
Juvan vs. Koevermans Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
