Kaden Hensel vs Jarryd Chaplin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hensel vs Chaplin analysis and find out who is favored!
Kaden Hensel vs Jarryd Chaplin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hensel has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Chaplin has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hensel, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chaplin has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hensel has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chaplin has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hensel has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Chaplin winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hensel has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 70% (W/L 16/ 7), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 6/ 6). Chaplin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 66/ 58), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hensel winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hensel winning 2 and Chaplin winning 0. The last match between Hensel and Chaplin was at the Australia F5, 14-09-2009, First, Hard with Kaden Hensel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hensel and Chaplin have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hensel winning 0 times and Chaplin 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hensel winning 0, and Chaplin 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hensel has played against opponents with an average rank of while Chaplin has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hensel has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chaplin has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hensel has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chaplin has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hensel 1 - 0 Chaplin
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
390
High
37
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
824
High
31
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
58% (96-70)
Career Total W/L
51% (73-71)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Kaden Hensel | Jarryd Chaplin |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 6 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-3 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Kaden Hensel | Jarryd Chaplin |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Kaden Hensel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Hiroki Kondo
Player
Kaden Hensel
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve %
72%
(
23 of
32)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
8 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
34
Total Points Won
27
|
6-4 0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kaden Hensel
Player
Kento Takeuchi
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
20 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 | 7-6(5) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Dane Propoggia
Player
Kaden Hensel
44%
(
27 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
4
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kaden Hensel
Player
Sang-Hoon Song
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
69%
(
25 of
36)
11
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50
Total Points Won
18
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Jarryd Chaplin Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Bradley Mousley
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
12
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
16 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jarryd Chaplin
Player
Jianhui Li
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Adam El Mihdawy
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
40%
(
14 of
35)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jarryd Chaplin
Player
Christopher Rosensteel
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Fabiano De Paula
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Sekou Bangoura
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jarryd Chaplin
Player
Mark Oljaca
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Austin Krajicek
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
5
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
3
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more