Kaitlin Quevedo vs Mila Masic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W W W W W L
Form
W W L W L W L W L LHead-To-Head: Quevedo 1 - 0 Masic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Quevedo winning 2 and Masic winning 0. The last match between Quevedo and Masic was at the W75 Trnava, 12-05-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Kaitlin Quevedo getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kaitlin Quevedo | 1 |
| Mila Masic | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W75 Trnava(12-05-2025)
Kaitlin Quevedo
Mila Masic
6
3
6
4
| Quevedo | Stats | Masic |
|---|---|---|
| 58% (18-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 48% (10-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 236 | Ranking | 880 |
| 222 | Highest Rank | 875 |
| 19 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 8 | Titles | 0 |
| 67% (96-47) | Career Total W/L | 49% (85-89) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Voegele VS Shibahara PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
24 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Fonseca PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
25 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Mila Masic
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:32:24 | Average Match Time | 1:32:24 |
| 59% (34/58) | 1st Serve % | 65% (39/60) |
| 82% (28/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (27/39) |
| 58% (14/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (10/21) |
| 33% (2/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 38% (23/60) | Return Points Win % | 28% (16/58) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Quevedo vs Masic Match Preview :
- Quevedo's second-serve point win rate over the past 6 months is 36.38%, while Masic's is slightly higher at 39.88%. Does this give Masic an upper hand in pressure situations? Possibly.
- In return games, Quevedo takes 49.5% of their opponent's second serve points, compared to Masic's 46.4%. This indicates Quevedo's strength in exploiting second serves.
- For returns on first serves, Quevedo scores 36.67% versus Masic's 31.43%. This gives Quevedo an edge in starting points when receiving.
- Under pressure, Quevedo saves 48.18% of breakpoints while Masic saves 49.59%. Which player thrives more in critical moments? Masic seems slightly better.
- Quevedo's overall match win rate in the past year is 67.65%, significantly higher than Masic's 44.74%. This suggests overall superior performance by Quevedo.
- On hard surfaces, Quevedo excels with a win rate of 74%, whereas Masic performs better on clay with 52% wins. Does this influence the match outcome depending on the surface?
- Quevedo competes mainly in Challengers/ITF events with over $10K prize money, winning 65.57% of such matches, while Masic plays mostly on a lower tier, securing 42.31% wins. This could illustrate a difference in competitive exposure and experience.
- The average rank of opponents Quevedo faces is 339.32, while Masic's is slightly higher at 334.89. Is this marginal difference significant in assessing player prowess? Perhaps not.
- Should the match extend to a deciding set, Quevedo has a 68% win rate, surpassing Masic's 57%. Might this affect players' preparation and approach? Likely.
- When converting breakpoints recently, Quevedo achieves a 39.15% success rate, compared to Masic's 36.62%. Does Quevedo's slight advantage hint at more effective big moments? It could.
Editorial Prediction (May 12, 2025, UTC):
Given the recent performance statistics, Quevedo shows a slightly stronger profile in terms of match wins, return effectiveness, and breakpoint conversions. They consistently engage in higher-level competitions, which may contribute to their comprehensive match experience.
Masic, while showing commendable performance under pressure, particularly on clay, falls behind Quevedo in various performance metrics important for this matchup, such as return games and deciding set wins.
Based on these analytical insights, Quevedo is the favored choice to be the victor in this upcoming tennis match.
Quevedo vs Masic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Kaitlin Quevedo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Mia Ristic
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
51%
(
38 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Aneta Laboutkova
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Laura Samson
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
48 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
68
|
4-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Stephanie Wagner
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Radka Zelnickova
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
8 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
49
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve %
74%
(
64 of
87)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Dmitruk
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
87%
(
55 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mila Masic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Granwehr
Player
Mila Masic
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Wozuko Mdlulwa
Player
Mila Masic
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
84)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mila Masic
Player
Patricia Gui
36%
(
5 of
14)
1st Serve %
53%
(
9 of
17)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
82%
(
14 of
17)
26
Total Points Won
5
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ruth Roura Llaverias
Player
Mila Masic
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
2
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
1
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mila Masic
Player
Cayetana Gay
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Mila Masic
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mila Masic
Player
Nadezhda Shamenkova
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joelle Steur
Player
Mila Masic
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67% (96/47) | Win/Loss | 49% (85/89) |
| 62% (208/127) | Sets Win/Loss | 48% (186/202) |
| 56% (1687/1345) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (1756/1747) |
| 74% (26/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 38% (5/8) |
| 65% (62/34) | Clay Win/Loss | 51% (76/72) |
| 67% (8/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 31% (4/9) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 194 | Aces Total | 118 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 341 | Total Double Faults | 249 |
| 1:46:2 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 438.17 | Average Opponent Rank | 321.7 |
| 66% (6214/9428) | 1st Serve % | 58% (3284/5676) |
| 60% (3714/6214) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (1920/3284) |
| 48% (1550/3214) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1057/2392) |
| 48% (671/1384) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (299/642) |
| 49% (4619/9427) | Return Points Win % | 44% (2407/5524) |
| 50% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (60/41) | Challenger W/L | 39% (18/28) |
| 90% (35/4) | Futures W/L | 52% (67/61) |
| 67% (95/142) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (83/171) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 52% (13/25) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (8/24) |
| 67% (32/48) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (24/41) |
| 90% (86/77) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (81/73) |
| 10% (86/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (81/8) |
| 33% (57/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (93/12) |
Quevedo vs. Masic Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
