Kai-Chen Chang vs Humera Baharmus Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W L W W L
Form
L W L W W W L W W LHead-to-head: Chang 1 - 0 Baharmus
They have played 2 sets in total, with Chang winning 2 and Baharmus winning 0. The last match between Chang and Baharmus was at the W25 Nonthaburi, 02-02-2020, Q1 round, Hard with Kai-Chen Chang getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
W25 Nonthaburi(02-02-2020)
6
1
6
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Pavlyuchenkova VS Linette PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Yuan VS Siniakova PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats 
Kai-Chen Chang
Player
Humera Baharmus
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
36%
(
16 of
44)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
25
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
1
1
Aces (Total)
1
2
Total Double Faults
3
0:46:0
Average Match Time
0:46:0
54% (20/37)
1st Serve %
36% (16/44)
80% (16/20)
1st Serve Win %
44% (7/16)
65% (11/17)
2nd Serve Win %
29% (8/28)
86% (6/7)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/3)
66% (29/44)
Return Points Win %
27% (10/37)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kai-Chen Chang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Kai-Chen Chang
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kai-Chen Chang
Player
Humera Baharmus
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
36%
(
16 of
44)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Kai-Chen Chang
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
27%
(
7 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kai-Chen Chang
Player
Riya Bhatia
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
7
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kai-Chen Chang
Player
Ho Ching Wu
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
46 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Kai-Chen Chang
Player
Yui Chikaraishi
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kai-Chen Chang
Player
Miyabi Inoue
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
6
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Na-Lae Han
Player
Kai-Chen Chang
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kai-Chen Chang
Player
Su Jeong Jang
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Humera Baharmus Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Anastasiia Gureva
Player
Humera Baharmus
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
45 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Humera Baharmus
Player
Maria Kalyakina
51%
(
49 of
96)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
9
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 6-3 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty
Player
Humera Baharmus
50%
(
52 of
103)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
6
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
6
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
39%
(
20 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
47 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
95
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Humera Baharmus
Player
Priyanshi Bhandari
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Humera Baharmus
Player
Paavanii Paathak
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Humera Baharmus
Player
Mirudhula Palanivel
35%
(
15 of
43)
1st Serve %
37%
(
14 of
38)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
73%
(
11 of
15)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jizel Matos Sequeira Fernandes
Player
Humera Baharmus
36%
(
14 of
39)
1st Serve %
37%
(
19 of
51)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
57%
(
8 of
14)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Humera Baharmus
Player
Tanisha Kashyap
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Honoka Kobayashi
Player
Humera Baharmus
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve %
38%
(
13 of
34)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
51
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
55% (282/228)
Win/Loss
46% (93/110)
55% (640/531)
Sets Win/Loss
46% (212/246)
52% (5678/5139)
Games Win/Loss
48% (2032/2214)
57% (216/162)
Hard Win/Loss
45% (73/90)
26% (9/25)
Clay Win/Loss
55% (17/14)
64% (38/21)
Indoor Hard W/L
38% (3/5)
49% (19/20)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/1)
0.11
Aces Per Game
0.14
561
Aces Total
290
0.35
Double Faults Per Game
0.34
1827
Total Double Faults
702
1st Match
Average Match Time
1:14:19
571.99
Average Opponent Rank
365.82
60% (13513/22455)
1st Serve %
49% (5245/10662)
62% (8365/13513)
1st Serve Win %
62% (3226/5245)
43% (3805/8942)
2nd Serve Win %
42% (2273/5417)
47% (1327/2816)
Break Points Won % (Total)
48% (593/1236)
46% (10218/22095)
Return Points Win %
45% (4679/10392)
46% (21/25)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
39% (13/20)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
56% (9/7)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
44% (52/66)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
63% (174/101)
Challenger W/L
44% (50/64)
59% (13/9)
Futures W/L
48% (43/46)
55% (279/505)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
46% (91/200)
50% (1/2)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
55% (60/109)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
59% (13/22)
49% (75/152)
Deciding Set Win %
49% (27/55)
87% (279/243)
1st Set Won, Won Match
78% (105/82)
13% (279/36)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
21% (105/22)
17% (231/39)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
11% (98/11)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
