V. Rodriguez
To Win
T. Lukas
To Win
Kaitlin Quevedo vs Tena Lukas Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L W L W L L
Form
L W W W L W W L L WHead-To-Head: Quevedo 1 - 1 Lukas
They have played 5 sets in total, with Quevedo winning 2 and Lukas winning 3. The last match between Quevedo and Lukas was at the Open Internacional Femeni Solgirones - La Bisbal D'Emporda, 30-03-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Kaitlin Quevedo getting the victory 3-6 7-5 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kaitlin Quevedo | 1 |
| Tena Lukas | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Open Internacional Femeni Solgirones - La Bisbal D'Emporda(30-03-2025)
Kaitlin Quevedo
Tena Lukas
3
6
7
5
6
1
| Quevedo | Stats | Lukas |
|---|---|---|
| 52% (13-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (14-12) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 244 | Ranking | 296 |
| 244 | Highest Rank | 200 |
| 19 | Age | 30 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 13 |
| 66% (91-46) | Career Total W/L | 57% (457-338) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $73,350 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
22 May 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Li VS Joint PREDICTION Clay
Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat wta
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Linette VS Rybakina PREDICTION Clay
Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg wta
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-5 6-1 |
Stats 
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Tena Lukas
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
92)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
15
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 22 | Games Won | 24 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 19 |
| 1:46:54 | Average Match Time | 1:46:54 |
| 63% (85/134) | 1st Serve % | 59% (86/147) |
| 53% (45/85) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (56/86) |
| 45% (22/49) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (20/61) |
| 48% (11/23) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 60% (12/20) |
| 48% (71/147) | Return Points Win % | 50% (67/134) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Quevedo vs Lukas Match Preview :
When examining the nuanced dynamics of the tennis court, how much weight does a player's second serve hold in the game’s grander scheme? For Quevedo, recent months have seen him secure 38.03% of points from his second serve engagements. His competitor, Lukas, edges slightly ahead with a 39.06% success rate. The second serve statistic often aligns closely with predicting match outcomes, offering an insightful glimpse into a player's form and resilience.
In what ways do return games shift the balance of power? Quevedo has outmaneuvered his opponents on 45.64% of their second serves, but Lukas shines further with a more commanding 51.57%. The stats for first serve returns reveal Quevedo at 35.59% and Lukas marginally lower at 34.59%, which add another layer of prediction accuracy. Looking under pressure, Lukas shows a slight advantage, saving 47.76% of breakpoints, compared to Quevedo's 46.9%. Such fine margins often prove pivotal in game-time betting scenarios.
Performance metrics over time paint an interesting picture of these players. Over the past year, Quevedo's win tally is 65.08%, a notable lead over Lukas's 53.97%. Analyzing surface preference, Quevedo has thrived on hard courts with a 74% win rate, while Lukas finds strength on clay, clinching 62% of his matches.
The competitive theatre shifts to the direct confrontations between the two. In their previous encounter, Lukas emerged victoriously, solidifying this with a straight-sets victory in a relatively brisk 1:35:0 duration match. Although the history of head-to-head clashes is scant, the data underlines Lukas's prior success against Quevedo.
As we delve into challenger levels, Quevedo has dipped into the Challenger/ITF circuits, winning 62.07% of his matches. Lukas isn't far behind at 55.17%. The caliber of adversaries faced also factors in, with Quevedo's opponents averaging a 373.33 rank, while Lukas has faced higher-ranked opposition at 358.
Intriguingly, as matches tread into deciding set territory, Quevedo boasts a strong record, winning 68% of these tense game conclusions over the past year. Lukas, too, has held his own with a 50% success rate. A clutch player can often swing a tightly contested match in their favor.
With break point conversion providing a further competitive edge, Lukas again leads slightly with a 42.62% conversion rate against Quevedo’s 40.34%. This tangible stat helps in the wagering of in-play bets, giving Lukas a potential edge when the opportunity arises.
Considering these layers of analysis, Lukas might seem favored to extend his record over Quevedo based on historical and statistical insight. However, the unpredictability of the sport means each match bounces to its rhythm, and as the two faces off, it could still be an electrifying contest. Given the data, Lukas holds a slight statistical edge and could step onto the court with confidence as the probable victor.
Quevedo vs Lukas Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Kaitlin Quevedo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve %
74%
(
64 of
87)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Dmitruk
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
87%
(
55 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Mila Masic
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessika Ponchet
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
56%
(
66 of
117)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
95)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
39%
(
20 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
41%
(
48 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
47%
(
16 of
34)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
41%
(
16 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
46
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Blinkova
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
78%
(
73 of
94)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Nuria Parrizas-Diaz
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Irene Burillo Escorihuela
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
88
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Tena Lukas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Carolyn Ansari
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
11
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simona Waltert
Player
Tena Lukas
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
53
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Lian Tran
41%
(
30 of
73)
1st Serve %
76%
(
84 of
110)
7
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
40%
(
17 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
24%
(
6 of
25)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
56 of
110)
100
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Darja Semenistaja
Player
Tena Lukas
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
44 of
83)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
14
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Kristina Dmitruk
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
42%
(
18 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Emily Appleton
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
5
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66% (91/46) | Win/Loss | 57% (457/338) |
| 62% (198/123) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1039/816) |
| 55% (1613/1299) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (9059/8046) |
| 74% (26/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 39% (12/19) |
| 63% (57/33) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (415/261) |
| 67% (8/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 34% (29/56) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 182 | Aces Total | 1152 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 334 | Total Double Faults | 2794 |
| 1:45:45 | Average Match Time | 1:7:12 |
| 440.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 528.94 |
| 66% (5987/9059) | 1st Serve % | 58% (21330/36483) |
| 60% (3566/5987) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (13262/21330) |
| 48% (1487/3072) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (6449/15154) |
| 49% (638/1313) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (2412/4884) |
| 49% (4420/9044) | Return Points Win % | 48% (17685/37185) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 17% (1/5) |
| 50% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 38% (3/5) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 29% (6/15) |
| 58% (55/40) | Challenger W/L | 55% (279/228) |
| 90% (35/4) | Futures W/L | 66% (168/85) |
| 66% (90/136) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (454/785) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 52% (13/25) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (82/179) |
| 65% (30/46) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (145/269) |
| 89% (82/73) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (453/381) |
| 11% (82/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (453/72) |
| 33% (55/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (342/76) |
Quevedo vs. Lukas Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
